Neogenic by L’Oréal

[Erick]

We should take what we can

I think someone from the forum should call in the show when this product comes out and declare himself the guinea pig for this treatment. Update us on the side effects and positives. If there is a 5% gain of hair, then I think it's a start, although that thing will be very expensive

[Knockin on NW4]

The average of 1700 hairs gained was only after 3 months of use with one application per day. 1700 hairs for us$300 sounds like a deal to me. Granted you more than likely have to keep using it on a regular basis, but imagine if the results keep increasing up to the one year mark..... And I doubt the price will stay that high for long. It will get cheaper with time.

[Maradona]

There's been worst

1700 new hairs is not a cure, but it is significant.

Wait until september, if people waste hundreds of dollars in weird chemicals from obscure labs in China, there are going to be people willing to spend 90 euros on this crap

In a few months we'll see if this is a snake oil or not

Weird chemicals that at least made to clinical trials in humans and showed results.

Not snake oils.

i can't believe this forum is so retarded to even discuss this so much. No other forum is doing it, you guys really reached low.

[Conpecia]

Weird chemicals that at least made to clinical trials in humans and showed results.

Not snake oils.

i can't believe this forum is so retarded to even discuss this so much. No other forum is doing it, you guys really reached low.

It's just because it's being released soon and people need hope. When I first heard of this stuff on here everybody was slamming it and then somebody said, "But what if it really worked, wouldn't that be funny..." Suddenly it's the most important topic on this part of the forum. I for one am not interested in being let down again, so my hopes aren't high.

[Sogeking]

Why is everyone dishing on people willing to try this new stuff. I mean it is their money, their time, their hair. If they grow something those who are realistic, pragmatic and scepctical will wait for pictures as proof, the tohers will buy it and try it regardless...
Look at Trx2 thread, same few guys are still talking abou it. No pics, no proof but if they want to continue buying let 'em...

[Artista]

Good point Sogeking, Again I'll say this ..I'm surprised that Joe has not contributed to this thread. He seemed to be very excited about this L'Oreal product. His point was that L'Oreal was releasing it as a cosmetic to 'circumvent' the time and cost it would take for FDA approval.

[UK_]

Good point Sogeking, Again I'll say this ..I'm surprised that Joe has not contributed to this thread. He seemed to be very excited about this L'Oreal product. His point was that L'Oreal was releasing it as a cosmetic to 'circumvent' the time and cost it would take for FDA approval.

Its most likely a cosmetic because it doesnt work lol. They will say things like that to make you think its more effective then it actually is, all bullshit greedy corporate marketing.

[Artista]

You may be right UK, we shall see. Ive never really informed myself about the TRX2 products or had followed the thread related to it. Apparently that thread has over 4,300 replies and over 587,834 views. Not saying that it gives it any merit either way. Without getting into any deep discussions over it, what has that earlier product done?

[gutted]

i guess the only way anyone can debunk this as garbage is by actually trying it out.

i will be trying this when it comes out, only on my temples, which have no hair so ANY growth will be clearley visible.

The main way this probably operates is by increasing density per cm2 and density is someting which cant really be distinguished by users vision even photographs may be useless in determining if this actually grows hair or not in people that have some hair on thier scalps.

anyway i guess we will know more information i.e studies,pictures etc prior to launching thier product.

[Artista]

"i guess we will know more information i.e studies,pictures etc prior to launching their product"
Very true Gutted, lets just wait and see. If it does have actual efficacy like that of Minoxidil then ill pass. But lets not assume.

[UK_]

They do this every 5 years or so now... last time it was Aminexil or something by that name, this time it is neogenic.

All bullshit lies and marketing.

Our only hope is Team Tokyo Histogen if can grow on slick bald and Replicel.

[gutted]

IF this works it works via a different mechanism than minoxidil, which should be a big bonus. i.e it wont be "a for life" treatment, rather a 3/6 month periodical treatment.

The hairs will probably last a few anagen hair cycles before they begin to minuturaise again.

Bear in mind dr cots research was funded by loreal, and this is what this treatment is based on and it seems to me dr cots perhaps already knew about this "lotion" since he mentioned this in his interviews with the press.

i think we can only speculate right now, we should know more until more info is released by them in the next few months.

[Mentalist]

This product is to be made with fruit extracts such as grape extract. I'm not dismissing it but I've heard some real horror stories with people using hair products by l'oreal by losing their hair. I tend to stay clear of l'oreal products.

[gmonasco]

last time it was Aminexil or something by that name

http://www.theinfomine.com/2010/09/02/does-aminexil-prevent-hair-loss/

[Kirby_]

This product is to be made with fruit extracts such as grape extract.

Oh dear, it gets worse. I can see the naturalist fallacy inevitably being wheeled out in the advertising of this product.