New Stemcell Treatment Photos... wow?

[VictimOfDHT]

well ok, but this last photo isnt shopped. no friggin' way!
I'm experienced with photoshop and I'd notice that.

i wouldnt say its a concealer either, little particles of it would be visible. Is it fue? really can't tell... he said patient did fue (probably very recently) and fue would be visible even 4-5 months after operation (small redish dots on recipient area...)

I cant say for sure about fue but it ISNT concealer or 'shop.

Bananana, if I were you I wouldn't go banana over this. I'll remind you soon - IT'S ALL BULLSH*T. So the guy is somehow able to turn 5000 hairs to 30,000? Of course only he has this magic power to do this and at the same time keep it a secret so you know, not too many bald guys would rush to him and pay him millions of $$$ to get their hair back, because you know, who would want all that money and fame?

Like I said, anyone who knows any better wouldn't give this bastard a second look.

BTW, in a local mall here, there's one chinese herbal store that has a similar pic (before and after) of a guy taking some herbal sh*t and "regrowing" his hair. They put that pic on a board around 2ft X 2ft right in front of the store so people passing by can see it. You know, maybe the second pic here is the one I saw on their board but I'm not sure. Either way, I know better than to believe either one, or anyone else who claims to have some magical treatment for hair loss.

[bananana]

Probably . A couple of bucks there can still get things done especially if someone has no job.

well ok, but this last photo isnt shopped. no friggin' way!
I'm experienced with photoshop and I'd notice that.

i wouldnt say its a concealer either, little particles of it would be visible. Is it fue? really can't tell... he said patient did fue (probably very recently) and fue would be visible even 4-5 months after operation (small redish dots on recipient area...)

I cant say for sure about fue but it ISNT concealer or 'shop.

[VictimOfDHT]

Judging on the quality of some of the photoshops he must have payed a lot less then that

Probably . A couple of bucks there can still get things done especially if someone has no job.

[JJJJrS]

Pics DON'T prove jack sh*t, at least in this case. You know you can make a bald guy have a full head of hair with something called "computer". You're like my brother, he sees a pic of a bald guy in an ad, then the same guy with hair after some magical treatment and he believes it. If this bastard is in India he can pay a computer wiz $5 to use photoshop to create these pics.

Judging on the quality of some of the photoshops he must have payed a lot less then that

[VictimOfDHT]

I can't believe you people actually give this scam even a minute of your time. You must be newbies. But then I realize there are millions of men out there who are like that -desperate and believe almost anything they see/hear (on hair loss treatments).

I can almost guarantee you this IS a scam and soon will be forgotten just like the many scams before it.

Pics DON'T prove jack sh*t, at least in this case. You know you can make a bald guy have a full head of hair with something called "computer". You're like my brother, he sees a pic of a bald guy in an ad, then the same guy with hair after some magical treatment and he believes it. If this bastard is in India he can pay a computer wiz $5 to use photoshop to create these pics.

Remember, if someone has a real treatment for hair loss, the media will be on him within minutes and the dead will hear about it before the living. Someone who comes up with a treatment has the potential to make billions of dollars once he puts it on the market. But this jackassss crook SOB is hiding, just like all the other crooks of course- they prefer to do their scam operation quitely without attracting attention to their scam, well, except the attention of the naive, gullible and the desperate men, so he can prey quitely on them. Piece of filth.

[neversaynever]

One guy said hes taking tablets for 6 months. What tablets? Dr Nigam, if you're still on this thread please let us know what tablets they are

[ALLISWELL]

Just found the Nigam's Video Testimonials:

http://www.drnigams.net/video-testimonial.html

but they do not show us any results...

[Thinning@30]

There is nothing in the pictures that couldn't be accomplished with concealers, changes in length, lighting, angle, etc.

Agreed. Website is beyond the joke, but still new photos are pretty promising.

http://www.drnigams.net/images/big_49.jpg

Promising?! Dr. Nigam even admits this patient has had FUE.

Haha. He seems easily scared, and doesnt answer questions directly, even the technical questions. I think if he was good at answering questions without dancing around the subject and getting philosophical, peoples attitude would be very different. Plus word for word copying other studies into in answers is a bit odd to me. We all want a reason to take him seriously, but he hasnt given anything really

He's just quoting other studies to give himself a veneer of legitimacy and disguise the fact that he has nothing.

This whole thing has gotten ridiculous. If this Dr. has found the holy grail of hair loss research and accomplished something that Aderans, Histogen, Follica, Replicel, et al with all their resources and years of study have yet to do, there is no reason for him not to publish his findings in respectable journals and involve the mainstream media. Instead, we find him lurking on online forums trying to use poor quality photos and technobabble to sell treatments to unsophisticated hair loss sufferers.

[neversaynever]

dunno.

you could see nanogen/toppik particles clearly at this zoom level. I use it every day so I know.

It's not it. But yeah, the hair is darker, if you all hadn't scared dr nigam away, maybe we would here some comments.

if its not toppik then its mildly interesting. Very mild though! I hope we have some progress (good or bad) before feb 2013. Ill be in his city in early feb.

[neversaynever]

dunno.

you could see nanogen/toppik particles clearly at this zoom level. I use it every day so I know.

It's not it. But yeah, the hair is darker, if you all hadn't scared dr nigam away, maybe we would here some comments.

Haha. He seems easily scared, and doesnt answer questions directly, even the technical questions. I think if he was good at answering questions without dancing around the subject and getting philosophical, peoples attitude would be very different. Plus word for word copying other studies into in answers is a bit odd to me. We all want a reason to take him seriously, but he hasnt given anything really.

either way, we should know alot more over the next 2-3 months (or even few weeks with OBI).

[bananana]

But whys his hair colour different?

For this picture they might have grown his hair out longer and used toppik or something. That might explain the colour difference too

dunno.

you could see nanogen/toppik particles clearly at this zoom level. I use it every day so I know.

It's not it. But yeah, the hair is darker, if you all hadn't scared dr nigam away, maybe we would here some comments.

[neversaynever]

Agreed. Website is beyond the joke, but still new photos are pretty promising.

http://www.drnigams.net/images/big_49.jpg

But whys his hair colour different?

For this picture they might have grown his hair out longer and used toppik or something. That might explain the colour difference too

[bananana]

Agreed. Website is beyond the joke, but still new photos are pretty promising.

http://www.drnigams.net/images/big_49.jpg

[neversaynever]

We'll see soon, I'm very much interested in OBI's results and of course science papers, collaborations etc. that should go out early next year.

I don't know, but those new photos on the site (http://www.drnigams.net/images/big_50.jpg) are definitely no photoshop or hair fibres or FUE (?) as far as I can see. This guy has thicker and way more hair any way you look at it.

I remain optimistically sceptic.
(some of you will say I remain a fool, but I dont care...)

Not sure how you navigate his ridiculous website to find these new photos.

There's way too much about Nigam that does not make sense, but I admit I'm curious. That photo doesn't prove anything. Once again its at a funny angle and he didnt have the sense to cut the hair down to match the length of the original. Then we could see clearly what exactly has happened.

It is within the nature of indian consumers to behave like this. They are not as critical as their western counterparts. Example: If someone on this forum had HM successfully, they would probably put some effort in to make a few decent photos and might cut their hair to make things clearer (look at the Gho saga). That kind of thinking is not in the average Indian consumers mind (I know this from a huge amount of personal experience). I wonder if theres any popular bald forums in india? Maybe people on there are talking about nigam.

Im curious enough to keep an open mind, but so far there is only one positive. The photo with Dr Lauster! How crazy is that? We shall see...

I'll be in India soon, i hope Nigam presents enough material to at least make me curious. Believe me, if im in his clinic, i will get the scoop and expose him for what he is.

Added: OBI is for real, and will be there in a few days. Lets hope he really digs when hes there.

[bananana]

If it's too good to be true, then it isn't true. I didn't even care to read up on this "treatment" or "doctor" because my rule of thumb is, if something works as good as someone claims, why is it still a secret that hardly any one seems to know about?

We'll see soon, I'm very much interested in OBI's results and of course science papers, collaborations etc. that should go out early next year.

I don't know, but those new photos on the site (http://www.drnigams.net/images/big_50.jpg) are definitely no photoshop or hair fibres or FUE (?) as far as I can see. This guy has thicker and way more hair any way you look at it.

I remain optimistically sceptic.
(some of you will say I remain a fool, but I dont care...)