could you provide a source for that? i am seeing lots of statistics and facts being stated on this forum, but they dont mean much without any documents to support them, or if they are being quoted out of context!
can you explain further? you say merck has done its best to conceal and cover up the proof, but is that just your theory? Where is the proof of all this? What false information do they have in their literature?
I see tha tmerck included reports of "difficulty in achieving an erection that continued after stopping the medication" in their brochures, which is much different than "permanent ED" like you put it. Merck in no way said it was permanent, or that it didnt resolve itself shortly after discontinuing. Thats just what you are concluding.
can you explain further? you say merck has done its best to conceal and cover up the proof, but is that just your theory? Where is the proof of all this? What false information do they have in their literature?
I see tha tmerck included reports of "difficulty in achieving an erection that continued after stopping the medication" in their brochures, which is much different than "permanent ED" like you put it. Merck in no way said it was permanent, or that it didnt resolve itself shortly after discontinuing. Thats just what you are concluding.
Comment