US government owned patent on hair follicle neogensis
Collapse
X
-
-
So has dr christiano & jahoda. What I would like to know what percent gene expression have the follicles maintained,Dr. Christiano's maintained 22%. Has he tried his method in humans? If not, when is he planning to? Any luck in contacting him or his assistant?Comment
-
Yep... I see no point is avoiding the concept of hope, but there was a little bit more optimism than i would've expected seeing as it's merely a patentComment
-
Yes renee, i saw another company who sell it also. But as we need our own cells, those things is just for hair research, drug testing,etc.. for the moment
Jay, I would answer yes to your 2 posts, but you know i'm in the optimist way lol
In my opinion, as it's regenerative medecine, the term 'topical' in the Wake forest trial would mean extraction of the cells (make them what they need) and then precise application topically ( as it's said in the patent:
"methods are disclosed herein for transplanting cells capable of inducing human hair follicles to a subject, comprising delivering to a human subject any of the microspheres described above. In some embodiments, the microsphere is subdermally or intradermally delivered to a subject."
So "regenerative medecine" is that kind of sh.., and it's what Wake forest is dedicated to, so I really don't think that the term 'topical' here mean they are testing an "Androgen spray, Minox 2.0, or other BS",
Slam , I'm not sure you received health awards,etc with just claims, for me they have somethingComment
-
That is actually not true.
You can apply for a patent under those conditions, but no member of the World Trade Organization would grant you a patent unless your invention works.Comment
-
Actually you're wrong. People patent new concepts that could theoretically work based on a design and a patent filing.
You hear stories all the time of tech businesses filing patents and then doing nothing at all in that space because either a) it's not possible b) they just don't want other people doing itComment
-
set aside all of this speculation, I talked to the receptionist at Wake Health. She had a Carolinian accent and interupted me saying "Now that study is all filled up (with trial patients)" "....I'm Sorry!" So whatever the hell Wake is up to it's definitely under wayComment
-
Ok so what exactly is it that they have? I'm not making any claims other than a patent is not a game changer, but you are claiming that they have something... So, what is it? What is there to be just jumping out of my socks for? What's the process, what's the yield, what does this treatment that you say is likely to work consist of? I mean they obviously have something, so I will patiently wait for your explanation outlining what it is they have... I would tell you my thoughts, but for for the obvious reason of not receiving health awards I'm barred from speaking an opinion regarding this...Yes renee, i saw another company who sell it also. But as we need our own cells, those things is just for hair research, drug testing,etc.. for the moment
Jay, I would answer yes to your 2 posts, but you know i'm in the optimist way lol
In my opinion, as it's regenerative medecine, the term 'topical' in the Wake forest trial would mean extraction of the cells (make them what they need) and then precise application topically ( as it's said in the patent:
"methods are disclosed herein for transplanting cells capable of inducing human hair follicles to a subject, comprising delivering to a human subject any of the microspheres described above. In some embodiments, the microsphere is subdermally or intradermally delivered to a subject."
So "regenerative medecine" is that kind of sh.., and it's what Wake forest is dedicated to, so I really don't think that the term 'topical' here mean they are testing an "Androgen spray, Minox 2.0, or other BS",
Slam , I'm not sure you received health awards,etc with just claims, for me they have somethingComment
-
Renee all I'm saying is if you read a lot of the comments in this thread, that people are basing success solely on where it's coming from rather than information regarding the product or service... I haven't said it won't work, I haven't said that it would, I've simply said sweet, guess we keep waiting... We have NO information to base any decisions off of yet, so what's the chatters out? That the U.S. Government which by the way has been involved in many failed investments, is involved in this?Comment
-
Rumor sites love to publish patents that don't make any sense. The assumption is that they file those patents just to confuse competitorsActually you're wrong. People patent new concepts that could theoretically work based on a design and a patent filing.
You hear stories all the time of tech businesses filing patents and then doing nothing at all in that space because either a) it's not possible b) they just don't want other people doing itComment
Comment