Yeah of course, French technology is the best. France will come up with a cure for hair loss.
the west does not respect that France.
À quand remonte la dernière fois un pays asiatique est sorti avec quelques innové et pas copié des États-Unis. Quels sont les produits les plus populaires que nous utilisons qui a été créé par un pays asiatique.
: (
2023 au plus tôt? C'est décourageant. Je vais être marié avec des enfants alors, et la perte de cheveux serai mais une préoccupation passagère. VDM
With regards to timelines, we all know how that goes but I personally believe a working cell therapy will be in trials by 2020 the latest and by 2022-2023 we'll have it available to patients at least in Japan. A working cell therapy is defined as converting a NW7 to NW1 with a very high density engineered DHT-resistant hair follicles.
Not good enough. 6 years for trials to start? 9 years (and possibly more) to get a treatment? None of us should wait that long.
Not good enough. 6 years for trials to start? 9 years (and possibly more) to get a treatment? None of us should wait that long.
Trials have to start this year.
It will start when it is able to start. Nothing is going to change just because you say "it haves to start this year." None of these companies joined the race to lose.
It will start when it is able to start. Nothing is going to change just because you say "it haves to start this year." None of these companies joined the race to lose.
So whats your hypothesis that trials cant start now, now that they've got everything in place to reverse baldness completely?
How come this isn't all over the news "Baldness cure found" ???
I'm anxious to read that part where it says ",but it's still in the experimental stage, and much work is needed to be done. 10 more years until human trials."
How come this isn't all over the news "Baldness cure found" ???
I'm anxious to read that part where it says ",but it's still in the experimental stage, and much work is needed to be done. 10 more years until human trials."
Because it's not a cure. It's just ANOTHER false-hope article about some research team who CLAIM to have done something amazing but as usual nothing will come of it, because, as fate would have it, we are still around 40 years of research away from even beginning to develop a decent treatment for hair loss.
If you decide to spend the next 40 years following hair loss research I can guarantee you one thing: hundreds if not thousands of articles like this one, but nothing more... just articles... articles articles articles articles, you're [all] living a dream in the mythical world of journalism, I suggest you wake up and realise we are all half a century away (if not more) from even beginning to think about a cure for hair loss.
So whats your hypothesis that trials cant start now, now that they've got everything in place to reverse baldness completely?
You assume that everything is in place, but we are on the outside peaking in through a hazy window. You don't know all the problems behind the scene.
It isn't like a math test where you have 10 problems and you know you need to find 10 solutions. These researchers have to trial and error and once they fix one problem another may pop up.
If everything was in place, why wouldn't they move forward? Whoever fund these researchers definitely set deadlines and expect progress so you don't have to worry if its going fast enough. It is going as fast as it can, its business after all.
Originally posted by UK_
Because it's not a cure. It's just ANOTHER false-hope article about some research team who CLAIM to have done something amazing but as usual nothing will come of it, because, as fate would have it, we are still around 40 years of research away from even beginning to develop a decent treatment for hair loss.
If you decide to spend the next 40 years following hair loss research I can guarantee you one thing: hundreds if not thousands of articles like this one, but nothing more... just articles... articles articles articles articles, you're [all] living a dream in the mythical world of journalism, I suggest you wake up and realise we are all half a century away (if not more) from even beginning to think about a cure for hair loss.
Dude, if you confident there won't be a cure for 40 years then get away from this forum and move forward with your life. What are you antagonizing for, do you secretly hope that we convince that what you think is wrong? I don't see the logic of why you would stay on this forum.
At least, support your ridiculously bold claims with actual evidence. You won't do that? OK then, we'll just ignore your posts.
Let's not attack UK_, he's deeply unhappy. A while ago he PM'd me on another forum saying he only trolls because he's depressed. Just ignore/humour him guys.
Comment