Replicel, Histogen and aderans will work. Allergan will work but it will only be another effective treatment, maybe more effective, we will see. Replicel and Histogen combined will provide a true cure for hereditary hair loss. HST is FUE and as such it doesn't even belong in the discussion.
Replicel will definitely not work. They are DOA.
Aderans may work further down the line (because they pretty much have enough the money to throw shit at the wall and hope something sticks. They might find something effective enough for commercialization)
Labeling a procedure as something it is clearly not is not healthy and appropriate skepticism, it is borderline libel.
At this time, is not "clear" that HST is not FUE. All appropriate good qualtiy evidence thus far suggest it is just FUE. Very good FUE but still just FUE. Gho has not yet proven anything beyond that at this time. This is being looked at very thoroughly now though, so that may change. But for now, it is still just FUE. There is no case for libel that could stand up in a court of law at this time.
efficacy and effectiveness of Gho's method been validated, confirmed and confessed. nothing more to discuss really, although he's still perfecting his craft.
Replicel been found out and exposed. last I heard they shut up shop for good, pay them no mind...
efficacy and effectiveness of Gho's method been validated, confirmed and confessed. nothing more to discuss really, although he's still perfecting his craft.
Replicel been found out and exposed. last I heard they shut up shop for good, pay them no mind...
They haven't yet. They are a public company and can't just vanish like that. However, they probably only have about 6-9 months worth of cash left.
What is the main diff between Histogen and Replicel?
Both seem to revolve around the cultivation and injeciton of cells into the scalp.
J
Don't know the exact science with it but essentially both are in Phase II but Histogen has been getting great results(from what i've read, the worst performer got a 40% increase in hair density in the injection area after 3 months, best getting around 60-70%) while Repicel the best performer so far has gotten 10-15% increase in hair count/density.
Repicel needs to go back to the drawing board, Histogen looks like it's well on it's way to Phase III.
Replicel = Injections of patient's own cultivated cells.
Histogen has been getting incredible results EARLY. Replicel is on their way to having same or better results. People are just a little negative because it's a step, not a leap to that goal.
Histogen on the other hand, just happen to make that leap
Replicel = Injections of patient's own cultivated cells.
Histogen has been getting incredible results EARLY. Replicel is on their way to having same or better results. People are just a little negative because it's a step, not a leap to that goal.
Histogen on the other hand, just happen to make that leap
Ah ok got it now. However is Histogen going to be used as a regrowth application? As in stimulate existing hair or vellus hairs to become terminal? Does it have anything to do with reviving dormant follicles? Or will Replicel be the appropriate application for that? eg growing hairs on bald areas
My opinion is that histogen will be a short term solution where many of us can get many successful results. Replicel will be the long term cure but who the hell knows when they will perfect it. Histogen will buy us plenty of time until replicel or something else comes out.
Ah ok got it now. However is Histogen going to be used as a regrowth application? As in stimulate existing hair or vellus hairs to become terminal? Does it have anything to do with reviving dormant follicles? Or will Replicel be the appropriate application for that? eg growing hairs on bald areas
J
Spencer did a few interviews with Histogen, I recommend you listen to all of them in their entirety.
Histogen did inject in slick bald spots, and got regrowth. Just listen to interviews, great inside info.
Comment