Histogen – TrichoScan analysis vs. side-by-side comparison

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2020
    replied
    is gutted being paid by TRX2 people or what? What is going on?

    Originally posted by gutted
    of course its, wild to assume, random assumptions from this without scientific backing. But mpb is a cancer protection mechanism!
    explain... if so then it's doing a poor job since balding people have twice the risk of prostate cancer as normal people. Differences are quite small but significant in a clinical setting.

    Leave a comment:


  • gutted
    replied
    Originally posted by garethbale
    Is this a wind up...you're aware Sawyze is dead right?
    yeah i know?

    Leave a comment:


  • garethbale
    replied
    Originally posted by gutted
    what surprise?
    Is this a wind up...you're aware Sawyze is dead right?

    Leave a comment:


  • gutted
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    You have to know - furious people are mostly completely unable to think (or to click a link) ...
    lol most of your links are full of rubbish & cartoon characters!

    Leave a comment:


  • gutted
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    You should click on that Patrick Swayze link.... youre going to be in for a surprise.
    what surprise?

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    You should click on that Patrick Swayze link.... youre going to be in for a surprise.
    You have to know - furious people are mostly completely unable to think (or to click a link) ...

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by gutted
    that should tell you something -> patrick swazye aint bald yet he has cancer.
    patrick stewart has no cancer yet he -> is bald.

    of course its, wild to assume, random assumptions from this without scientific backing. But mpb is a cancer protection mechanism!
    You should click on that Patrick Swayze link.... youre going to be in for a surprise.

    Leave a comment:


  • gutted
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623

    How about Mr. Patrick Swayze ?
    that should tell you something -> patrick swazye aint bald yet he has cancer.
    patrick stewart has no cancer yet he -> is bald.

    of course its, wild to assume, random assumptions from this without scientific backing. But mpb is a cancer protection mechanism!

    Leave a comment:


  • gutted
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623

    How about Mr. Patrick Swayze ?
    that should tell you something -> patrick swazye aint bald yet he has cancer.
    patrick stewart has no cancer yet he -> is bald.

    of course its, wild to assume, random assumptions from this without scientific backing. But mpb is a cancer protection mechanism!

    Leave a comment:


  • gutted
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623


    How about Mr. Patrick Swayze ?
    its a good job his lifestyle together with his immune system keeps those cancers under control!

    Leave a comment:


  • gutted
    replied
    Originally posted by 25 going on 65
    Why compare Histogen to Gho? One revives/augments follicles, the other moves them around (transplantation surgery).
    The practice of relocating follicles is not a baldness cure or treatment, it's a reaction to baldness. It's a way of covering up the damage AGA has already done. It has its uses today, but it needs to be phased out asap. That's why it's important for these companies to be working on real regenerative approaches, even if their final market products don't fully reverse the condition. Every step we make in moving past implanted follicles (as opposed to revived follicles) is a good thing.
    I agree.

    10 char

    Leave a comment:


  • 25 going on 65
    replied
    Why compare Histogen to Gho? One revives/augments follicles, the other moves them around (transplantation surgery).
    The practice of relocating follicles is not a baldness cure or treatment, it's a reaction to baldness. It's a way of covering up the damage AGA has already done. It has its uses today, but it needs to be phased out asap. That's why it's important for these companies to be working on real regenerative approaches, even if their final market products don't fully reverse the condition. Every step we make in moving past implanted follicles (as opposed to revived follicles) is a good thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • dex89
    replied
    Originally posted by 534623
    I saw what you did there. LMAO

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by gutted

    aggressive balders have more to worry about than "aggressive hairloss" they are more susceptible to various cancers than "normal, slow balders" are susceptible to.


    How about Mr. Patrick Swayze ?

    Leave a comment:


  • gutted
    replied
    Originally posted by Breaking Bald
    What??? Since when? This is news to me, why is this the case???
    lool relax!! its my educated hunch, no proven study, although you may be aware of a link between prostate cancer and mpb. IMO Its the so called "aggressive balders" that suffer from it the most.

    Leave a comment:

Working...