Dr Nigams - NSN Donor regeneration!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 534623
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 1854

    #91
    Originally posted by didi

    if dr nigam really delivers what he promissed(doubling+real HM)
    Do you know what he claimed BEFORE he ever mentioned the first time "doubling"?

    Pffffff...

    Here is what you yourself reported just a few month ago ...
    Originally posted by didi

    Comment

    • Arashi
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2012
      • 3888

      #92
      Originally posted by 534623

      "This domain name expired on Apr 02 2013 12:13PM
      Click here to renew it."

      LOOOOL. Quickly, who can register his domain, this should be FUN

      Comment

      • Arashi
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2012
        • 3888

        #93
        Hehe, j/k-ing, not going to steal his domain. But man, pay your bills in time Dr Nigam.

        Comment

        • 534623
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2011
          • 1854

          #94
          Originally posted by Arashi
          "This domain name expired on Apr 02 2013 12:13PM
          Click here to renew it."
          At least didi's uploaded pics are still there (besides all my own screen shots from "the early Nigam-days" including all the bold claims):

          Comment

          • 534623
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2011
            • 1854

            #95
            Originally posted by Arashi
            Hehe, j/k-ing, not going to steal his domain. But man, pay your bills in time Dr Nigam.
            Sorry - he can't; buying "trail subjects" is costly ...

            I wonder how long it will take until we have to donate and to send packed lunchs to Dr. Nigam's house. I think I will donate every week 1 Wiener Schnitzel and some Leberkässemmel.

            Comment

            • didi
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2011
              • 1360

              #96
              look guys

              dr nigam started off on da wrong foot, no doubt abt it but we dont need to dwell on it,
              he is improving rapidly,

              judge him on nsn results, he is not nigams man and thats the most important thing for us to know

              Comment

              • Arashi
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2012
                • 3888

                #97
                Originally posted by didi
                judge him on nsn results
                Which uptil now we have NOT seen (except for that area around that mole, but that's the obvious area to conduct fraud on).

                Comment

                • Arashi
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 3888

                  #98
                  And is it only me who finds it VERY fishy that Dr Nigam posted pre-op pictures of NSN's scalp, but NOT of the donor area and now has supposedly has mailed these pictures to NSN ? Why not post them immediately after surgery ? With all the photoshopping from the past, this really is not going to make the case any stronger ...

                  Comment

                  • didi
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 1360

                    #99
                    arashi

                    ok , how do you think dr nigam will 'fake' reciopient area, NSN is expecting 1200 or so grafts to grow....

                    as for donor 1200 extractions will show 1200 white fue dots if theres no regeneration, nsn is dark skinned man, fue dots will stand out...


                    very hard case to commit fraud UNLESS he bribed NSN

                    Comment

                    • hellouser
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2012
                      • 4419

                      Originally posted by Arashi
                      Sure. He posted these 2 on his website:



                      If you compare them, the before and after photo are EXACTLY the same, pixel for pixel, except the hair, LOL.
                      Thank you.

                      First set has to be photoshopped, however there are two distinct differences; obviously the hair but theres also a very faint mark down the middle of his forehead and a little to the left. You'll only see it if alternating between the before/after photographs when theyre overlaid. Otherwise, the lighting, angle and DOF are exactly the same. That's almost TOO good for consistency... even I as a pro photographer can't accomplish that in two takes separated days apart. Even the eyebrows are exactly the same.

                      The second set looks like bad use of the clone too to give the impression of bokeh (depth of field which makes objects further away more blurred out.... are you listening, IronMan? This is where photography knowledge comes in, something which you know squat about). However, the image on the right is larger. Scaling it down did show a very very similar result as the one on the left, but not 100%.

                      Still, this before/after doctoring of photographs isn't any different than say, Kellogg's taking photographs of a bowl of cereal, they use GLUE instead of milk and place the corn flakes very strategically. McDonald's goes to great lengths as well to adjust their photographs too before theyre marketed, watch this as it explains everything:


                      Now I know these tactics are unethical and really shady for hair loss sufferers, but this 'trickery' exists everywhere. I just hope this was done innocently with good intentions whilst still having a legitimate solution for hair doubling.

                      Comment

                      • Arashi
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 3888

                        Originally posted by hellouser
                        Now I know these tactics are really shady for hair loss sufferers, but this 'trickery' exists everywhere.
                        A good, honest doctor is not going to use 'trickery' like this. I'm sure in any Western country, having photoshopped pictures on your website like this is enough to have your medical license retracted.

                        HOWEVER I'm willing to forget all about this, once we see SOLID proof of what he claims he can do. Until now we've seen none.

                        Comment

                        • 534623
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2011
                          • 1854

                          Originally posted by hellouser

                          The second set looks like bad use of the clone too to give the impression of bokeh (depth of field which makes objects further away more blurred out.... are you listening, IronMan? This is where photography knowledge comes in...
                          Sure. Have you EVER checked out ...
                          And here is one of Dr. Nigam's extremely fraudulent claims about Dr. Gho's work... And here you can see in detail what Dr. Nigam, in fact, did in this photo: Dr. Nigam simply made lots of blue circles everywhere in an area behind neversaynever's ear - an area, which simply doesn't (naturally) have a high follicle density


                          ... this fraud?

                          Comment

                          • hellouser
                            Senior Member
                            • May 2012
                            • 4419

                            Originally posted by Arashi
                            A good, honest doctor is not going to use 'trickery' like this. I'm sure in any Western country, having photoshopped pictures on your website like this is enough to have your medical license retracted.

                            HOWEVER I'm willing to forget all about this, once we see SOLID proof of what he claims he can do. Until now we've seen none.
                            Yes its unethical, but its not illegal. I don't approve of this for health related concerns. Obviously for food no one will care about as its just food, but to give people false impressions or implied empty promises through their website... I won't stand for that... and I work in marketing, and most of the time I feel like a cheap shill doing all this creative work (though not at the moment as I'm in publishing, next job will be either teaching or for a non-profit, gonna put my skills to help others).

                            Comment

                            • Arashi
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2012
                              • 3888

                              Originally posted by hellouser
                              McDonald's goes to great lengths as well to adjust their photographs too before theyre marketed, watch this as it explains everything:
                              I just watched your video. You really think that styling a hamburger somewhat is exactly the same as photoshopping hair of you 'patients' as a demonstration of your technique, to lure in customers to come to your clinic to have that procedure performed on them ? You don't think this is something TOTALLY different ?

                              Comment

                              • 534623
                                Senior Member
                                • Oct 2011
                                • 1854

                                Originally posted by Arashi
                                A good, honest doctor is not going to use 'trickery' like this. I'm sure in any Western country, having photoshopped pictures on your website like this is enough to have your medical license retracted.
                                Seriously, it really doesn't matter which country - no serious doctor, researcher, scientist on this planet exhibits such a behavior.

                                Comment

                                Working...