With HST, why can't you cover the whole head?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 534623
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 1854

    #46
    Originally posted by JJJJrS

    Someone like Dean Saunders, for example, with all the money and time, will still have an unnatural hairline that is far too high to frame his face after 5k grafts!
    Wow - another idiot who can see in advance DS 5k grafts result. Yes, I'm talking about the singer Dean Saunders, who just recently got his 3rd HST procedure. And as an additional wow, they even know everything about his future intentions or his motives in general!!

    Comment

    • JJJJrS
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 638

      #47
      Originally posted by 534623
      Wow - another idiot who can see in advance DS 5k grafts result. Yes, I'm talking about the singer Dean Saunders, who just recently got his 3rd HST procedure. And as an additional wow, they even know everything about his future intentions or his motives in general!!
      Look at the pictures from the 3rd procedure. They didn't touch the hairline. Everyting was in the midscalp and crown. Does HST magically grow hair where none was implanted also?

      Comment

      • JJJJrS
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2012
        • 638

        #48
        Iron_Man, you jumped on Histogen for their bullshit photos, and you had every right to. But you know very well that the real regeneration rate for HST is not even close to 80% for the average patient, even though HASCI guarantees it in their contract. Why are you silent about that? Don't you think that's very deceptive?

        Comment

        • Arashi
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 3888

          #49
          You know, this whole thread, this whole discussion, this whole yes/no game ... This is EXACTLY why we HASCI finally needs to prove their technique and show us the results of the 50 graft test. It's a shame that after 5 weeks they still haven't even produced 1 single good pre-op photo.

          Comment

          • didi
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2011
            • 1360

            #50
            Originally posted by Arashi
            You know, this whole thread, this whole discussion, this whole yes/no game ... This is EXACTLY why we HASCI finally needs to prove their technique and show us the results of the 50 graft test. It's a shame that after 5 weeks they still haven't even produced 1 single good pre-op photo.


            dean saunders still looks like a bald man, ultra high hairline screams hair transplant!! really bad one. now he looks unutural , people who who see him for the first time would know he had something done

            people underestimate importance of hairline something dr feriduni understands the best, its supposed to frame your face but in DSs case it does not. His first 2 procedures 3500 grafts should have made bigger impact on his look.


            can we get Spencer to help us with this since HASCI is not cooperative and is using every trick possible confuse things and as result we have desperate patients forking out their life savings for something that is misrepresented. Spencer Kobren as consumer advocate its time to step in, people are getting sick of you beating around the bush,
            its certain 80% regeneration is not true and proving gho wrong would have serious repercussions on his company, all these 6 000 hst patients would go back and ask for money back or free grafts..
            enough to send them bankrupt

            hasci is between hard and rock and no wonder they are happy with status quo and keeping low profile.

            snakeoil salesman

            Comment

            • ccmethinning
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2012
              • 317

              #51
              Originally posted by didi
              its certain 80% regeneration is not true
              I have not been around these forums much in recent months. When did this become confirmed?

              Comment

              • 534623
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2011
                • 1854

                #52
                Originally posted by ccmethinning
                I have not been around these forums much in recent months. When did this become confirmed?
                Since "its certain" ....lol

                Comment

                • Skywalker
                  Member
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 63

                  #53
                  Originally posted by ccmethinning
                  I have not been around these forums much in recent months. When did this become confirmed?
                  Basically it didn't, it's an opinion - we're not really sure about the detail regarding the quality of recipient growth rates and whether some follicles in the donor are thinner in the donor area after regrowth and to what extent etc.

                  You have to take into account who is "confirming" this

                  Comment

                  Working...