Dr Lauster's Team (Berlin University of Technology)

[nameless]

This does seem like the more achievable route. To create an organ seems to be infinitely more difficult than reviving it's existing miniaturised counterpart.

I'd be interested to know how present these follicles are in the skin, especially considering a new graft can be implanted directly over the top of these existing follicles with no complications. You would think their presence would in some way alter the implanted graft.

I think you will end up with a mish-mash new and old follicles in there. The original follicles would still be in there and when the new lab-grown follicles were implanted there would be lots of instances of new and old follicles bumping into each other during the implantation process. I think it would get kind of messy inside of the skin.

[hosney7]

updates??

[beetee]

Well because not everybody is gonna report to you if they get success.

I don't know about that. There are a lot of people on here that seem primarily interested in bragging about the state of their hair and the supposed effectiveness of their treatment regiment.

[beetee]

b

[hellouser]

Dr. Uwe Marx's website has some interesting stuff:

http://www.tissuse.com/

Certain pages make it very clear about using their methods for:

Regenerative medicine including eventual implantation of laboratory-grown, organoid-based organs

Shitty thing is, is that they haven't shown the ability to produce a follicle that grows TERMINAL hair.

[joachim]

still no new website on hair multiplication online.
i wonder where desmond is all the time. he hasn't been here for a while.

[JZA70]

still no new website on hair multiplication online.
i wonder where desmond is all the time. he hasn't been here for a while.

Doesn't matter anyway, we're still at least a good decade away from anything useful happening. Wake me up when someone grows a terminal hair.

[BoSox]

Doesn't matter anyway, we're still at least a good decade away from anything useful happening. Wake me up when someone grows a terminal hair.

Not true, they are close.

[joachim]

Not true, they are close.

why do you think that?

[hgs1989]

still no new website on hair multiplication online.

check this link of the website hellouser posted : http://www.tissuse.com/science.html . it clearly says hair follicles in application areas + the word cosmetics. Dr laustrer is the first name if you clicked on scientific advisory board.

Not true, they are close.

how do you know that? even if they did generate terminal hair, we are how long before FDA approval ? better hope for the proven treatments coming sooner than later i.e. histogen (growth factors technology in general), replicel , and CB.

[sascha]

check this link of the website hellouser posted : http://www.tissuse.com/science.html . it clearly says hair follicles in application areas + the word cosmetics. Dr laustrer is the first name if you clicked on scientific advisory board.

how do you know that? even if they did generate terminal hair, we are how long before FDA approval ? better hope for the proven treatments coming sooner than later i.e. histogen (growth factors technology in general), replicel , and CB.

What has the FDA to do with Germany?

[hgs1989]

What has the FDA to do with Germany?

don't they have something equivalent in the european union or in germany itself.

[sascha]

Sure, but the decisions made by the EMA take less than half of these US-smugs.

[hellouser]

Sure, but the decisions made by the EMA take less than half of these US-smugs.

Comments like that put a big smile on my face.

[joachim]

Sure, but the decisions made by the EMA take less than half of these US-smugs.

sounds good. i wasn't aware of that. can you elaborate a bit on that? are there not 3 phases defined by the EMA? or are they just shorter?