So why did you assume that he is not using concealers in the pic? Most people who use concealers use them everywhere not just on TV set..... People use conceleaers so people around them think that they have good hair.... not just the ones watching TV.
if you ask HASCI for another procedure to thicken your first HST they will recommend against it and tell you clearly that it will not make much difference and you should use your grafts on other areas or preserve them for future bald spots.
-
Yeah, that's why I put it on the Gaz 5HST thread!
Because I think that if G Joling had had 5 HST instead of 2 FUT and 3 HST, his result would be even better (don't forget they spent a lot of grafts in covering his FUT scars, he could have used them for the top).
What I mean is that for whoever is really pissed with his NW situation, there is a way to keep some decent situation and a kind of normal life!
Expensive tough... but hair transplant his the most unfairly priced surgery.Leave a comment:
-
hmm. ok, he had 2 FUTs and 3 HSTs.
yes, he looks ok now.
but that doesn't mean that HST is the cure or that normal FUE procedures wouldn't do the same. the FUTs gave him already a good amount of grafts, too.
summary: do 5 hair transplants and let your scalp be destroyed by FUT scars, then you can be a solid NW2.5 with a bit luck.Leave a comment:
-
Do your own research, you have the name, you have Google and Youtube!
Yes, the dude made an FUT in the 90's when already balding so I assume that he would have turned NW 6 without interventions, check his HST video in Youtube, you see the situation.
He looks OK now, doesn't he?Leave a comment:
-
-
Gerard Joling, supposed to be a NW6 in his 50's something
Instead, he got 3 HST and he is a pretty decent NW2,5 and here it is a pic in the sun, full light on holiday in the tropics, don't tell me about concealer etc... he is not on a TV set
Leave a comment:
-
Even with a good traditional hair transplant where the hairs are placed at the right angles to match existing hairs, hair never seems to lay flat as it exits the scalp like natural non transplanted hair does at inbetween lengthsLeave a comment:
-
Even if there was no regeneration i agree that HST is the best in term of donor area......... But is it the best in term of recipient area ?
The main things about recipient area is the angle of the transplanted hair and the density which i think hasci lack in both departments.
I had my HST and im happy and satisfied with the donor area as it still looks virgin even when i shave down to 0. However, im not that satisfied with the recipient area as the hair grow in different angles sticking up instead of laying flat or following my existing hair angles which makes it look unnatural unless i shave it very short or grow it very long to hide or control the direction of the hair, but anything in between looks a bit unnatural.Leave a comment:
-
that's always soooooooooooo welcome (since there is no better option so far).
Gaz result is also important, it could be eloquent... so if Gaz reads me, Cheers and share :-)
If I go at the end of this year which I am 75% of deciding, I will try to document.Leave a comment:
-
Caddarik need not speculate much longer. I bet there's ten thousand forum posts of dispute around this matter. All just because nobody succeeded in producing the "before" photos, which I'm about to show you. Hang on, I'll see where I can upload some of them at full resolution. They're, like, 16bit / 18 megapixelsLeave a comment:
-
Hey Gaz,
any opportunity to shoot your result post HST 5 and post it here so that we can be jealous of you?
Cheers mate,Leave a comment:
-
who is wrong, who is right?
I still believe that spending time on television defending their technique and keeping on repeating that they are working on improving it to the point of creating more than one hair from one hair is a bit suicidal if they are fraud!
the scandal behind it even if not yet there, is huge!
They always make the difference with FUE, saying tht they are the only one to multiply hair.
I know we had that debate already, and am not denying the fishy or blurry zones...
Still, I trust it's the best option so far and I trust there might come a day where the cure "multiplying hair and reimplanting them" might come from them in the end... from the so criticized Dr Gho.
They said it in the last episode, one procedure gives 35% coverage, two give 70% (and to be honest, I have the impression they are not bullshitting, I am sure I would have a very decent 70% coverage with a second procedure on my front)
Look at Guido : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mnjy0FtZ2jg
starts around 11:00
For who can afford it, isn't it the best? I and you probably would have a Guido situation with another one or two procedures max!!! and then, relax for another 5, 6 years and see what Gho says about 1hair becoming 5.Leave a comment:
-
Who would sue them ? First of all it's almost impossible for the average consumer to find out if it worked. How would you do that ? Secondly, IF you found out it didnt work (like I did but also like Ben Saunders did for example), would you sue them ? Hell no. A lawsuit is a horrible thing. I've sued somebody before (who stole money from me, about $100.000), it's tons of stress, high lawyer fees and in the end what will you get ? It's really not worth it for such a relatively low amount of money.
The only option was the central organisation for marketing in the Netherlands, the "Reclame code commissie". A group of Dutch doctors and hair specialists went to them 2 times to have HASCI stop advertising but the Reclame Code Commissie ruled in favor of HASCI twice (purely based on the argument that they had something published in a scientific magazine, EVEN though the magazine admitted they never checkec HASCI's article, quite unbelievable IMHO). The organisation in general only rules 2 times, after that you can't go to them again to ask for a ruling. Two times is the max. So what other option do people have ? Nothing. And that's why HASCI still continues doing business.Leave a comment:
-
and as mentioned earlier in this thread about Gaz results, let's please stop the neverending discussion about "true or not"... we have 27.495 posts of arguments and fights about that...
It is OK, I'm fine with both claims... the most important to me is "how to deal with hair loss and best options to bridge until the cure if any".
If you were so sure about him being a cheater, you would move on and disregard threads mentioning his name.
I give it the benefit of the doubts, there are fishy moves from them and also to much certitudes in you with no effects since they are still growing and developping (and trust me, they have a fair database of clients, you could have found allies to go to court if they were soooo bad and so much cheating).
So, keep your certitudes for the threads where we argued about it, here it's a thread about Gaz results, hopefully, our friend will soon show us some pics post HST 5.
I would never try to shut HASCI down, because, what if they bring the 1 hair = 5? or what if they really have it in the pipeline?
IF they were so fake and not legit, they would have closed their door, drawning in a sea of complaints and lawsuits...Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: