Final Days: Chinese Scientists Have Solved the DP Culturing Problem! (2014)

[Sogeking]

We've probably been searching for a cure since not long after our species existed though, and now we could be in the final year or two before its at least proven in theory that baldness can be cured. I'd say on a relative timescale we're justified in measuring it in days.

Hmm I won't be calling it final until we have something going to clinical trials and being announced as going to clinical trials. But seriously how can we find out the status about the Chinese and Taiwanese trials?

[HairBane]

All in favor of changing the thread title to "Final Years: ..."

We've probably been searching for a cure since not long after our species existed though, and now we could be in the final year or two before its at least proven in theory that baldness can be cured. I'd say on a relative timescale we're justified in measuring it in days.

[mmmcoffee]

All in favor of changing the thread title to "Final Years: ..."

[HairBane]

The amount of cringe beta self esteem issue riddled, bitter woman-hating laden posts in a thread about dermal papilla expansion in culture is... Unsurprising. Shall we get back on topic you numpties?

Does anyone know when the Chinese trials start.? And is anyone involved in the Chinese trials also involved in the hair conference?

[nameless]

No, that's a big misconception. It takes only a few years to start losing hair, if that. Young boys that are genetically programmed to lose hair in their late teens and early twenties do so once they go through puberty. After puberty finishes, testosterone and DHT levels are no longer absent like they were as a boy. Hairloss then slowly begins. Are you trying to tell me that hairloss starts as a baby and finally takes the upper hand after twenty years or so? No, that's just incorrect.

Interesting.

But it's also true that puberty starts for different boys at different ages and ends at different ages. And even after hair loss starts it takes awhile for the damage to start damaging a person's looks. Dermatologists say that we are missing about 20% of our hair before we even notice. And as you age you produce less of the hormones that take your hair. You would not need to be retreated more than every 5 - 10 years even if the new hair was susceptible to androgen if they can turn the clock back on the new hair to the point where it was at before it started falling out.

[nameless]

The amount of women hating misogynistic posts on the bald truth is too damn high...

You guys do realize that you are saying women are shallow and superficial bitches, while simultaneously complaining you can't get a hot, well-off girlfriend/wife? If you can't see the Hypocrisy in that then the IQ level here is lower than I thought.

* Shallow and superficial mean the same thing so your point that we think women are shallow and superficial is redundant. I will use the word shallow in my response to you for the sake of economy and clarity.

* You lack wisdom and since you have this deficit your putting our statements into a construct of your own invention rather than how we ourselves intended for them to be construed.

* Most of us understand that people in general, and women specifically, are not the sum total of their negative parts. yes, we all have negative parts - me, you, all men, and all women. We all have negative parts. Everybody. But we also have positive parts. Are women shallow? Yes. And they have other negative traits too. But they also have some positive charming traits. On balance, we are better off with them in our lives than without them in our lives. Indeed, the men with women in their lives live longer and have healthier lives.

http://cleveland.cbslocal.com/2012/11/14/study-married-couples-live-longer-healthier-lives-than-singles/

* I don't recall any person here posting the words "Shallow and superficial bitches" in connection with women, except you. I do not think of women as "bitches" although I do believe that they have a propensity for making shallow decisions when it comes to the mating decisions they make about men. And by the way I've seen many scientific studies that support my belief. Here is one such study you might find noteworthy:

http://blog.timesunion.com/ontheedge/women-5-times-more-likely-to-go-for-men-with-hair/9687/

[tonypizza]

I have a hot girlfriend. Next..

[garethbale]

The amount of women hating misogynistic posts on the bald truth is too damn high...

You guys do realize that you are saying women are shallow and superficial bitches, while simultaneously complaining you can't get a hot, well-off girlfriend/wife? If you can't see the Hypocrisy in that then the IQ level here is lower than I thought.

hahaha

I thought this too. I guess the irony is lost on people here

[fred970]

Then what on earth were you complaining about in your earlier posts?

[cichlidfort]

The amount of women hating misogynistic posts on the bald truth is too damn high...

You guys do realize that you are saying women are shallow and superficial bitches, while simultaneously complaining you can't get a hot, well-off girlfriend/wife? If you can't see the Hypocrisy in that then the IQ level here is lower than I thought.

I have a hot girlfriend. Next..

[cichlidfort]

Can science turn the clock back on hair cells?

Everyone should know that science has found a way to turn back the clock on stem cells and if they can do the same thing for hair cells then it seems like that would mean new hair from cultured hair cells would be good for about 20 years since it takes about 20 years to start losing hair.

http://www.news.gatech.edu/2011/09/2...em-cells-aging

No, that's a big misconception. It takes only a few years to start losing hair, if that. Young boys that are genetically programmed to lose hair in their late teens and early twenties do so once they go through puberty. After puberty finishes, testosterone and DHT levels are no longer absent like they were as a boy. Hairloss then slowly begins. Are you trying to tell me that hairloss starts as a baby and finally takes the upper hand after twenty years or so? No, that's just incorrect.

[nameless]

Can science turn the clock back on hair cells?

Everyone should know that science has found a way to turn back the clock on stem cells and if they can do the same thing for hair cells then it seems like that would mean new hair from cultured hair cells would be good for about 20 years since it takes about 20 years to start losing hair.

Here's a link to reports that science has achieved turning the clock back on stem cells. I figure most people know about this accomplishment but a few people might not.

http://www.news.gatech.edu/2011/09/20/scientists-turn-back-clock-adult-stem-cells-aging

[greatjob!]

The amount of women hating misogynistic posts on the bald truth is too damn high...

You guys do realize that you are saying women are shallow and superficial bitches, while simultaneously complaining you can't get a hot, well-off girlfriend/wife? If you can't see the Hypocrisy in that then the IQ level here is lower than I thought.

[hellouser]

whats the latest on the actual thread topic? I keep going back various pages but its ppl arguing haha

Other than the first few pages and some input from Desmond, there's nothing else to tell you.

Hair loss research is snail pace research... and so is squeezing out info from researchers and biotechs. I'd recommend emailing the individuals involved with research.

[goldbondmafia]

whats the latest on the actual thread topic? I keep going back various pages but its ppl arguing haha