Topical fin can be effective, and you have to ask merck why that it is. All the other stuff like amount systemic and that who really knows. The internal pill is certainly a heck of a lot easier to use which is why merck did that instead. Little did they know the amount of complaining about sides that would show up in hair loss forums 20 years later
Sandman: I don’t get where you are concluding topical fin. is a waste of time.
When Merck was developing and researching the uses for fin. as it relates to hairloss, they found it was effective as a topical.
They chose the pill route because they felt, in the long run, it would be more convienient for users.
- See more at: http://www.regrowth.com/hair-loss-fo....sT35EloU.dpuf
Sandman: I don’t get where you are concluding topical fin. is a waste of time.
When Merck was developing and researching the uses for fin. as it relates to hairloss, they found it was effective as a topical.
They chose the pill route because they felt, in the long run, it would be more convienient for users.
- See more at: http://www.regrowth.com/hair-loss-fo....sT35EloU.dpuf
Comment