Histogen at the ISHRS conference

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FearTheLoss
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Hard? Not at all. How many points do you need?
    Are there other scientists who support Histogen's claims?
    Ironman...go eat a bowl of dicks

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser

    Hard to turn down Histogen at that point.
    Hard? Not at all. How many points do you need?
    Are there other scientists who support Histogen's claims?

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by FearTheLoss
    In their last trail they stated that it for sure works on the temples.
    They also provided photographs as well, there was a HUGE response on the hairlosshelp forums praising Histogen for their achievements. I don't remember the density of the temple regrowth... this was also a while back so they could have only made greater progress since. Hard to turn down Histogen at that point.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kiwi
    replied
    Originally posted by FearTheLoss
    In their last trail they stated that it for sure works on the temples.
    Ignore ironman - he can't remove his nose from Gho's anus. All he does is diss EVERYThING else.

    Leave a comment:


  • FearTheLoss
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Sure. Histogen says HSC can even grow brand new hairs in scar tissue...



    ...so why not on the temples/hairline, where there is no scar tissue?
    I mean, perhaps it doesn't work for you, perhaps not for me and perhaps for nobody, but it has at least the potential to work for somebody or something - like Propecia or TRX-2.
    In their last trail they stated that it for sure works on the temples.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by dex89

    is this proven to work on the temples/hairline?
    Sure. Histogen says HSC can even grow brand new hairs in scar tissue...



    ...so why not on the temples/hairline, where there is no scar tissue?
    I mean, perhaps it doesn't work for you, perhaps not for me and perhaps for nobody, but it has at least the potential to work for somebody or something - like Propecia or TRX-2.

    Leave a comment:


  • LMS
    replied
    Originally posted by rdawg
    not coming, they'll give us more by around march/april final IIa results.
    wait so histogen is on phase 2a? inb4 there start phase 2b to iron out some kinks.

    forever waiting.

    goodnight sweet hairs.

    goodnight aesthetics

    Leave a comment:


  • rdawg
    replied
    Originally posted by koolx
    btw, WHERE ARE THE FUC"KIN PICS!!!!!!!!!
    not coming, they'll give us more by around march/april final IIa results.

    Leave a comment:


  • Thinning87
    replied
    Ok so all this fuzz for this post above? Your speculations and deductions don't affect those of us who have decided to remain cautiously optimistic. We'll see what happens with Histogen, few of us expected the ultimate cure, most of us were hoping for some better version of Rogaine to hang on to our hair for a few years, hopefully with less Finasteride.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by UK Boy

    - he says it's the combination of injuring and a compound. But why are you bringing this up? That was Follica's approach - Follica's dead!
    Thanks - I just wanted to hear this from another user. Okay, now back to my questions:
    Originally posted by 534623
    Can someone do me a favor, please?



    starting at 02:00>>what exactly is Dr. Cotsarelis saying in this video?

    He is talking about a "combination". Combination of WHAT exactly created the hairs on the mouse's back - and what's the reason why you shouldn't try this at home?

    And finally, 1) what has this to do with Histogen, 2) Histogen's presentation at the ISHRS meeting and finally, 3) Dr. Cole's report? I will tell you this thereafter...
    1) Histogen is BASED ON everything what Dr. Cotsarelis is talking about in this (posted) video. That's simply a fact, and Histogen mention this in their papers, presentations etc.
    1a) Histogen just produces the mentioned "compound" (HSC=hair stimulating complex) in their labs, which can improve such results as Dr. Cotsarelis got them in his mouse-study with a similar COMPOUND (Wnt's based etc) - in addition to WOUNDING (=full thickness wound) of the skin.

    2/3) This threads TOPIC:
    Dr. Cole reported in a video, that she, Dr. Gail Naughton, mentioned at the meeting something like "HSC can even grow hair in 'scar tissue'!" and Dr. Cole said something like (not 1:1 transcript!) "If this stuff works so great even in scar tissue - why there is the need to show us pics with lots of hairs in the BEFORE photos??" - or something - right?
    Anyway, I think this has been a misunderstanding at the meeting, and Dr. Naughton meant actually "This stuff could produce/helped growth of hairs even in WOUNDS" - and thought about their own mouse-studies and Dr. Cotsarelis findings. Period. There is simply a difference between freshly created full thickness WOUNDS and old SCAR TISSUE.

    And now the easy to understand point:
    Without FULL THICKNESS WOUNDING, und just injecting such stuff into the skin, this works just like injection of water or cat piss into the skin - USELESS for creating brand new mini-organs like hair follicles or "rejuvenation" of existing hair follicle structures, simply because this "window", as mentioned by Dr. Cotsarelis in his study, doesn't happen/exist with just injectioning such stuff. This is well known among research-scientists. This "window" just happens in the event of "full thickness wounding" and works better or not at all "species-related" - among lots of other different conditions. In simple words - Histogen's HSC, is just based on "hot air" and that's THE reason why they can't show you any LEGIT photos since so many years.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK Boy
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Why should I explain something when guys are not even able to post THE 2 words from the video?
    This is what's winding me up with your posts Ironman - why're you doing this whole thing with making people 'tell you stuff'? You wanna make some comment just make it already! But just to stop this stupidness - he says it's the combination of injuring and a compound. But why are you bringing this up? That was Follica's approach - Follica's dead! Are you saying that Histogen needs to injure the scalp and then apply HSC?

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Thinning87
    Ok i'm gonna pass out if you wanna let us know the key to this mystery please write it down and I will read it tomorrow morning.

    Good night folks!
    Why should I explain something when guys are not even able to post THE 2 words from the video?

    Leave a comment:


  • koolx
    replied
    Originally posted by Desmond84
    @2020
    Garethbale asked me about Aderans (in Histogen thread) so I said 2015! Histogen will most definitely NOT be available in US by 2015!
    again according to the spencer interview in november 2012 histogen will be released in the us by 2017.

    Leave a comment:


  • Desmond84
    replied
    Hey guys,

    Does anyone have the link to this weeks show? Apparently Joe was discussing what's been happening on the forum!

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • Thinning87
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    Right - but why?
    What exactly is needed to get this to work? What exactly do they say?
    Ok i'm gonna pass out if you wanna let us know the key to this mystery please write it down and I will read it tomorrow morning.

    Good night folks!

    Leave a comment:

Working...