I think that would be the best solution and the one I had in mind also.
The other key thing is how HASCI decides to preform the procedure. I'm sure they already know what it takes to properly document it but hopefully they follow the steps we've asked for:
Like hellouser said, HASCI's response to this has been fantastic so I don't think we should push our luck at this point.
It'll be worth it.
Something like this can only benefit the hair loss community. It's about time we stopped debating the procedure anyway.
The other key thing is how HASCI decides to preform the procedure. I'm sure they already know what it takes to properly document it but hopefully they follow the steps we've asked for:
- 50 grafts (including 1-hair, 2-hair, and 3-hair follicular units) are extracted from a small area (~2 cm^2).
- These 50 grafts are then implanted into a slick bald area, approx. 1.5 cm^2 in size
While it is not necessary to mark these two areas with a non-permanent tattoo, high quality, zoomed-in photographs of these two areas must be taken both before and after the procedure.
- These 50 grafts are then implanted into a slick bald area, approx. 1.5 cm^2 in size
While it is not necessary to mark these two areas with a non-permanent tattoo, high quality, zoomed-in photographs of these two areas must be taken both before and after the procedure.
It'll be worth it.

Comment