It 's over. Dr. Mwamba confirmed Nigam!

[Arashi]

I think he needs to get some patients to get a real proof. I think he's reputable and he has his personal reasons to feel so confident. Let's wait for an update of his in the next weeks

If this guy is honest and has good intentions, then it's wonderful news. But when I read the post his partner posted ... Man this really does feel bad. Promising all kinds of stuff without any evidence, where did we see that before ?

[tmw]

Sure but without proof, who's going to visit him ?

I think he needs to get some patients to get a real proof. I think he's reputable and he has his personal reasons to feel so confident. Let's wait for an update of his in the next weeks

[Arashi]

even with 60% regen Mwamba will be King of Europe. watchout everyone

Sure but without proof, who's going to visit him ?

[didi]

even with 60% regen Mwamba will be King of Europe. watchout everyone

[Arashi]

they explained the stuff seems promising and makes sense, so they will try.
Atm no promises about working for sure or not. This is what I read
I'm still very interested though

It's interesting but it also gets very discouraging. Dr Nigams made it sound like Mwamba would come in and verify his therapy. He didn't. I had hoped he would perform some experiments and tell us in 6 months how they worked out. Well, maybe he did that, but then why post stuff like that 60% (and later remove it) !?!? This Mwamba guy seems to be just like Nigams.

Anyway, let's forget about this. The real proof is in converting a NW7 to a NW1. Dr Nigams promised us he's going to start with 5 NW7's which he's going to turn into NW1's next monday. Let's focus on that, cause that only that could finally yield the proof we all seek.

[tmw]

Well, my point is, this is a serious hit on Mwamba's credibility. He was supposed to be a trustworthy guy and now he's just speculating and promising stuff, just like Nigams always does !?!?!?! Where's the proof ?

they explained the stuff seems promising and makes sense, so they will try.
Atm no promises about working for sure or not. This is what I read
I'm still very interested though

[Arashi]

Maybe it was just a supposition,don't know exactly man

Well, my point is, this is a serious hit on Mwamba's credibility. He was supposed to be a trustworthy guy and now he's just speculating and promising stuff, just like Nigams always does !?!?!?! Where's the proof ?

[tmw]

Ok, thanks for clearing that up. But even then, how can they even know they can achieve 60% ?? They can't. In 2 weeks time it's impossible to perform any experiments and see results. All they could do it talk to Nigams.

Maybe it was just a supposition,don't know exactly man

[Arashi]

sorry, what I wanted to say is that his consulent removed that % because this 60 could be a pessimistic number and it's better not to give precise % at the moment, as this treatment still needs to be experimented

Ok, thanks for clearing that up. But even then, how can they even know they can achieve at least 60% ?? They can't. In 2 weeks time it's impossible to perform any experiments and see results. All they could do it talk to Nigams.

[tmw]

Sorry, not trying to disrespect, but when you wrote:

"well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;"

How are we supposed to understand what that means ? A negative %, so that's donor loss instead of regrowth ?

sorry, what I wanted to say is that his consulent removed that % because this 60 could be a pessimistic number and it's better not to give precise % at the moment, as this treatment still needs to be experimented

[DesperateOne]

2 weeks? Well this just keeps getting better and better.

[Arashi]

Well I think my English is pretty good indeed and it's clear you don't want to understand. I'm just helpin you all to get the best translation possible.
Don't care what he did/removed, Im just telling you the facts

Sorry, not trying to disrespect, but when you wrote:

"well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;"

How are we supposed to understand what that means ? A negative %, so that's donor loss instead of regrowth ?

[tmw]

I think your English is a bit problematic here. What exactly happened ? His consultent went rogue, posted a number and then dr Mwamba called him back ? This seems like Nigams practices ...

Well I think my English is pretty good indeed and it's clear you don't want to understand. I'm just helpin you all to get the best translation possible.
Don't care what he did/removed, Im just telling you the facts

[Arashi]

No man I'm telling you for the third time he modified that message and remove any %, he said to avoid misunderstandings.

And again, No one said it works for sure, the consulent just said he will start to perform it soon but he feels confident.

I think your English is a bit problematic here. What exactly happened ? His consultent went rogue, posted a number and then dr Mwamba called him back ? This seems like Nigams practices ...

[tmw]

This is supposedly what he said: I can achieve in the future re-growth of at least 60% of the donor used

No man I'm telling you for the third time he modified that message and remove any %, he said to avoid misunderstandings.

And again, No one said it works for sure, the consulent just said he will start to perform it soon but he feels confident.