Replicel

[Davey Jones]

I'd be curious how quickly a *brand new* follicile takes to make a hair. Its first growth cycle probably doesn't succeed its second is probably not complete either.

Think healthy-ly fed babies. Some grow hair like mad in the womb, some have wisps for many months. But what about the same thing in an adult?


Given proper nutrition, and not boosters, that is.

Yeah, I love how some people were so willing to say "see, I told you Replicel would fail" at six months. Most treatments take much longer, and this is a fairly distinct (from current treatments) method.

Jeez, people, Replicel may or may not be a flop, but at least give it as long as you'd give fin.

[NotBelievingIt]

I'd be curious how quickly a *brand new* follicile takes to make a hair. Its first growth cycle probably doesn't succeed its second is probably not complete either.

Think healthy-ly fed babies. Some grow hair like mad in the womb, some have wisps for many months if not longer. But what about the same thing in an adult?


Given proper nutrition, and not boosters, that is.

[marginex]

New Update from Replicel

Another update, quite positive in my eyes!

http://www.replicel.com/further-analysis-reveals-double-digit-hair-growth-in-replicels-first-in-man-clinical-trial/

Brett

[sickly_burnt_tree_forest]

chasing tails is fine, anything to give hope and take up the time... having hairloss at a young age is worse than cancer...you dont get the concideration of dying from others, but your soul is. these companys are all we have for hope.

[67mph]

You know i thought that's what was happening.

We're just all busy chasing tails!

[NeedHairASAP]

This thread had masses of posts each day in the run-up to the 6month trail reaults, now there isn't much happening, where's everyone gone?!

Shall i start a 12month results countdown?

5 months and 12 days approx. to go...?

somebody should put a highlight reel together of all the funny speculation...

"if they do more than 50% increase its all over!"

"Do you think they'll be able to give me a hairline lower than my adolescent one?!"

"should I invest everything I have in replicel?"


I"m sure there are more

[gmonasco]

This thread had masses of posts each day in the run-up to the 6month trail reaults, now there isn't much happening, where's everyone gone?!

They've gone to the Histogen thread.

Shall i start a 12month results countdown?

Given the six-month results, I don't think many people here have much anticipation for the twelve-month results.

[67mph]

This thread had masses of posts each day in the run-up to the 6month trail reaults, now there isn't much happening, where's everyone gone?!

Shall i start a 12month results countdown?

5 months and 12 days approx. to go...?

[sickly_burnt_tree_forest]

I bet when they first tested on mice they had a few hairs sprout up and it took refinement, so why shouldnt humans be the same? i think aslong as it works to some degree there is alot of room for improvement in the near future. I just hope they get to keep on going and who ever brings a acceptable cure to this disease is going to be rich as they want to be.

[Horseshoe]

hey guys, i was trying to make a thread but i cant for some reason it wont let me. I was gonna ask:

1. Will replicel release photos from their most recent results?

2. Will they give us another update 6 months from their most recent results to see how their patients are doing after a year?

Thanks!

If the results after one year are cosmetically significant and improves beyond what was reported at the six month mark they will release the photos. Lets keep our fingers crossed.

[goldbondmafia]

hey guys, i was trying to make a thread but i cant for some reason it wont let me. I was gonna ask:

1. Will replicel release photos from their most recent results?

2. Will they give us another update 6 months from their most recent results to see how their patients are doing after a year?

Thanks!

[raminjan]

I have a objection to your post though

Naturally if your hair cells are weak enough to produce hair, then they produce hair at the microscopic level under your skin so I don't know why Repicell calls it's results a positive and optimistic results. by seen 12 microscopic hairs grown.

[Nilli57211]

We need to see the data stratified by sex before getting down on the numbers. 9 of the 19 subjects were female. It seems to me that this treatment would more effective in men due to the quality cells in the male donor area. I don't think women have this stable donor area to pull cells from which, which could compromise their results.

Actually if anything, I think it would work better in women, just as Rogaine has been shown to - the reason for this being that women's hair follicles aren't as "far gone" as men's. As for unstable donor cells, even if that were an issue, it doesn't seem like that would have an effect on these initial results (though possibly those hairs might fall out faster in the long run).

I think the negativity is ridiculous. They've produced results (though fairly small), they proved safety - and people are blasting them because they haven't cured baldness in their PHASE I trial. We all want a cure, so the negative comments aren't helping anyone, especially when they're not based on anything. Let the scientists do their jobs, live your lives, and understand that it's more about the big picture than every little set of seemingly disappointing results. Remember Histogen produced impressive results as well - there's more than one company working on this, and we really only need one of them to get it right.

[67mph]

Interview's been done already, got its own thread, like here there's good and bad posts but of course what you do is listen to the interview yourself and disect the info how you see fit, just beware (unlike some) it's best to keep the innervoice to yourself, share but don't scare!

C'mon Replicel, we've a Big3 (and then some, some guys don't realise) fighting to make this happen!

[gmonasco]