Is this legit? (patent)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • outbulk
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2015
    • 7

    Is this legit? (patent)

    The present invention provides a composition to treat androgenetic alopecia in men and female pattern hair loss in women, thinning disorders, alopecia areata, alopecia totalis and promotes hair growth even in peeled regions. The present invention relates to preparation based on a vegetal extract of coniferous trees mixed with a keratin derivatives compounds, and a process for preparing the same. The preparations of the product object of the invention are in suitable formulation (gel, lotion, cream...) for local use in an effective quantity, directly in the affected body region to be treated.


    According to their claims, would be superior to the current treatments. Thoughts?
  • ShookOnes
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 209

    #2
    Stopped reading after tree extract

    Comment

    • NeedHairASAP
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 1408

      #3
      Originally posted by outbulk
      http://www.google.com/patents/WO2008036054A2?cl=en

      According to their claims, would be superior to the current treatments. Thoughts?
      All patents say that because you can't get a patent unless your invention is useful/better/novel.

      Comment

      • jamesst11
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2014
        • 1067

        #4
        Originally posted by outbulk
        http://www.google.com/patents/WO2008036054A2?cl=en

        According to their claims, would be superior to the current treatments. Thoughts?
        well, this patent was filed in 2007. I really can't understand how coniferous tree extract and keratin could counteract MPB...

        Comment

        • baldybald
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2012
          • 243

          #5
          You guys keep posting this useless thread!! Come on this 2015 already

          Comment

          • polios
            Member
            • Oct 2015
            • 74

            #6
            Sure that treatment from 2007 will make a difference now. Certainly there must be some truth about it but why should that be superior to what we have now? Like baldybald told: It is 2015.

            Comment

            Working...