Dr Nigams - NSN Donor regeneration!

[didi]

why there is so many Gho fanboys on this site, acting like bunch of kids


2013 will be dr nigams year, mark my words

[Arashi]

why there is so many Gho fanboys on this site, acting like bunch of kids

2013 will be dr nigams year, mark my words

We've seen evidence of Gho's technique. We've seen none of Dr Nigam. Maybe he's for real, maybe not, but until then, YOU are the only fanboy in this thread.

[didi]

dr nigam

i dont think you should waste your valuable time on SKYPE with people from hair loss forums, especially IM
you gonna get drawn into convo with people that dont matter, they are not scientists,
they cant see bigger picture

focus on HM/doubling, keep experimenting and the rest will take care of itself

[Arashi]

dr nigam

i dont think you should waste your valuable time on SKYPE with people from hair loss forums, especially IM
you gonna get drawn into convo with people that dont matter, they are not scientists,
they cant see bigger picture

focus on HM/doubling, keep experimenting and the rest will take care of itself

Agreed. And if you're really desperate for advice, you can always just call Didi, the brightest kid in the room.

[didi]

Didi is neutral, unbiased, even though you may think im rooting for nigam but Im not like iron man, who is irrational, closed minded fanboy


i dont really care which camp wins,



*do you think ironman and joe from staten island would make good friends?

[Arashi]

Didi is neutral, unbiased, even though you may think im rooting for nigam but Im not like iron man, who is irrational, closed minded fanboy

Ironman in my opinion is Gho-biased, although he denies that of course himself. BUT he was the first one to present us solid evidence of Gho's technique. All you have done is make absurd claims and requests regarding Gho's evidence. And then Dr Nigam just presents a photo of the birthmark site, which could be cheated on in several different ways, and you present that as if it was THE breakthrough evidence you've been waiting for. And you see yourself as unbiased ?

[didi]

NSN is not nigams man? he is old forum member..unless nigam bribed him,

these regrowth pic around bmark are taken by NSN?

nsn seems happy, its a positive thing


we still need detailed analysis of recipient - hasci and nigam needs to be scrutinized and put under spotlight

every doc have their loyal fanboy who blindly follows, gho has iron man, dr woods have diamond6, dr umar has a few i think....

arashi
can you explain why is it that Ironman never seemed interested in looking at recipient and is so stubbornly obsessed with overnalaizing donor??
when its clear that without looking at BOTH you cant prove sh!tt

[534623]

Be ready there will be at least 25 case studies with documentation in 2013 on hair doubling followed with hair tripling,followed with HM+plus dp culture (the real old stuff ?). And yes documentation with many independent forum members.

Yes, more than 50 years old stuff.
But I don't expect that you know all this - I mean, everything about the history around culturing of dermal papilla cells and dermal papilla studies since more than 50 years - until today.

Just a well-known example (Intercytex/Dr. Jerry Cooley) ...

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2884703/

Often tried - never reached ...

btw - I find especially the following part from this "study" highly comical:

"FCI [follicular cell implantation] has often been referred to by the misnomers hair cloning or hair multiplication. These terms are misleading and fail to accurately describe what is meant by follicular cell implantation. In FCI, new follicles are induced by the cultured DP cells in conjunction with existing epidermis in the scalp, so that new follicles are a combination of the implanted cells and target epidermis. DP cells are not cloned, nor are whole follicles multiplied, although the idea that many new follicles are formed is correct."

But who the hell is talking today about "FCI"??

Here is what the father of "Hair Multiplication" has to say ...

http://www.fileden.com/files/2012/3/15/3278666/What-is-Hair-Multiplication.wmv

Furthermore, I didn't know that you can't call normal 'cell division' OR provoked cell division due to culturing of cells as "cloning" of cells, because what else is it, if you try to get (in vivo or in vitro) more cells from a certain number of cells (parent cells) - especially, when these cells produce genetically completely identical daughter cells?
But who cares ...

[Arashi]

NSN is not nigams man? he is old forum member..unless nigam bribed him,

these regrowth pic around bmark are taken by NSN?

Really ? Look I work as a stock trader. I see fraud all the time, especially in asian (chinese) companies. Whenever such company releases a press event stating that they're going to 'better their lives' and release all requested documentation to the SEC, then that means NOTHING to me. Because if you were a fraud and you would want people to buy your stock, wouldn't you say the same thing ?

Now I'm not saying Dr Nigam is a fraud. I'm just saying that after all that has happened, with the photoshopped picture on his website and the lies about his weightloss clinic, that we need to see SOLID evidence.

You present the birthmark photo as evidence, but what would you do if you were a fraud ? Wouldn't you just simulate extraction around that birthmark and leave the whole graft in tact ? That is why we need to see both pre-op photo's and post-op photo's of the WHOLE donor area.

At this point I'm just wondering if you're too stupid to understand all this or just too naive.

[One]

Dr Nigam we are all with you, keep it up to show clear photos.

Keep prices low for those in the forum, please.

Compliments.

[534623]

"FCI [follicular cell implantation] has often been referred to by the misnomers hair cloning or hair multiplication. These terms are misleading and fail to accurately describe what is meant by follicular cell implantation."

And what is "Hair Stem Cell Transplantation® (HST)"? lol

[didi]

arashi

same could be said abt gho, he is chinese btw

we havent proven that he isnt scamming people..true? just bc its scarless doesnt mean its what he says it is..most fue doctors think he is hoax

you seem sold on hst but doubt others, i can sense bias...or are you just stpid or naive


nigam is not publicly listed company, doesnt need propaganda to temporarily inflate share prices,
would he be so stupid to waste all his time and money on something he doesnt believe in? he knows that he is under spotlight and needs to deliever, he wont get single western customer unless he is legit, he knows that
he is not crazy to invest all these money into labs, equipment, miscoscope,etc for nothing

[Arashi]

arashi

same could be said abt gho

And that is just not true. This is what I mean, you make all kind of twisted weird statements about Gho, while we have tons of evidence. Look at the 3 extremely well documented and researched treatments of GC83UK. But there are tons of other Gho patients here, some documented their cases, others didnt, but everybody is happy. And you say otherwise ?

[Arashi]

nigam is not publicly listed company, doesnt need propaganda to temporarily inflate share prices,

If Nigam could just get 125 naive people like you to his clinic, charge them $8000 for 2000 grafts, then he's made a million USD, which by Indian standard surely is enough to retire.

[534623]

arashi

same could be said abt gho, he is chinese btw

Really? I didn't know that Dr. Gho is a Chinese.

And that is completely "normal" for you:
Making claims simply out of his ass.

If I would charge you $100 for every misleading claim you make out of your ass - I would be richer than "rich".