Something new?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • jman91
    replied
    bump 10 charrrrrrrrrrrr

    Leave a comment:


  • clandestine
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    I live only 1 hour from Toronto and make *very* frequent trips there. I'll give them a call soon or pay them a visit in person. I'll get the info needed (unless its been posted already, I'm still trying to figure out what this is all about)
    The info needed has not been posted already. If you do happen to make the trip let us know, any update would be greatly appreciated.

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by elvispresley
    there is a way to find the forum users from CANADA?
    so we can contact them and maybe they can contact the patients...
    I live only 1 hour from Toronto and make *very* frequent trips there. I'll give them a call soon or pay them a visit in person. I'll get the info needed (unless its been posted already, I'm still trying to figure out what this is all about)

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by inspects
    Clandestine,

    Their not off to a good start, their Trademark was denied by the US Patent Office, who mailed them their denial letter Nov 26th 2012.
    US Patent Office is ridiculously broken and corrupt (look into how shady their organization considering what theyve allowed Apple Inc. to patent).

    However, would the loss of a patent in USA still allow the company continue its efforts and eventually a product in Canada?

    Leave a comment:


  • clandestine
    replied
    Originally posted by inspects
    Clandestine,

    Their not off to a good start, their Trademark was denied by the US Patent Office, who mailed them their denial letter Nov 26th 2012.
    Ah, thanks for the heads up, inspects. I suppose they neglected to include this little bit of information in their news feed.

    Leave a comment:


  • inspects
    replied
    Originally posted by clandestine
    Finding out they're located in Toronto;


    Thinking about contacting them via telephone, just not sure what kinds of things I would ask in order to test the validity of their claims.

    I mean, they're pushing enough money into this, can we be sure they're entirely fake? And yes, I'm in complete agreeance that their pictures are shoddy.
    Clandestine,

    Their not off to a good start, their Trademark was denied by the US Patent Office, who mailed them their denial letter Nov 26th 2012.

    Leave a comment:


  • clandestine
    replied
    Finding out they're located in Toronto;


    Thinking about contacting them via telephone, just not sure what kinds of things I would ask in order to test the validity of their claims.

    I mean, they're pushing enough money into this, can we be sure they're entirely fake? And yes, I'm in complete agreeance that their pictures are shoddy.

    Leave a comment:


  • UK_
    replied
    rolf Im not saying anything.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJJJrS
    replied
    If you look at the before and after results, they blast the before pictures with flash while the after pictures use much less lighting. Even with the camera tricks, the results aren't impressive.

    Unfortunately, there's so many ways these type of clinics can manipulate results - bright vs. dark lighting, wet vs. dry hair, different angles, different hairstyles, concealer etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • clandestine
    replied
    Originally posted by Dazza
    no media coverage at all makes this product seem abit off.
    even the PGD2 report got on the news.

    If this product was as good as they claimed it would be everywhere by now, celebs would be promoting this stuff.
    Maybe.

    They're spending a shit ton of money on patents.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dazza
    replied
    no media coverage at all makes this product seem abit off.
    even the PGD2 report got on the news.

    If this product was as good as they claimed it would be everywhere by now, celebs would be promoting this stuff.

    Leave a comment:


  • clandestine
    replied
    New website is up.



    Latest news:
    Biologix Hair Science Ltd.™ Makes US$ 525,000 Payment on R&D Partnership Agreement with Beijing Institute of Technology

    Leave a comment:


  • gmonasco
    replied
    Originally posted by NotBelievingIt
    You missed my point/question, or I badly worded it.
    I got your point; I'm saying that it's moot because I haven't see anyone claim, much less prove, that the incidence of MPB in Japanese males has specifically increased among the 20s-30s age group in the post-war area. All such claims just generally state that MPB was "virtually unknown" (among all males) in Japan prior to WWII.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotBelievingIt
    replied
    I'm not saying there is, I'm indirectly asking if there is.


    You missed my point/question, or I badly worded it.

    Leave a comment:


  • gmonasco
    replied
    Originally posted by NotBelievingIt
    But if the onset is occuring more at the typical 20-30 then that demographic rate change is due to something else.
    Where is the evidence that Japanese men in the 20s-30s age range are experiencing a greater incidence of hair loss?

    Leave a comment:

Working...