Dr Nigams - NSN Donor regeneration!
Collapse
X
-
"This domain name expired on Apr 02 2013 12:13PM
Click here to renew it."
LOOOOL. Quickly, who can register his domain, this should be FUNComment
-
Comment
-
I wonder how long it will take until we have to donate and to send packed lunchs to Dr. Nigam's house. I think I will donate every week 1 Wiener Schnitzel and some Leberkässemmel.Comment
-
And is it only me who finds it VERY fishy that Dr Nigam posted pre-op pictures of NSN's scalp, but NOT of the donor area and now has supposedly has mailed these pictures to NSN ? Why not post them immediately after surgery ? With all the photoshopping from the past, this really is not going to make the case any stronger ...Comment
-
arashi
ok , how do you think dr nigam will 'fake' reciopient area, NSN is expecting 1200 or so grafts to grow....
as for donor 1200 extractions will show 1200 white fue dots if theres no regeneration, nsn is dark skinned man, fue dots will stand out...
very hard case to commit fraud UNLESS he bribed NSNComment
-
Sure. He posted these 2 on his website:
If you compare them, the before and after photo are EXACTLY the same, pixel for pixel, except the hair, LOL.
First set has to be photoshopped, however there are two distinct differences; obviously the hair but theres also a very faint mark down the middle of his forehead and a little to the left. You'll only see it if alternating between the before/after photographs when theyre overlaid. Otherwise, the lighting, angle and DOF are exactly the same. That's almost TOO good for consistency... even I as a pro photographer can't accomplish that in two takes separated days apart. Even the eyebrows are exactly the same.
The second set looks like bad use of the clone too to give the impression of bokeh (depth of field which makes objects further away more blurred out.... are you listening, IronMan? This is where photography knowledge comes in, something which you know squat about). However, the image on the right is larger. Scaling it down did show a very very similar result as the one on the left, but not 100%.
Still, this before/after doctoring of photographs isn't any different than say, Kellogg's taking photographs of a bowl of cereal, they use GLUE instead of milk and place the corn flakes very strategically. McDonald's goes to great lengths as well to adjust their photographs too before theyre marketed, watch this as it explains everything:
Now I know these tactics are unethical and really shady for hair loss sufferers, but this 'trickery' exists everywhere. I just hope this was done innocently with good intentions whilst still having a legitimate solution for hair doubling.Comment
-
HOWEVER I'm willing to forget all about this, once we see SOLID proof of what he claims he can do. Until now we've seen none.Comment
-
And here is one of Dr. Nigam's extremely fraudulent claims about Dr. Gho's work... And here you can see in detail what Dr. Nigam, in fact, did in this photo: Dr. Nigam simply made lots of blue circles everywhere in an area behind neversaynever's ear - an area, which simply doesn't (naturally) have a high follicle density
... this fraud?Comment
-
A good, honest doctor is not going to use 'trickery' like this. I'm sure in any Western country, having photoshopped pictures on your website like this is enough to have your medical license retracted.
HOWEVER I'm willing to forget all about this, once we see SOLID proof of what he claims he can do. Until now we've seen none.Comment
-
McDonald's goes to great lengths as well to adjust their photographs too before theyre marketed, watch this as it explains everything:
Comment
-
Seriously, it really doesn't matter which country - no serious doctor, researcher, scientist on this planet exhibits such a behavior.Comment
Comment