CB-03-01 - new antiandrogenic

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tenma
    replied
    Originally posted by Xoxo
    Well, isn't the focus on maintaining hair instead of regrowth? Then, it might be judged too quickly. Maybe you can keep your hair better with CB than with Minox in the long run. But I'm no expert. Someone with more knowledge should anser on that.
    Antiandrogens show its true benefits at the 8-12 months mark.

    There is broad consensus on that.

    The dose ranging study will provide good evidence about what breezula can really do for us.

    That said, i think RU is at least as good as CB, so im not really that nterested about the CB

    Leave a comment:


  • Xoxo
    replied
    Originally posted by Trouse5858
    lol 13 hairs. Impossible to argue its worth smearing shit on your head evryday for such an embarrassing result
    Well, isn't the focus on maintaining hair instead of regrowth? Then, it might be judged too quickly. Maybe you can keep your hair better with CB than with Minox in the long run. But I'm no expert. Someone with more knowledge should anser on that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Seuxin
    replied
    Warning, they used at 5%, but maybe CB-03-01 should be used at 7-10%.
    If CB is really able to inhibe AR Receptor it should work !

    Leave a comment:


  • Trouse5858
    replied
    lol 13 hairs. Impossible to argue its worth smearing shit on your head evryday for such an embarrassing result

    Leave a comment:


  • Guildenstern
    replied
    The results are a huge step backwards. It was barely as efficient as Minox.

    While i am always happy to see something new, it just feels too weak. A mean increase in 13 hairs over the whole period of the study?
    I guess you could indeed use this in synergy with Minox to achieve a better effect. Customers will love to now smear 2 topicals on their heads for a mean increase of 25% hair density. yay.

    I still don't really understand why they had to switch to a lousy 'vehicle'. The results in their POC study using iontophoresis were really strong - really, really strong. Yet again, nobody will buy a compound, a machine, and use a time consuming and expensive procedure to keep their hair. At least nobody who's right in the head. I have no dount anyone here would do it. Personally, i'd do it instantly.

    And let's not forget this whole thing is still a grand mystery. Wasn't there a chemist or biologist who claimed it would be exceptionally hard to get this specific molecule into your dermis using just iontophoresis, because it had no loading site or something? Now they have encapsulated their pure-golden molecule into a super crappy cream or whatever-based vehicle that isn't working. Well done.

    Leave a comment:


  • burtandernie
    replied
    Ah they released new results? I wouldnt throw out CB just yet. The dosing might yield better results, it works on women, and it might stack with fin to combat DHT from two angles doing a much better job than fin or even dut alone. If it has any efficacy I think they should keep going with it. Hopefully the dosing will increase the results. Also like they said it might take 12 months, and once MPB starts its arguable if an AA still for sure stops it. You need to take it before it gets going, but everyone is so worried about sides from propecia they delay it until absolutely needed. This might solve that
    I dont think anyone ever expected results unlike fin or dut but CB is way safer to use long term.

    Leave a comment:


  • burtandernie
    replied
    An AA that helps both men and women with few probably minor sides? Sounds like a for sure winner to me. Also you have to wonder could it be used to stop or prevent body hair? Im curious if someone applied RU to their beard what happens? In theory RU or CB should do something there or prevent it from happening. RU and CB both compete with T not just DHT so you would expect it to stop or slow beard hair/body hair too

    Leave a comment:


  • machi
    replied
    Joshuk , Can you explain your treatment? How long have you been with CB -03-01 ? Do any effect , less hair loss ? Can you explain what use about wnt/b catean? I was hopeful that cb worked but after yesterday's results I have doubts. I need to use any drugs to keep my hair .
    Does anyone use CB some time with good results ?

    Leave a comment:


  • joshuk
    replied
    the fact that CB-03-01 regrew hair is impressive since anti androgens are for keeping hair not regrowth. i have just started back on CB at 40-50mg a day, so i guess i will report back in 6 months then. im not using minox but i am using chemical's wnt/b catean findings found further down on the cutting edge page.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tenma
    replied
    I agree with the company. 6 months is too early for antiandrogen to display maximum effect

    But we must keep in mind what cb really is: a topical androgen antagonist, nothing more, nothing less...

    Even castration was unable to regrow hair on most of the eunuchs:

    Effect of castration in adolescent and young adult males upon further changes in the proportions of bare and hairy scalp


    I think cb real value comes when combined with Dut or Fin (alpa reductase inhibition) , because it works by a complementary mechanism (receptor blockage)

    Leave a comment:


  • Tenma
    replied
    This is from their recent press release:

    "As for mean increase in TAHC at Month 6 (12.70 Breezula® vs. 18.8 Minoxidil®), it should be considered that the treatment per protocol was 6 months and that it is known that antiandrogens (such as Propecia®) show maximum efficacy at 12 months, while it is also known that Minoxidil® has its efficacy peak at 4 months, so the data were as expected.

    Given the patients sample size (30 per group) the study was not powered to show statistical superiority at this stage.

    Diana Harbort, CEO, said: “I am more than happy with these results. Our objective is to develop an efficacious topical antiandrogen product without limiting side effects and with the ability of being used by both men and women. The clinical data are in line with our hopes. Now we are very much looking forward to taking Breezula® into phase II dose ranging studies as quickly as possible”.

    Leave a comment:


  • potato1987
    replied
    I was a bit hopeful it would do maintenance but the results show some people worse off? PER-PROTOCOL (N=23) (N=25) (N=25) 0.2213
    CB MIN Vehicle
    -1=SLIGHTLY DECREASED 5 ( 21.7%) 1 ( 4.0%) 8 ( 32.0%) .
    -2=MODERATELY DECREASED 1 ( 4.3%) 2 ( 8.0%) 2 ( 8.0%) .
    -3=GREATLY DECREASED 0 ( 0.0%) 1 ( 4.0%) 0 ( 0.0%)

    any thoughts?

    Leave a comment:


  • MindfluX
    replied
    Originally posted by rdawg
    Although in the drug's defence they are doing a dose ranging study next so a higher dose could prove to be much better.
    I am familiar with research chemicals, but none of these compounds have an effect on the hair. Effects are mostly lineair, but some are logarithmic: a double amount of compound multiplies the effect eight times for instance.

    You never know ;-)

    Do you know the amount they used now?

    Leave a comment:


  • TravisB
    replied
    Even if CB will work like Finasteride and stop hairloss but without the sides and messing with hormones, it will still be great and much better than what we have now

    But it will probably be released on the market in 2020 - 2021 at the earliest, judging by the pipeline, so it's still a long time left...

    Leave a comment:


  • rdawg
    replied
    Originally posted by MindfluX
    It's no holy grail, but the results on page 21 don't look that disappointing to me. They continue to start Phase 2 and there's no Go/No-Go decision for CB-03-01 now.

    Can you explain what you find dissappointing? Did you expect better results?
    Well the results look equivalent to Minoxidil(almost exact actually) which is definitely dissapointing. It has an affect but a very weak one. Although in the drug's defence they are doing a dose ranging study next so a higher dose could prove to be much better.

    Really though I dont think anyone expected much from this one, it was seen as a similar product to Finasteride without the sides, which was never going to cause alot of hairgrowth.

    SM, Histogen and Replicel were always more interesting as they actually talk about growth, not just maintenence.

    Leave a comment:

Working...