Final Days: Chinese Scientists Have Solved the DP Culturing Problem! (2014)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi

    You misunderstood some things Ironman.
    Fortunately, you are the one understands everything correct ...
    Originally posted by Arashi

    Yeah they grew cosmetically correct HUMAN hair on mice, as you can see on the photo's.
    Pffffft ...
    Originally posted by Arashi
    You misunderstood some things Ironman. Tsuji lab wanted to show that it is possible to bio engineer human hair grafts producing human hair.
    Did I say something different?? Oops, I forgot:
    They tried to bio-engineer a penis on a mouse tooth.
    Originally posted by Arashi
    They just took existing cells and hair grew.
    Really? Scientists from Tsuji's lab? Just existing human cells?
    Come on, learn reading ...

    Originally posted by Arashi
    Those Chinese wanted to prove it's possible to culture dp cells without losing gene expression.
    Did I say something different?? Not really ... learn also reading posts.

    Originally posted by Arashi
    They were the first in the world to do that.
    Perhaps for a newbie like you - but not for me or other scientists in this field.

    So please, don't try to tell ME what they tried to accomplish and what material they used for their different experiments. AND, if you really find something wrong within my post, next time QUOTE these parts and PROVE me wrong with hard facts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Originally posted by Tenma
    According to IM analysis they couldnt accomplish this part, Arashi.
    Well that's what they did and that's why it's so big. Ironman seems to misunderstood several things.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tenma
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    without losing gene expression.
    According to IM analysis they couldnt accomplish this part, Arashi.

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    Also you overcomplicate things. What tsuji did is take 2 types of stem cells. Epithelial and mesenchymal. Those last were extracted from human dp. Mesenchymal = dp cells (or the other way around actually. Dp = subtype mesenchymal). That's the only part they used from the human dp.

    So again the next step is to repeat what tsuji did only this time not with dp cells extracted from human dp, but with cultured ones

    Leave a comment:


  • Arashi
    replied
    You misunderstood some things Ironman. Tsuji lab wanted to show that it is possible to bio engineer human hair grafts producing human hair. They just took existing cells and hair grew. Those Chinese wanted to prove it's possible to culture dp cells without losing gene expression. They were the first in the world to do that. The next step would be to repeat Tsuji's experiment but this time with cultured cells.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Originally posted by Tenma

    In a nutshell, replication of DP cells isnt the biggest issue right know. Its almost all about retaining the genetic instructions of the original cells.
    Basically - correct. More specific "retaining the genetic instructions of the cells' NICHE - namely, the cells' natural environment.

    The Chinese scientists mentioned in their paper that they used hair germinal matrix cells and the DP spheres; simply to examine the hair-inducing ability of their by them seperate produced DP spheres.

    Hair germinal matrix cells?
    I used the following pic from this website ...

    ... for further explanations:

    *FULL SIZE* http://www.sciencellonline.com/site/...man/2410_3.jpg

    Besides NOT using the proper material for the production of fully functional hair follicles (scientists from the Tsuji-Lab used several COMPLETE/INTACT dermal papillae -meaning including the proper "pilot"- plus real hair follicles (stem)cells derived from the bulge area of hair follicles), as already mentioned, the Chinese scientists just used artificial DPs (meaning, the genetically proper "pilot" is missing - what is not so by using natural INTACT DPs) plus hair germinal matrix cells - also without their genetically proper "pilot"; which you can see in the pic as the green stuff (fibronectin = genetically proper "pilot" who instruct, in this case, matrix cells (= blue dots in the pic above).

    So again, you can replicate/multiply cells (for example the blue labeled dots in the pic above) as much as you want and you can inject them into (bald) skin as much as you want - you will not get what you want without the extremely difficult to reproduce green stuff: the (stem)cells natural "niche". THIS stuff instructs cells what to do, how often they should divide, what the should build/create in general, etc etc etc. Stuff like the ACell or Matrigel, such stuff contains also instructions - but not the proper instructions; simply because they do not contain the proper DNA; their material is derived from something else; either produced on a synthetic basis or are derived e.g. from pig bladder ECM or something else). Such stuff simply CAN'T contain "proper instructions" - to simplify the terminology for this issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tenma
    replied
    Thanks, IM. Really great work man

    Didnt know until now the big "genetic gap" between adult dp cells used by tsuji lab and the ones cultured by the chinese investigators.

    So, the chinese study is just about the good replication capabilities of Matrigel rather than the "quality" of the DP cells obtained

    In a nutshell, replication of DP cells isnt the biggest issue right know. Its almost all about retaining the genetic instructions of the original cells.

    Leave a comment:


  • 534623
    replied
    Japanese Scientists (Tsuji Lab) vs. Chinese Scientists

    Originally posted by Arashi

    So I'm pretty sure he'll be negative about this too (since it's not HASCI, lol)
    That means you can find something positive within all in this thread mentioned trash science - sorry, but I cannot:

    Scientists from the Tsji-Lab
    The pic below shows what scientists from Tsuji's Lab had as source for the REARRANGEMENT of stem cells and their niches, to produce at least 1 fully functional human hair-bearing follicle after intracutaneous transplantation into the back skin of a nude mouse ...


    ... to get at least this:

    -----------------
    "Bioengineering of human hair follicle germ
    This procedure was performed with the approval of the ethics board of the Tokyo University of Science and Tokyo Memorial Clinic. Small pieces (1.0–2.0 cm2) of occipital scalp skin were obtained from 39- and 63-year-old male donors, who provided informed consent in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The scalp samples were treated with povidone-iodine and 70% ethanol for 10 s, twice successively.

    - The hair follicles in the anagen phase were then dissected at the upper end of the hair bulb, using a surgical knife.

    - The intact DPs and bulge-derived epithelial cells were isolated as described above.
    - The bioengineered hair follicles were then reconstituted using human intact DPs and the bulge region-derived epithelial cells, by using the organ germ method7.
    At 21 days after transplantation with the inter-epithelial tissue-connecting plastic device, the growth of pigmented hair shafts was observed underneath the epithelium of the host skin. The hair shafts were recovered by cutting into the host epithelium."

    -----------------

    So 1 ingrown hair (see their pic above or within their paper), but at least 1 fully functional hair-bearing follicle.

    Chinese scientists

    The pic below shows what the Chinese scientists had as source ...


    ... to produce this:
    Originally posted by Desmond84
    [...]
    We are the first to show that passage 3 human hair germinal matrix cells differentiate into hair-like fiber in the presence of human DP spheroids.

    These results suggest that three-dimensional Matrigel culture technique is an ideal culture model for forming DP spheroids and that sphere formation partially models the intact DP, resulting in hair induction, even by high passage DP cells.

    http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs....TEA.2013.0547
    ... a "hair-like fiber".

    So the question remains why the scientists from the Tsuji-Lab could, at least, produce 1 normal fully functional hair-bearing follicle and the Chinese scientists just a "hair-like fiber"?
    It has something to do with the pics with circles and numbers I posted above; the source the Tsuji-Lab scientists used contained, at least partially, the proper instructions for the proper "rearrangement" of stem cells and their niches - what finally resulted in a fully functional hair follicle. Sorry, but with the given and sufficient "data" (=genetics) you can see in the 1st pic, YOU know also which numbers should be there in the empty circles b/d/f and h. - and the source they used "knew" this too.

    The Chinese scientists "failed" insofar (it wasn't their intention to produce with this approach fully functional hair follicles) and produced just "hair-like fibers", because their souce lacked the proper instructions (what the hell should I build/create?) - see circles pic #2: With the given instructions, as you can see them in the 2nd pic, the souce could produce either nothing or something else.

    In simple words, the more you add "proper instructions" into the mix, the better a given souce knows what exactly it should create - even if they got just parts of instructions. To replicate/multiply THE "proper instructions" is still THE challenge for scientists; today, it's easy to replicate/multiply cells, but very difficult to replicate -let's say - the "pilot", who instructs all the different cells. The Tsuji-Lab scientists added at at least essential and natural "pilots" into the mix; but that means also that no "hair multiplication" took place, because they didn't and couldn't multiply the "pilots" - they just added them from a certain (limited) source.

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    ----

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by clarence
    Geez, they're both private forums and access is restricted for me. What do I do? I believe I have some account at both *** and HS, but don't remember if PM is available at either site?
    PM is possible on ***, I'm there as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    Reach out to me via SAGA or PHG
    Geez, they're both private forums and access is restricted for me. What do I do? I believe I have some account at both *** and HS, but don't remember if PM is available at either site?

    Leave a comment:


  • hellouser
    replied
    Originally posted by clarence
    Yah I know, but do consider what I said about Spencer. I would try to contact him myself, if I considered myself as knowledgeable as ie. you or Arashi. Arashi is not so confident about regeneration with concern to Dr. Wesley though. I also have seen your pics, Hellrouser. Some guys are interested in having grafts placed over the entire space on the top, but I think you would potentially benefit from a HT by placing most of the grafts on the front, and worry less about the space behind the hairline, before new treatment options become available. You would at least look "normal" for the rest of your life, even if the thinning will continue. I on the other hand will be looking at a huge gap between transplanted grafts and my natural hairline, if I continue receding, even if I haven't lost alot of hair. But thank god I'm already 30 years old so I know quite well where I'm heading!

    Hellrouser can I have some contact information or can I contact you privately throught the *** forum? I am looking to take one for the team concerning a certain "controversial" treatment.
    Reach out to me via SAGA or PHG

    Leave a comment:


  • Tenma
    replied
    Originally posted by Arashi
    Boldy and Desmond are by far the 2 most knowledgeable persons on this forum. Ironman comes nowhere near them and he's totally biased: everything else than HASCI is sh*t in his eyes and he's been wrong about HASCI in the first place. So I'm pretty sure he'll be negative about this too (since it's not HASCI, lol)
    I remember Ironman detailed and very well articulated explanation of why ari was going to fail and the reactions of almost all the others knowledgable posters who attacked him.

    In the end he was right on the spot about everything regarding hair multiplication, acell, nigam, jahoda, etc etc.

    The problem with him is the fanatism with certain controversial doctor.

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    ----double post

    Leave a comment:


  • clarence
    replied
    Originally posted by hellouser
    I think Cotsarelis needs to STFU if he plans on saying '2 more years' every 5 years. At this point we have to take his words with a very small grain of salt. Either he becomes transparent or stops lying through his teeth; its disgusting.
    Yah I know, but do consider what I said about Spencer. I would try to contact him myself, if I considered myself as knowledgeable as ie. you or Arashi. Arashi is not so confident about regeneration with concern to Dr. Wesley though. I also have seen your pics, Hellrouser. Some guys are interested in having grafts placed over the entire space on the top, but I think you would potentially benefit from a HT by placing most of the grafts on the front, and worry less about the space behind the hairline, before new treatment options become available. You would at least look "normal" for the rest of your life, even if the thinning will continue. I on the other hand will be looking at a huge gap between transplanted grafts and my natural hairline, if I continue receding, even if I haven't lost alot of hair. But thank god I'm already 30 years old so I know quite well where I'm heading!

    Hellrouser can I have some contact information or can I contact you privately throught the *** forum? I am looking to take one for the team concerning a certain "controversial" treatment.

    Leave a comment:

Working...