TAKEAWAY FROM WCHR 2013 Edinburgh, UK @ Dr. NIGAM

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 534623
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 1854

    #31
    Originally posted by ccmethinning
    Hahahaha those pictures are hilarious. All the people Nigam is taking pictures with have that WTF look on their faces. Like "who the **** is this guy and why am I taking a picture with him?"
    Are you sure?


    Oh well, they will regret these (marketing-)snapshots [to impress kids] soon ...

    By the way - is Dr. Cotsarelis losing his hair or is it just the lightning?
    Anyway, it doesn't matter. The guy who will cure him is next to him...lol

    Comment

    • Kiwi
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 1087

      #32
      Originally posted by ccmethinning
      Hahahaha those pictures are hilarious. All the people Nigam is taking pictures with have that WTF look on their faces. Like "who the **** is this guy and why am I taking a picture with him?"
      Most conference photos are like that.

      Good job Nigram. I hope you blow Dr Gho's technique to smithereens - if your technique becomes the gold standard you'll be our hero!!!

      You can always move to a country like New Zealand that doesn't recognise archaic American patent laws ;P

      Oh wait. You already do!!! Hazah!!!!

      Comment

      • 534623
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2011
        • 1854

        #33
        Originally posted by Kiwi

        Most conference photos are like that.
        No - that is not true ...

        Comment

        • Arashi
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 3888

          #34
          Originally posted by ccmethinning
          Hahahaha those pictures are hilarious. All the people Nigam is taking pictures with have that WTF look on their faces. Like "who the **** is this guy and why am I taking a picture with him?"
          LOL. But then again, it IS nice that he actually went there and fed back some things to this forum.

          Comment

          • Conpecia
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2011
            • 904

            #35
            [QUOTE=drnigams;121938]http://www.google.com/patents/EP2153836A1?cl=en
            The above link to patent for topical finasteride should help.
            You can contact the company directly.
            If we have any pharmacist ,skin permeation expert as forum member..they can be of help.
            I will work on it..give me some time .

            Originally posted by UK_
            Topical finasteride looks good, 71% scalp DHT reduction with low systemic absorbtion, any ideas when this will be available Dr Nigam and where we can get our hands on it?

            I think the dermal sheat cells is a good shout from Jahoda, do you think you could apply the 3D spheroidal DP culture with Dermal SHEAThttp
            Looks like we could see a topical blend of minox and fin with this new "film" as a vehicle. That'd make things so easy just apply it and move on. Man this can't come soon enough.

            Comment

            • rdawg
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2012
              • 996

              #36
              Would topical fin have to go through the same regulations being as finasteride is already proven safe?

              wouldnt it just need a 1 year phase III kind of trial?

              someone tell me how this would work, would love to get topical fin, not that i'm having issues with regular fin.

              Wouldn't it work better too since it would be more localised/direct to the scalp?

              Comment

              • FearTheLoss
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2012
                • 1581

                #37
                Originally posted by rdawg
                Would topical fin have to go through the same regulations being as finasteride is already proven safe?

                wouldnt it just need a 1 year phase III kind of trial?

                someone tell me how this would work, would love to get topical fin, not that i'm having issues with regular fin.

                Wouldn't it work better too since it would be more localised/direct to the scalp?
                Hasson and Wong already get it for their patients....not sure what we can do in the USA

                Comment

                • DepressedByHairLoss
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2011
                  • 854

                  #38
                  Originally posted by 534623
                  No - that is not true ...
                  Haha, that cracked me up. People like her have been tinkering with mice for decades but have not done a damn thing to benefit humans.

                  Comment

                  • DepressedByHairLoss
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2011
                    • 854

                    #39
                    I really do salute Dr. Nigam very much though. He is really trying to give us less-invasive and just better options to regrow hair, and not just simply offering the same old tired FUT surgery.

                    Comment

                    • drnigams
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2012
                      • 551

                      #40
                      rdawg,
                      Doctors can prescribe off label use of topical finasteride since it is approved by FDA for oral use..
                      Like doctors prescribe lattise(a product of allergan) off label as it has been approved by FDA,USA for growing eyelashes.
                      Silicion fillers have been cleared by FDA for opthalmic use,and doctors in USA are using it for permanent fillers for face through microdroplet technique.
                      In INDIA,doctors can compound and dispense a new formulation,provided every ingredient has an FDA approval and bought from FDA registered supplier.But cannot keep this formulation in the pharmacy for general public unless cleared by FDA for it's claims.
                      That means ,i can compound and dispense to my patients from my clinic or by courier once i find the right solution and vehicle of topical finasteride.
                      Although this has to be for use of individual patient and not for sale in the market..
                      If a company launches this product as a drug than minimum it has to do,is prove it's efficacy with trials before FDA allows it's claim...

                      Originally posted by rdawg
                      Would topical fin have to go through the same regulations being as finasteride is already proven safe?

                      wouldnt it just need a 1 year phase III kind of trial?

                      someone tell me how this would work, would love to get topical fin, not that i'm having issues with regular fin.

                      Wouldn't it work better too since it would be more localised/direct to the scalp?

                      Comment

                      • MrBlonde
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2012
                        • 261

                        #41
                        Originally posted by drnigams
                        rdawg,
                        Doctors can prescribe off label use of topical finasteride since it is approved by FDA for oral use..
                        Like doctors prescribe lattise(a product of allergan) off label as it has been approved by FDA,USA for growing eyelashes.
                        Silicion fillers have been cleared by FDA for opthalmic use,and doctors in USA are using it for permanent fillers for face through microdroplet technique.
                        In INDIA,doctors can compound and dispense a new formulation,provided every ingredient has an FDA approval and bought from FDA registered supplier.But cannot keep this formulation in the pharmacy for general public unless cleared by FDA for it's claims.
                        That means ,i can compound and dispense to my patients from my clinic or by courier once i find the right solution and vehicle of topical finasteride.
                        Although this has to be for use of individual patient and not for sale in the market..

                        If a company launches this product as a drug than minimum it has to do,is prove it's efficacy with trials before FDA allows it's claim...
                        So you will do your own testing to find the right solution? We are talking months of testing and patient results then before you send out your own topical Fin?

                        How quickly do you think you can have batches ready to send?

                        Comment

                        • Arashi
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2012
                          • 3888

                          #42
                          Originally posted by drnigams
                          rdawg,
                          If a company launches this product as a drug than minimum it has to do,is prove it's efficacy with trials before FDA allows it's claim...
                          Yup. Minimum is a phase III trial to prove efficacy. So probably a 2 year timeframe before we'll see it on the market.

                          Comment

                          • drnigams
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2012
                            • 551

                            #43
                            Blonde, my major focus of work at present is donor doubling and injections of growth factors,stemcells,and dp cultured cells..whatever time will be left ..i will work on thsi..but any guy into phd on skin permeation will be a better bet to prepare than me..i will also be discussing with experts in skin permeation,the swiss company and also annika voidt from germany ,who's research work is into targetted drug delivery... to prepare the formulation.
                            Originally posted by MrBlonde
                            So you will do your own testing to find the right solution? We are talking months of testing and patient results then before you send out your own topical Fin?

                            How quickly do you think you can have batches ready to send?

                            Comment

                            • drnigams
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2012
                              • 551

                              #44
                              Arashi,did you have a look at three studies i posted at hs proving our hypothesis of donor doubling...wherein lower follicle if amputated can regenerate it's own dermal papilla...infact there was a paper on unlimited follicle hair transplant at WCHR...these findings confirm til HM comes doubling is the best solution...
                              Originally posted by Arashi
                              Yup. Minimum is a phase III trial to prove efficacy. So probably a 2 year timeframe before we'll see it on the market.

                              Comment

                              • rdawg
                                Senior Member
                                • Jun 2012
                                • 996

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Arashi
                                Yup. Minimum is a phase III trial to prove efficacy. So probably a 2 year timeframe before we'll see it on the market.
                                essentially for on label yes, but off label we can get this stuff much sooner than that.

                                that's still not that far, but i'm not sure I got an answer to my other question, would the efficacy be better(at least in theory) than regular oral fin since it's more localised to the hair? or would it essentially have the same effect?

                                Comment

                                Working...