Is HASCI for real?

[NeedHairASAP]

I am seeing some fine hairs - which might get stronger - and from your pictures on hairsite, I am seeing FUEs taken from an extremely dense donor area in the first place.

It will be hard to establish whether the hairs have regenerated in the donor area, because there are no close ups.

Also, we can't really see how the fine 0.6mm holes are - or how they compare to 1mm holes for instance. It looks good, but so do good 1mm FUE sites.

To me, it looks like another carefully selected Gho patient, with no conclusive pictures.

Whether you are in on it or not is beside the point. The pictures can not prove donor regeneration.

I hope it works out for you.

Anyone else going to Gho - PLEASE INSIST ON BETTER PHOTOS.

a. is Dean Saunders a "carefully selected gho patient"? the guys nw7

b. We have close ups of GCs head. In them we see hairs sprouting from red holes.... GC is a third party and his outcome matches the peer-reviewed outcomes Gho had.. both Gho's paper and GC's forum pictures (albeit each of differing quality) both show that hairs are sprouting from red holes... So to say we can't see something that is probably regeneration is rediculous

[CVAZBAR]

a. is Dean Saunders a "carefully selected gho patient"? the guys nw7

b. We have close ups of GCs head. In them we see hairs sprouting from red holes.... GC is a third party and his outcome matches the peer-reviewed outcomes Gho had.. both Gho's paper and GC's forum pictures (albeit each of differing quality) both show that hairs are sprouting from red holes... So to say we can't see something that is probably regeneration is rediculous

So when are you getting it done bro?

[gc83uk]

I am seeing some fine hairs - which might get stronger - and from your pictures on hairsite, I am seeing FUEs taken from an extremely dense donor area in the first place.

It will be hard to establish whether the hairs have regenerated in the donor area, because there are no close ups.

Also, we can't really see how the fine 0.6mm holes are - or how they compare to 1mm holes for instance. It looks good, but so do good 1mm FUE sites.

To me, it looks like another carefully selected Gho patient, with no conclusive pictures.

Whether you are in on it or not is beside the point. The pictures can not prove donor regeneration.

I hope it works out for you.

Anyone else going to Gho - PLEASE INSIST ON BETTER PHOTOS.

So did you miss this close up picture http://www.fileden.com/files/2011/9/...onor%20010.jpg

What do you mean by insisting on better photos? Gho didn't take them. I've taken all of my own photos.

[NeedHairASAP]

So when are you getting it done bro?

is that really your only response you have, bro?

I guess I won that argument?

and to answer you're lame response in question form-- I have a consultation booked this June, bitch





I guess CVbazer is trying to make this argument:

"some people who think Gho's procedure works dont have money or time to get the procedure immediately, therefore the procedure doesn't work"

nice argument CV












@GC - dont even bother bickering with these people GC. Just keep posting photos. For every 1 loser who doesn't appreciate it, there are 12 that do.

[NeedHairASAP]

I am seeing some fine hairs - which might get stronger - and from your pictures on hairsite, I am seeing FUEs taken from an extremely dense donor area in the first place.

therefore what? you see a dense donor area, therefore.......? therefore we should ignore the other photos of scars with hair growing out of them?



what is wrong with you people?

whats more plausible?:

Gho is splitting follicular units with 99% precision

or

Gho is leaving enough tissue behind to regenerate hairs





I've read Gho's explanation of the procedure and it sounds more plausible (and much easier to perform) than it would be to split Follicular Units with 99% precision



first it was, "there is no regrowth"

then we saw regrowth and it was, "he's just splitting hairs"

then, "what about recipient growth?"

then we saw that and now its, "we don't have enough evidence"

something tells me it may take awhile for this to get mainstream recognition...





Gho's procedure is scientifically plausible and works off the same science as all your beloved "cell technology" pixar-movie-making companies.... and on top of that he has a peer reviewed paper, recipient results posted on his site, and we have GC proving both donor regrowth (of some kind) and recipient regrowth (to some extent), yet....... Follica's pixar cartoon movies are more evidence than Gho has...

[damielmillo]

Hey NeedHairASAP, don´t be bored with some users...if they don´t want to beleive is their problem...
We know and see that Gho is legit and we will have the procedure in 2012 so, be quiet...i think that we are winning more than some users that only want to have negative reviews...
I have date for May 2012...i hope they can extract more than 1700 grafts...
what do you think?

[RichardDawkins]

Oh before i forget about it.

The question if hasci is legit...

Ask Dr Cole who got donor regrowth also, ask him if Gho is legit.

Its funny that people also ignore Cole when the attack Gho, effin Hippocrites

[CVAZBAR]

is that really your only response you have, bro?

I guess I won that argument?

and to answer you're lame response in question form-- I have a consultation booked this June, bitch

I guess CVbazer is trying to make this argument:
"some people who think Gho's procedure works dont have money or time to get the procedure immediately, therefore the procedure doesn't work"

nice argument CV

@GC - dont even bother bickering with these people GC. Just keep posting photos. For every 1 loser who doesn't appreciate it, there are 12 that do.

What the **** haha????? Were we really having an argument? I was asking you a serious question. You want to argue about something that's been talked about a million times?

I clearly said that if I had the money, I would probably do it for the minimal scars but since I was not 100% sure about the regeneration, you get emotional and offended? Give me a ****ing break! The only one acting like a bitch is you! I was asking you a serious question you ****ing idiot!

What the **** do you want me to argue that hasnt been said already? You might as well challenge every one in the forum or maybe you can call Spencer, since he isn't completely sure either. He might have a new argument ha.

[CVAZBAR]

Yes its the circled area.

Good luck mate, you won't regret it.

Hey GC, are you taking any medication? Fin or Dut?

[neversaynever]

gc83uk.....

Finding all the posts a bit confusing. Did you have the injection method or standard transplant method with Gho??

If its injection, im confused as to why there isnt a bigger fuss being made about it. Hes injecting stem cells extracted from the donor area, and new hairs are growing in the recepient.

If this is true...then why cant gho just culture these cells (over 3 months like replicell) and implant......

Even if they can just double the amount of cells, it would amazing!

Really wish they would answer emails quicker. Im so ready to book a procedure!

[NeedHairASAP]

gc83uk.....

Finding all the posts a bit confusing. Did you have the injection method or standard transplant method with Gho??

If its injection, im confused as to why there isnt a bigger fuss being made about it. Hes injecting stem cells extracted from the donor area, and new hairs are growing in the recepient.

If this is true...then why cant gho just culture these cells (over 3 months like replicell) and implant......

Really wish they would answer emails quicker. Im so ready to book a procedure!

apparently culturing cells is not easy and I dont believe it has been accomplished by anybody yet (even replicel).... cells can turn cancerous etc.

I'm sure if Gho could culture them he would, and if Gho could, then replicel wouldn't be dumping so much money into trying to do it...



the fact that the stem cells are growing after being injected isn't really that exciting... any hair transplant works off this same principle.. Go just injects the necessary part that was extracted, while most surgeons insert the neccessary part and some other tissue and the extracted follicle

[NeedHairASAP]

What the **** haha????? Were we really having an argument? I was asking you a serious question. You want to argue about something that's been talked about a million times?

I clearly said that if I had the money, I would probably do it for the minimal scars but since I was not 100% sure about the regeneration, you get emotional and offended? Give me a ****ing break! The only one acting like a bitch is you! I was asking you a serious question you ****ing idiot!

What the **** do you want me to argue that hasnt been said already? You might as well challenge every one in the forum or maybe you can call Spencer, since he isn't completely sure either. He might have a new argument ha.

We see red dots with hairs coming out of them. These photos are from a third party (forum user) and in an article in a peer reviewed journal. Therefore, at this point, Gho is either splitting follicular units in half with 90%+ precision, or he is regenerating hairs the way he claims he is-- there is NO in between.


Its pretty well known that the cells Gho targets and uses will theoretically work the way he says. They are why a plucked hair regrows and why a full-on FUE graft does not. Thats proven science.

So after considering all of this, I see red holes with hairs coming out of them in a peer reviewed paper and also in photos posted on a forum, which leads me to be practically 100% positive that Gho is not splitting hairs and that he is regenerating them in the donor-- using science that can be demonstrated in your own home by plucking a hair out of your head and watching it regrow-- aka the cells are on the bottom and sides of the follicle and they will regenerate when left there.




I just can't stand people claiming there is no evidence-- when there is more evidence than histogen's three little tiny pictures or follicas pixar movies

[gc83uk]

Hey GC, are you taking any medication? Fin or Dut?

No medication as such, only minox, I haven't really been using it if i'm honest, might remember once a week to spray some on.

Hi neversaynever, I had HSI, which is basically the same as HST except with hsi, the hair is 'injected' into the scalp at the same time as the hole in the scalp is made. I think with hst, the hole is created first and then the hair is inserted later. That's the simplest form of explanation, there is a load more detail at hasci.com

[damielmillo]

gc83uk, when are you going to see Gho?

[gc83uk]

2 weeks mate