ACell, a Current Review of Applications in Hair Transplant Surgery

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • gillenator
    replied
    Anyone feel that Acell has improved their overall yield? It may still be too early in use. Time will tell.

    Leave a comment:


  • gillenator
    replied
    Originally posted by Follicle Death Row
    Dr. Cooley is now dipping follicles in Acell as part of the standard FUT.

    This patient has type IVA hair loss and was started on finasteride. We performed 3,760 FU grafts (1-935, 2-1,827, 3-758, 4-240) totalling 7,823 hairs. His hair is extremely fine which has the benefit of looking very natural when transplanted but requires more grafts to look full. ACell was used on the grafts, which we find


    I had wondered if doing so might increase the likelihood of the transplanted grafts taking straight away and not going into the usual shed and hibernation period. Dr. Cooley informed me that unfortunately this is not the case and that the rare occurence of the hair not shedding after HT is the same as before.

    Thought this might be useful information for the thread.
    FDR, good info to know. A few additional thoughts. My premonition is that Acell will increase overall yield which IMHO, is very important. And since we all have limited donor reserves, every effort to promote "graft survival" by minimizing the effects of ischemia reperfusion is worthwhile to the patient. Free radicals are not good for grafts once they leave their natural environment.

    I am also interested in observing any long term positive effects in minimizing shockloss as well. In other words, "Can Acell also help reduce the level of trauma in the surrounding tissue in the recipient area?"

    What do you guys think?

    Leave a comment:


  • Follicle Death Row
    replied
    Dr. Cooley is now dipping follicles in Acell as part of the standard FUT.

    This patient has type IVA hair loss and was started on finasteride. We performed 3,760 FU grafts (1-935, 2-1,827, 3-758, 4-240) totalling 7,823 hairs. His hair is extremely fine which has the benefit of looking very natural when transplanted but requires more grafts to look full. ACell was used on the grafts, which we find


    I had wondered if doing so might increase the likelihood of the transplanted grafts taking straight away and not going into the usual shed and hibernation period. Dr. Cooley informed me that unfortunately this is not the case and that the rare occurence of the hair not shedding after HT is the same as before.

    Thought this might be useful information for the thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • gillenator
    replied
    They simply support what I do as an independent hairloss advocate in helping patients world-wide resolve their hairloss dilemmas. In other words, they endorse me but I am not employed by any of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairTalk
    replied
    Originally posted by gillenator
    To date, Dr. Cooley undoubtedly is still observing and documenting the trial periods, meaning, it first takes many patients to participate in these trials in order to obtain enough clinical results from these substances to substantiate his findings and conclusions. There will be more to come when he is ready to publish all in proper timing.

    In simple terms, these things take time.
    Just curious about your signature, Gillenator: what is your association with the mentioned doctors (i.e., Drs. Charles, Cooley, Harris, True, and Dorin)?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dutch_Dude
    replied
    Originally posted by UK_
    What bad results? You got a link?
    Type in Dr. Hitzig and then you get to his clinic...most of the results are not very impressive if you compare them to others...

    Leave a comment:


  • gillenator
    replied
    Originally posted by HairTalk
    Thanks for posting this video, UK_.

    It seems we've not heard from Dr. Cooley, in some while, on this topic. I'd be interested to read how is experiments with ACell are coming along.
    To date, Dr. Cooley undoubtedly is still observing and documenting the trial periods, meaning, it first takes many patients to participate in these trials in order to obtain enough clinical results from these substances to substantiate his findings and conclusions. There will be more to come when he is ready to publish all in proper timing.

    In simple terms, these things take time.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    Originally posted by Dutch_Dude
    then it's impressive...so basically he regenerated hair by injecting stuff into his crown. nice.

    what i'm more concerned about is the bad results that hitzig shows on his website...
    What bad results? You got a link?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dutch_Dude
    replied
    then it's impressive...so basically he regenerated hair by injecting stuff into his crown. nice.

    what i'm more concerned about is the bad results that hitzig shows on his website...

    Leave a comment:


  • mkamph
    replied
    the crown.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dutch_Dude
    replied
    Originally posted by mkamph
    the front is after a transplant, but the back is just the injection of acell/prp i believe.
    the back as in the crown, or the donor?

    Leave a comment:


  • mkamph
    replied
    the front is after a transplant, but the back is just the injection of acell/prp i believe.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardDawkins
    replied
    Hope you guys know that this is after a transplant

    Leave a comment:


  • crowningglory
    replied
    Interesting!! Fingers crossed that this effect is permanent. I'd love to see the long-term data (obviously) - as with other such treatments/procedure the disappointments only come in the long run...

    Leave a comment:


  • t-bone
    replied
    Congratulations! Looks amazing! The acell helped me as well!

    Leave a comment:

Working...