Will an official cure ever be found? Honestly

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • kuba197
    replied
    https://www.*************/news/what-...-biotech-space

    Leave a comment:


  • dutchguyhanging
    replied
    Originally posted by doinmyheadin
    Lol James you might be onto something. I think Floyd Butterworth summed up Replicel if you were on the forums before and after there phase one trials. Just because Shesiedo has invested in them doesnt mean squat. Sheseido sells Adenogen which has some great MPB figures during ther 'trails' but many people have used it and said it is a waste of time.
    this is actually why i proposed to shut down the whole cutting edge sections... there is alot of dust noise around and at some point no one even knows which info is correct or valuable...

    Leave a comment:


  • doinmyheadin
    replied
    Originally posted by jamesst11
    Good point... they should just combine some finasteride with some viagra and call it finagra, or viasteride... man I am gonna be a millionaire
    Lol James you might be onto something. I think Floyd Butterworth summed up Replicel if you were on the forums before and after there phase one trials. Just because Shesiedo has invested in them doesnt mean squat. Sheseido sells Adenogen which has some great MPB figures during ther 'trails' but many people have used it and said it is a waste of time.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesst11
    replied
    Originally posted by Follisket
    Seriously, if the difference between a treatment and a cure lies exclusively in convenience then I don't freaking care if we ever get a cure. Hell, I'd be willing to do the chicken dance every night at 4 am dressed in a monkey suit if it worked and gave me a full head of hair. Just give me something that works 4fs.
    I mean, they literally don't even have to figure out anything new necessarily. Just pretty copy the mechanism of existing AAs but block the side effects. And they've had decades to do that. For a tweak. Decades!
    Good point... they should just combine some finasteride with some viagra and call it finagra, or viasteride... man I am gonna be a millionaire

    Leave a comment:


  • Follisket
    replied
    Seriously, if the difference between a treatment and a cure lies exclusively in convenience then I don't freaking care if we ever get a cure. Hell, I'd be willing to do the chicken dance every night at 4 am dressed in a monkey suit if it worked and gave me a full head of hair. Just give me something that works 4fs.
    I mean, they literally don't even have to figure out anything new necessarily. Just pretty copy the mechanism of existing AAs but block the side effects. And they've had decades to do that. For a tweak. Decades!

    Leave a comment:


  • jjo
    replied
    who cares about a cure right now? we need a better treatment that doesn't give sides and that would buy us all more time till a full cure does come out.

    Leave a comment:


  • dutchguyhanging
    replied
    Originally posted by FloydButterworth
    Yes, their absolutely terrible results from phase I. Also, all this talk of them "immunizing" against baldness is absolutely ridiculous. There is not a single shred of evidence that their treatment can do that. Not in animal models, not invitro, and certainly not in humans. It's hype from the corporate board at replicel. The same guys who paid a stock pumper to scream from the roof tops that they have cured mpb right before they released phase I results. Watching them try to distance themselves from that was quite the spectacle. This treatment is a very long shot to even beat minoxidil. I'm rooting for them, but, honestly i think they have very little chance of sucess and that's simply a reflection of the beast that they're up against. MPB destroys companies almost as well as it destroys hairlines.
    well i agree. If they were onto something big, they would have made such marketing campaigns....etc. people are done with speculations. no matter what.. i firmly believe they already guess or know phase2 outcomes even phase3 at least to what extent the treatment could work...

    Leave a comment:


  • FloydButterworth
    replied
    Originally posted by wriggles
    Is there any reason you think they are going to fail?
    Yes, their absolutely terrible results from phase I. Also, all this talk of them "immunizing" against baldness is absolutely ridiculous. There is not a single shred of evidence that their treatment can do that. Not in animal models, not invitro, and certainly not in humans. It's hype from the corporate board at replicel. The same guys who paid a stock pumper to scream from the roof tops that they have cured mpb right before they released phase I results. Watching them try to distance themselves from that was quite the spectacle. This treatment is a very long shot to even beat minoxidil. I'm rooting for them, but, honestly i think they have very little chance of sucess and that's simply a reflection of the beast that they're up against. MPB destroys companies almost as well as it destroys hairlines.

    Leave a comment:


  • wriggles
    replied
    Originally posted by Swooping
    Hey Arashi,

    Nice to see you back . I have been doing well. Got a hair transplant which turned out very well so that's excellent. Where have you been these times?

    Thanks for the advice.

    Honestly I'm not getting my hopes up at all for Replicel too. I just think hypothetically they might have a chance of immunizing (healthy) hair follicles, but if I had to bet my money I would bet that they are going to fail immediately. I see a glimmer of hope I guess that's all. There is a world of difference between a hypothesis and showing actual results obviously.

    I guess we will just have to wait and "hope" for the best. Time will tell. We can't really do anything else I guess?
    Is there any reason you think they are going to fail?

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesst11
    replied
    Originally posted by Swooping
    Hey Arashi,

    Nice to see you back . I have been doing well. Got a hair transplant which turned out very well so that's excellent. Where have you been these times?

    Thanks for the advice.

    Honestly I'm not getting my hopes up at all for Replicel too. I just think hypothetically they might have a chance of immunizing (healthy) hair follicles, but if I had to bet my money I would bet that they are going to fail immediately. I see a glimmer of hope I guess that's all. There is a world of difference between a hypothesis and showing actual results obviously.

    I guess we will just have to wait and "hope" for the best. Time will tell. We can't really do anything else I guess?
    Shit, I just bought 10,000 shares of Replicel stock and you tell me this NOW???

    Leave a comment:


  • allTheGoodNamesAreTaken
    replied
    What have Replicel actually shown in terms of results to deserve any interest anyway? As far as I'm aware they put out some underwhelming results a few years ago and nothing concrete since. I'm not putting any hope in them until they show some proper results and I don't know why stock traders would either at this moment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Swooping
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Hey Swooping, how are you doing ? I havent really followed Replicel myself. I know one thing though: the stock market never is wrong. REPCF currently trades at 21 cents and has a market cap of a lousy 13M usd, which is a joke, even for an OTC company. It's pretty much all one needs to know.

    So not getting my hopes up on replicel ...
    Hey Arashi,

    Nice to see you back . I have been doing well. Got a hair transplant which turned out very well so that's excellent. Where have you been these times?

    Thanks for the advice.

    Honestly I'm not getting my hopes up at all for Replicel too. I just think hypothetically they might have a chance of immunizing (healthy) hair follicles, but if I had to bet my money I would bet that they are going to fail immediately. I see a glimmer of hope I guess that's all. There is a world of difference between a hypothesis and showing actual results obviously.

    I guess we will just have to wait and "hope" for the best. Time will tell. We can't really do anything else I guess?

    Leave a comment:


  • iaskdumbquestions
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    I've been a professional stock trader for 18 years now. Believe me bro, when the market values a stock like this it means there's not much to get excited about right now. That doesn't mean it can't work, but that there's no such indication at the moment, it's a long shot, based on the market value.
    That's a very backwards way of thinking about stocks in my opinion.

    Originally posted by jamesst11
    I don't know too much about stocks, so I probably shouldn't comment, but I will anyway! haha... if professional brokers have the knowledge ahead of time of a company on the verge of something huge, wouldn't people be investing in it like crazy? and therefor drive the stock prices up? It seems logical that a stock that small may HAVE potential, but it doesn't right now.
    Professional traders have the same information available as anyone else. Trading on non-public information is illegal. But yes, when a company announces something huge (I.E. Facebook with Oculus Rift ), its stock price will increase. A small company like Replicel though doesn't have the coverage that big companies do for that though. If Phase 2 is succesful you will likely see an increase in its stock price. but I don't think it would be by much.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesst11
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    I've been a professional stock trader for 18 years now. Believe me bro, when the market values a stock like this it means there's not much to get excited about right now. That doesn't mean it can't work, but that there's no such indication at the moment, it's a long shot, based on the market value.
    I don't know too much about stocks, so I probably shouldn't comment, but I will anyway! haha... if professional brokers have the knowledge ahead of time of a company on the verge of something huge, wouldn't people be investing in it like crazy? and therefor drive the stock prices up? It seems logical that a stock that small may HAVE potential, but it doesn't right now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by iaskdumbquestions
    Judging a company's pipeline by its valuation is lunacy, and it works the other way around. A company's valuation should be judged by its pipeline, and, in this case, it could signal REPCF is a buy (Not saying it is - I have never performed a valuation on the company). Our specialized knowledge of hair loss would give us an edge over the pension/hedge/mutual fund guys.

    Maybe I'll put some money into the company and use those gains to finance my treatment.
    I've been a professional stock trader for 18 years now. Believe me bro, when the market values a stock like this it means there's not much to get excited about right now. That doesn't mean it can't work, but that there's no such indication at the moment, it's a long shot, based on the market value.

    Leave a comment:

Working...