3rd Procedure with Gho

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by didi
    hair on the right looks same diameter as donor and you have all sort of different grafts there which shows your donor and recipient mirror each other, its not scientific but its good to see
    What would the donor and recipient look like, when gc's photos would be scientific? Can you please describe it a little bit what it would look like?

    Originally posted by didi
    can you mark 1 cm2 on your recipient area where you had hst 9 months ago so we can count how many hairs are growing, should be around 35 FUs

    once we know that - we can mark and observe 1 cm2 in your donor and and compare it
    Yeah? - so that "we" can see what exactly in each pic?

    Can you please explain the logic behind your ideas, so that at least you're able to understand yourself the benefit of your proposals?

    Leave a comment:


  • didi
    replied
    hair on the right looks same diameter as donor and you have all sort of different grafts there which shows your donor and recipient mirror each other, its not scientific but its good to see


    can you mark 1 cm2 on your recipient area where you had hst 9 months ago so we can count how many hairs are growing, should be around 35 FUs


    once we know that we can mark and observe 1 cm2 in your donor and and compare it

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    ... you will always have every option!



    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Yes, but this is a minimum distance. They could space out the HSI grafts the same distance as the HST grafts if you prefer it like that.
    Come on gc, with Gho's technique ...

    ... you will always have every option!
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    All the hairs/grafts on the right side, are all the new hairs/grafts from your 2nd procedure 9 month ago.
    Besides many other interesting things - one thing is simply obvious:
    Just 9 month after, the implanted (CLONED!) hairs have exactly the same characteristics as the hairs/grafts in your donor area. That's simply a fact. Hairs, in a former completely slick bald area.
    Yea I thought the same, but good to hear it from someone else!

    I hope people can also see the grafts are not thinner (diameter per hair) than the 'normal hair' which they reside next to. This was mentioned a few times over the last year or so which just isn't true, at least in my case anyway!

    I might sound biased, but I think its incredible, especially when only 18 months ago I was looking at a scalp reduction which was suggested by one clinic.

    IM, did any of of those other grafts regenerate, I think it was 6 or 7 right that hadn't originally?

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by clarence
    Oh... but that'll be consuming twice as many grafts compared to the HST... unless you're lucky enough to have a 100% regeneration rate.
    Yes, but this is a minimum distance. They could space out the HSI grafts the same distance as the HST grafts if you prefer it like that.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied

    All the hairs/grafts on the right side, are all the new hairs/grafts from your 2nd procedure 9 month ago.
    Besides many other interesting things - one thing is simply obvious:
    Just 9 month after, the implanted (CLONED!) hairs have exactly the same characteristics as the hairs/grafts in your donor area. That's simply a fact. Hairs, in a former completely slick bald area.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Directly from Hasci site:
    Higher density: now the hair stem cells can be implanted even more closely together. With HST, the implantation spacing is 0,2-0,3 mm, while with injection the spacing is 0,1 mm.
    Oh... but that'll be consuming twice as many grafts compared to the HST... unless you're lucky enough to have a 100% regeneration rate.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Pics after day 1 - 822 grafts in the frontal area directly behind the forelock area:









    I haven't taken any pics of the 2nd lot yet, but I'll prob take them tomorrow.

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Maybe you too had some "fights" with "cats" in the past?

    http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showpos...4&postcount=29
    Correct everyone has them right! But I'm on about the more serious ones - I wish I was born 15 years later so I could have known about Gho earlier and I wouldn't have been sliced like that. I'll show those another time if anyone is curious.

    Here are a couple of pics of the recipient area on the morning after being shaved, not great quality pics, but doesn't matter with these:
    http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/9/28/3202143/14th%20Jan%202013%20014.JPG

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    Ha, well observed. I had totally forgot about the birthmark. I also under estimated the scars I have on the back of my head, but that's really last on my agenda of fixes.
    Maybe you too had some "fights" with "cats" in the past?

    Below a 33-year-old AGA patient (its, of course, NOT damielmillo!!): 10 years before, the guy had a full head of hair and, of course, not such severe thinning in his donor area Transplanting such a guy in his 20s, would have given him only a temporary benefit in the (balding) recipient area. damielmillos

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    I know more than you about your head ...
    Ha, well observed. I had totally forgot about the birthmark. I also under estimated the scars I have on the back of my head, but that's really last on my agenda of fixes.

    Just one more from the monitored area, which I taken whilst in Gho's and it came out better than I expected, surprising what a crap camera can do:

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk

    Another pic slightly different angle, but less flashback http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/9/...2013%20054.JPG

    Another one, it's probably too far to the right:
    http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/9/...2013%20057.JPG
    Wow - ALL pics are great!
    The reason for more pics: - with more pics it's easier to determine the characteristics of all 53 extractions sites (1-hair or 2-hair FU etc) after 9 month, hairy man.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by gc83uk
    I will upload 2 or 3 more of either the same or near same angle in a moment, perhaps they won't have the flash in the area your looking at.
    The area is above your birthmark, as shown in the pics below ...

    I know more than you about your head ...
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • gc83uk
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Good work, gc!

    Not sure whether I should be surprised or not - it took me around 10 sec to find the area just through "looking" (the angle is similar to the day 6 photo). The flash is a little bit disturbing - but you can see EVERYTHING. This photo could be completely enough for a nice comparison.

    Maybe you find 2-3 other good photos from this area?

    By the way - how do feel today?
    I will upload 2 or 3 more of either the same or near same angle in a moment, perhaps they won't have the flash in the area your looking at.

    If they are of no use, then I will delete them to save on bandwidth of this particular fileden account, just let me know!

    And yeah I honestly feel fantastic, thanks for asking!

    I can't stop smiling since I've had it done and shaving my head is a huge weight off my shoulders!

    Another pic slightly different angle, but less flashback http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/9/28/3202143/14th%20Jan%202013%20054.JPG

    Another one, it's probably too far to the right:

    Leave a comment:

Working...