gc83uk's september '13 procedure.

[cocacola]

Hey GC, congrats on your 4th hst. Hope you will be happy with the result.

Didnt take the time to read the whole 10 pages of spam since u had it, but i was just wondering do u have pics of ur donor before each procedure? I think it will be the best way to asses if there is regen or not.

I mean if after 4 hst ur donor looks pretty much the same even if thinned a little, its no big deal.

[Arashi]

The 520 grafts done today out of 720 extractions

65% * 720 -200 failed extractions = 268 grafts regen fully (or equivalent of)

So out of 520 we started with, 268 have regenerated, basically 50%.

OK I hear you about the recipient thing too, so you could lower thant because of the 1.5 hairs per FU in the recipient, so instead of (520 * 2 hair FU's) with 1.5 hairs per FU, it will be the equivalent of 390 (2 hair FUs)

520-390 = 130 FU's equivalent lost in the recipient by not having 2 hair FU's.

268-130 = 138 FU equivalent regen

So out of 520 to start with you're getting the equivalent of 138 FU net gain. 26%

That make more sense?

Of course the lower the amount of failed extractions, the closer the number is going to be to that 65%. On your yesterday's procedure, 2300 extraction holes and only 1300 grafts. On today's you say you have 720 extraction holes for 500 grafts, that's a much better number. I'll go and verify that number for you, but not today, maybe this weekend ok ?

[gc83uk]

Oops, seems I'm wrong ...

My all-time favourite post.

[gc83uk]

Oops, seems I'm wrong ...

I have at least found THE real reason, why you already had 4 HSTs in Dr. Gho's London clinic at all:


Originally Posted by gc83uk View Post

I'm back in the hotel now, I finally met Deborah today, lovely girl.

lol, you're the one why likes to bury his head between the techs legs, remember that post?

[gc83uk]

hmmm, I will try to tell you, what definitely doesn't make sense:

Someone who already had 4 HST procedures and still as no clue about anything.

Am I wrong?

I have nothing to lose. I've simply chosen the best procedure available today. Is that wrong also?

[534623]

hmmm, I will try to tell you, what definitely doesn't make sense:

Someone who already had 4 HST procedures and still as no clue about anything.

Am I wrong?

Oops, seems I'm wrong ...

I have at least found THE real reason, why you already had 4 HSTs in Dr. Gho's London clinic at all:

I'm back in the hotel now, I finally met Deborah today, lovely girl.

[534623]

That make more sense?

hmmm, I will try to tell you, what definitely doesn't make sense:

Someone who already had 4 HST procedures and still as no clue about anything.

Am I wrong?

[gc83uk]

Can you explain what number is what ? I don't see what you're doing here.

Anyway, off to the gym, be back in a bit to look at your example.

The 520 grafts done today out of 720 extractions

65% * 720 -200 failed extractions = 268 grafts regen fully (or equivalent of)

So out of 520 we started with, 268 have regenerated, basically 50%.

OK I hear you about the recipient thing too, so you could lower thant because of the 1.5 hairs per FU in the recipient, so instead of (520 * 2 hair FU's) with 1.5 hairs per FU, it will be the equivalent of 390 (2 hair FUs)

520-390 = 130 FU's equivalent lost in the recipient by not having 2 hair FU's.

268-130 = 138 FU equivalent regen

So out of 520 to start with you're getting the equivalent of 138 FU net gain. 26%

That make more sense?

[Arashi]

Would dr mwamba put his reputation online, rmbr he is a member of spencers alliance, spence will drill him, you know what I mean....

I don't know. But what I do know that it's impossible to conclude anything in 2 weeks. Yet his people went on the boards and already claimed > 60% regeneration. Not sure what to make of it, but it makes him look really bad.

[didi]

Would dr mwamba put his reputation online, rmbr he is a member of spencers alliance, spence will drill him, you know what I mean....


you cant convince him unless you got goodies...




will see, but anyway, it will be huge disappointment if it fails....


only pilofocus and mwamba left ....fingers crossed

[Arashi]

"Anyway, Didi, you were right all along"

Arashi



Thank you....but I was hoping it would come from IM...

He's delusional. He lives in his own imaginary world. It's sad. That's why Im not even bashing him with all of his failures. Just forget about him.

[didi]

"Anyway, Didi, you were right all along"

Arashi



Thank you....but I was hoping it would come from IM...

[Arashi]

now you see why hasci sabotaged 2 tests....smart but not smart enough to trick me

Really, everything falls into place now. Why they advise only max 3 HST's, why none of the celebs went more than 3 times, why they messed up the 50 graft test twice, why they can't show us a NW7 -> NW1 conversion, why they fail to cooperate everytime etc etc etc...

lets hope nigam/mwamba venture don't end
up like gho

NIgams in my opinion is nothing but a fraud. After the zillion of photoshopped pictures I'm not taking that guy seriously. And Mwamba seems to be a following in his footstep. He's concluding that everything is ok after visiting Nigams for just 2 weeks. That's a joke. And you know it too, Didi.

[didi]

now you see why hasci sabotaged 2 tests....smart move but not smart enough to trick me


lets hope nigam/mwamba venture don't end up like gho

[Arashi]

True, but this is worst case scenario. It's easy to twist the figures up again. E.g 520 out of 720 (0.65 * 720) -200 = 268 grafts out of 520, basically 50%, ok you could lower than because of the 1.5 hairs per FU in the recipient, so instead of (520 * 2) 1040 hairs in the recip, you'll get about 780 hairs, so the equivalent of 390 (2 hair FUs)

520-390 = 130

268-130 = 138

So out of 520 to start with you're getting the equivalent of 138 FU net gain. 26% and that's only using JJJJrS 65% figure which I would question for serveral reasons (including when I photographed the same area a few months later and see different numbers of hairs per FU to what he recorded).

Can you explain what number is what ? I don't see what you're doing here.

Anyway, off to the gym, be back in a bit to look at your example.