Sm04554

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cartech78
    replied
    I know it sucks that this study didnt produce better results , part of me was hoping for more then we got too, but every time companies do these studies more is learned then we knew before and i believe that it inches us closer to a cure. Picture what 10 hairs would look like in a 1cm square looks like! That is better in my opinon then what minoxidil has ever done for me .

    Leave a comment:


  • Hubris
    replied
    Originally posted by Trouse5858
    Ten hairs on a 1 cm squared surface area. That's not great but it's something. Dosing looks like it could be an issue though.
    Yes, ten hairs in a 1cm squared surface area. Let's be realistic, these results are a massive disappointment, and it's unlikely now that this drug will ever come to market.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sogeking
    replied
    Thats it. Unless Histogen wasn't fudging with their results despite their pictures being suspicious, no upcoming treatments are gonna matter that much. The results from SM are lackluster.
    We're gonna have to wait for Tsuji or LAusters team to produce new hair follicles in lab which is like 10+ years away.
    Since Bimatoprost, Sm, CB and Seti haven't really shown us anything worth noting I think it is time for me to shave it off and try to go off the forums...

    Leave a comment:


  • Trouse5858
    replied
    Originally posted by Hubris
    They grew less than ten hairs.
    Ten hairs on a 1 cm squared surface area. That's not great but it's something. Dosing looks like it could be an issue though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cartech78
    replied
    10 in a 1cm square area , they also did not metion if it made other existing hair stronger. I never expected this to be a cure , im just looking for a little more help then what is out there already. Besides growing 10 hairs is a start, its better then growing 0.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hubris
    replied
    Originally posted by Cartech78
    Yeah ,not as good as i was hoping for but who knows , this drug used with fin and minoxidil , maybe they have somoething
    They grew less than ten hairs.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cartech78
    replied
    Yeah ,not as good as i was hoping for but who knows , this drug used with fin and minoxidil , maybe they have somoething

    Leave a comment:


  • Swooping
    replied
    Very lackluster results guys... Really sucks, hope that is a troll post from forbes.

    Leave a comment:


  • machi
    replied
    Please , publish any news that is known today samumed . I'll read to you from Spain . Fingers crossed because we have good news.

    Leave a comment:


  • IvanXproject
    replied
    The day has come. Is anyone here attending?

    Leave a comment:


  • Alias123
    replied
    Updates from yesterday?

    Leave a comment:


  • Tenma
    replied
    If sm could give a full min result to a large group of people that would be incredible. Mins growth potential isn't really the issue. It's the response rate
    Couldnt agree more.

    Leave a comment:


  • dm90
    replied
    Last thing I'll say is that if expect any results from this drug to be greatly increased with fin. We've all heard the "releasing the breaks and stepping on the accelerator" analogy. Well dht inhibits the pathway and sm supposively up regulates it. That actually fits the comparison exactly.

    Leave a comment:


  • dm90
    replied
    If this is only a slight upgrade from minoxidil that would still be massavie. You have to remember minoxidil works wonders for a small percent of people. If sm could give a full min result to a large group of people that would be incredible. Mins growth potential isn't really the issue. It's the response rate

    Leave a comment:


  • dm90
    replied
    Originally posted by kantian
    Wasn't Propecia that expensive when it was first sold? Some people still pay $60/mo ($720/yr) for their generic finasteride. I'd be willing to pay that much and more. That's not a difficult amount of money to acquire for most people in rich countries.
    Propecia was like 120-150 when it came out. Aesthetic topical tend to be very expensive, look at acne treatments. If this is effective and comes out I'd expect at least 150 a month. Hell I don't care though

    Leave a comment:

Working...