Article on piloscopy...

[tedwuji]

I was just rereading the research report that's been discussed on here many times, the same one Dr. Wesley posted, titled "Hair Regeneration from Transected Follicles in Duplicative Surgery: Rate of Success and Cell Populations Involved" and I realized that the two portions of the follicle that they implanted in balding scalp had growth rates of 69% and 73% while the entire follicle had a growth rate of 79% at 12 months. That's damn near donor doubling, I bet this the study Nigam was trying to replicate using FUE which is much much harder than it would be with Pilofocus, and because Nigam is a fake doctor he couldn't achieve anything. I think, it may be harder to do every day in practice, but we could see close to 100% regeneration in surgery when this technique is perfected. Maybe it won't be in the next few years, but I fully believe it's possible based on this study as well as some of the studies this one references. I was reading something Dr. Cole's representative 35yrsafter posted about him believing we will see 90-100% regeneration in the next few years, he must be basing that off of this study as well: very impressive, very exciting potential. To be honest, I don't know how there wouldn't be regeneration, I wonder if it was accidentally seen by Dr. Wesley originally because he was cutting at various depths in the same manner that this study essentially could be splitting the follicle horizontally out of the body.

ive heard a lot of studies claiming donor doubling. Acell back in 2011 and etc.

Would be great if he could but if not, lowered transection rates and elimination of significant scarring is worth every minute of attention this technique receives, in my opinion.

[hellouser]

Relax, it wont be until 2017-2018, if it happens at all (Lot's of things can go wrong).

Enjoy your youth while you have it.

There's no YOUTH to be enjoyed while bald or balding.

[joachim]

I was just rereading the research report that's been discussed on here many times, the same one Dr. Wesley posted, titled "Hair Regeneration from Transected Follicles in Duplicative Surgery: Rate of Success and Cell Populations Involved" and I realized that the two portions of the follicle that they implanted in balding scalp had growth rates of 69% and 73% while the entire follicle had a growth rate of 79% at 12 months. That's damn near donor doubling, I bet this the study Nigam was trying to replicate using FUE which is much much harder than it would be with Pilofocus, and because Nigam is a fake doctor he couldn't achieve anything. I think, it may be harder to do every day in practice, but we could see close to 100% regeneration in surgery when this technique is perfected. Maybe it won't be in the next few years, but I fully believe it's possible based on this study as well as some of the studies this one references. I was reading something Dr. Cole's representative 35yrsafter posted about him believing we will see 90-100% regeneration in the next few years, he must be basing that off of this study as well: very impressive, very exciting potential. To be honest, I don't know how there wouldn't be regeneration, I wonder if it was accidentally seen by Dr. Wesley originally because he was cutting at various depths in the same manner that this study essentially could be splitting the follicle horizontally out of the body.

but what about hair diameter? nobody dares talking about that. if i remember correctly, the resulted hair diameter in both halves in these studies was always 30 to 40% smaller. 30% decrease in hair diameter means 50% less cross section, thus 50% less volume. the hair then looks much thinner, and is not really useful. if you consider 70 to 80% success rate compared to 90% normal FUE success rate, then the regenerated hairs gives even less total hair volume than FUE.
thus, if the regenerated follicle halves don't have nearly the same original diameter, then it's practically useless. so i think, donor regeneration will always be pointless, even with pilofocus. (unless Acell can increase the DP cell population to keep the hair diameter constant)

[tedwuji]

but what about hair diameter? nobody dares talking about that. if i remember correctly, the resulted hair diameter in both halves in these studies was always 30 to 40% smaller. 30% decrease in hair diameter means 50% less cross section, thus 50% less volume. the hair then looks much thinner, and is not really useful. if you consider 70 to 80% success rate compared to 90% normal FUE success rate, then the regenerated hairs gives even less total hair volume than FUE.
thus, if the regenerated follicle halves don't have nearly the same original diameter, then it's practically useless. so i think, donor regeneration will always be pointless, even with pilofocus. (unless Acell can increase the DP cell population to keep the hair diameter constant)

Yeah some of this appears to be simply splitting a follicle and both halves survive but are essentially 50% original size. this is splitting, not duplicating.

but again i say: lower transection rates and elimination of scarring. these two factors alone will bring Wesley my money.

[FearTheLoss]

but what about hair diameter? nobody dares talking about that. if i remember correctly, the resulted hair diameter in both halves in these studies was always 30 to 40% smaller. 30% decrease in hair diameter means 50% less cross section, thus 50% less volume. the hair then looks much thinner, and is not really useful. if you consider 70 to 80% success rate compared to 90% normal FUE success rate, then the regenerated hairs gives even less total hair volume than FUE.
thus, if the regenerated follicle halves don't have nearly the same original diameter, then it's practically useless. so i think, donor regeneration will always be pointless, even with pilofocus. (unless Acell can increase the DP cell population to keep the hair diameter constant)

No in this study it the hair caliber in each half was 96% of that of the entire follicle that was intact..so basically no notable difference

[tedwuji]

No in this study it the hair caliber in each half was 96% of that of the entire follicle that was intact..so basically no notable difference

we'll see i guess. heard this with Acell tho.

[FearTheLoss]

we'll see i guess. heard this with Acell tho.

When did acell ever get any documented results like this? in a large, controlled, published study?

[tedwuji]

When did acell ever get any documented results like this? in a large, controlled, published study?

can u link referenced study plz

[FearTheLoss]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19438685

[tedwuji]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19438685

anyway i can review this study without paying for membership privileges? though i'm not sure how impressive it can be considering N=28.

[lacazette]

It would be cool if one of his few patient could come here to give us his impressions and feelings about the procedure
I'm sure there's one of them who already checks balding forums ^^

[Replicel55]

Where is pilofocus today? Is it on market?

[tedwuji]

Where is pilofocus today? Is it on market?

lol....come on man, dont be THAT GUY.

did u read any of this thread?

[JayM]

lol....come on man, dont be THAT GUY.

did u read any of this thread?

This. You only have to go back like a page to find out what's happening. But no the first trials are beginning hopefully by the end of this month.

[hellouser]

This. You only have to go back like a page to find out what's happening. But no the first trials are beginning hopefully by the end of this month.

They will be delayed for whatever reasons. You can bet on it.