Follicept Trials- Discussion About Trial Only

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • nameless
    replied
    Originally posted by Jagger
    If you recall (you don't), I supported the idea of a forum test and even gave YOU my blessing as a tester, as convincing you would go a long way toward convincing other doubters. And if you read the rest of the goddamned comment, you would see my justification for feeling this way.
    Don't take it too personal Jagger. I lurked for years before making a post too and every last person here knows I'm a real person and everyone also knows I'm doing the best I can to make logical judgments. That's not to say that everyone agrees with the things I say (for example, almost everyone disagrees with my opinion about Nigam) but everyone knows I'm a real person doing my best to make my own conclusions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jagger
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Of course you don't. You're a 6 year long forum lurker (your own words), just with a 2015 account. Since you've been on this forum for so long (6 years you've been lurking here you said, so that's quite some experience you got there) you already know that we don't need much proof. A forum test, that's totally unnecessary, a waste of time. Shaved hair, who cares about that, we dont need that. Just tell us when we can buy it !
    If you recall (you don't), I supported the idea of a forum test and even gave YOU my blessing as a tester, as convincing you would go a long way toward convincing other doubters. And if you read the rest of the goddamned comment, you would see my justification for feeling this way.

    Leave a comment:


  • follicept
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    IF it's OVERWHELMINGLY good we MAY. Hardly a commitment to screwing you over.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by stayhopeful
    no dude no one ever said that.
    Actually, he did: https://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showth...l=1#post205061

    So on basis of some photo's of his unshaven head and some others we can't verify, he wants to sell it. And then he raised the price.

    Leave a comment:


  • nameless
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Of course you don't. You're a 6 year long forum lurker (your own words), just with a 2015 account. Since you've been on this forum for so long (6 years you've been lurking here you said, so that's quite some experience you got there) you already know that we don't need much proof. A forum test, that's totally unnecessary, a waste of time. Shaved hair, who cares about that, we dont need that. Just tell us when we can buy it !
    Hey Arishi, what you're accusing Follicept of is exactly what Merck did with Propecia and it's exactly what Upjohn did with Roagine. Neither of those companies did TBT forum tests or buzz cutting of their subjects. So are Propecia and Rogaine frauds? LOL! You are trying to make it sound as if what you are asking is so perfectly and any industry standard but of course it is neither. People don't want to get buzz cuts. I understand that shorter hair will make it easier to tell if there is regrowth. I get your point but you can't make people get buzz cuts if they don't want to, and it really is unreasonable to demand forum trials. Go tell Jahoda that he has to do a forum test and see what he does. The expression you'll see on his face will be bewilderment as he will be wondering if you are an escaped loonie.

    Leave a comment:


  • stayhopeful
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Well that's Devon's plan. He even said he wants to start selling it on Indiegogo before the trial results are in. And he wanted to raise the price. So at least he must think people are going to buy it without decent proof.
    no dude no one ever said that. he said EXPLICITLY: He will only sell on Indiegogo if they have legitimate and verifiable proof of EFFICACY AND SAFETY. Not selling on Indiegogo until we see some legit pics/vids, he even said so bro, try to keep an open mind. This aint Nigam or other wackos, not a fair comparison. When did any of those other quacks provide that detailed of science?? Nigam etc sound like a bunch of elementary school students compared to HSU, you ain't making a fair comparison and you know it

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by stayhopeful
    Arashi you beginning to sound like a Schitzo no joke. .... no one is going to buy it if its a scam we are not dumb, just relax. once we see results then you can start making legitimate claims, right now you just fabricating stuff
    Well that's Devon's plan. He even said he wants to start selling it on Indiegogo before the trial results are in. And he wanted to raise the price. So at least he must think people are going to buy it without decent proof.

    Leave a comment:


  • stayhopeful
    replied
    Originally posted by follicept
    I certainly can't, still learning myself! Haha. Basically he thinks pulse of IGF-1 will reactivate receptors and make follicles re-enter anagen phase.

    Designed as maintenance, yes.
    If that's the case HURRY UP BRO!!!!!!! Lol. I'm rapidly descending

    Leave a comment:


  • follicept
    replied
    Originally posted by EXprettyboy
    Will this affect my beard?

    I like my beard, I don't want that reversed!
    No reason it should affect the beard. I have one too, so we will know soon enough!

    Leave a comment:


  • stayhopeful
    replied
    Arashi you beginning to sound like a Schitzo no joke. .... no one is going to buy it if its a scam we are not dumb, just relax. once we see results then you can start making legitimate claims, right now you just fabricating stuff

    Leave a comment:


  • follicept
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    I'm trying to understand your reasoning here. So on the one hand you have a shot at making billions of dollars. Yet on the other hand you dont want to put up decent proof and shave your hair to convince people here.

    Let's say you think yourself there's 33% chance this works. Simple maths teaches us that 33% of 3 billion dollars is still 1 billion dollar. So that's then what your company should be worth in your opinion. Yet you don't care about shaving your hair to make a very good case to prove it.

    Not trying to disrespect you, just trying to understand your reasoning. Cause I know that anybody with such chances of making so much money would probably shave ANY body part and post pictures here So, just trying to understand you why you don't want to shave with so much money lying within reach.
    You're convinced it won't work. So why should I shave my head? If it works, it will work very well, and it will be evident without a shaved head. That's the logic. Then, we progress into clinical trials with trichoscan and sophisticated quantification methods. You are linking to independent events and skipping the dependent step in the middle.

    Leave a comment:


  • follicept
    replied
    I certainly can't, still learning myself! Haha. Basically he thinks pulse of IGF-1 will reactivate receptors and make follicles re-enter anagen phase.

    Designed as maintenance, yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by Jagger
    I personally don't think a buzzcut is necessary
    Of course you don't. You're a 6 year long forum lurker (your own words), just with a 2015 account. Since you've been on this forum for so long (6 years you've been lurking here you said, so that's quite some experience you got there) you already know that we don't need much proof. A forum test, that's totally unnecessary, a waste of time. Shaved hair, who cares about that, we dont need that. Just tell us when we can buy it !

    Leave a comment:


  • EXprettyboy
    replied
    Will this affect my beard?

    I like my beard, I don't want that reversed!

    Leave a comment:


  • stayhopeful
    replied
    can someone please shed light on Dr. Hsu new powerpoint? I don't understand science that well...

    Also, very important question: Is this designed to be a maintenance treatment primarily? I am more than happy with that. but it seems like it will be primarily for maintenance like FIN and Rogaine

    Leave a comment:

Working...