Histogen Update from Ziering Medical

[rdawg]

actually ridiculous how this stuff could've been well into Phase III by now.

it's literally dissappeared for a year and a half

[HairBane]

double post

[HairBane]

Hi ,

I am new to the forum. been looking on stuff for a while here but never took time to register or reply.but this post is weird to me. I went to ziering medical facebook page and went to recent posts by others where people write on a Liked page this post doesn't exist. there is even a post that goes back to november, 2013 (before January,2014 ). I wonder did anybody do the same before and found it ?

Can't see it. My guess would be that Histogen and Dr. Ziering got lots of emails from forum boys asking them about that comment. It wasn't a very clear message, and made it sound like HSC was still several years away from a release - it was probably written by an employee of Ziering with the intention of promoting PRP & Acell treatment. Damage control was just deleting it.

[hgs1989]

go to ziering medical facebook page

Hi ,

I am new to the forum. been looking on stuff for a while here but never took time to register or reply.but this post is weird to me. I went to ziering medical facebook page and went to recent posts by others where people write on a Liked page this post doesn't exist. there is even a post that goes back to november, 2013 (before January,2014 ). I wonder did anybody do the same before and found it ?

[hellouser]

When he said "HT industry," he meant it would enhance HTs. Meaning its patients, not HT clinics themselves. Histogen has the potenital of diverting hair loss patients from clinics to using the product especially when its shown that it's able to successfully give back the same amount of hair that clinics do. Therefore, HT clinics will find it difficult to compete with the product.

Wrong.

I myself do NOT want to use find, minox or any experimental like RU or CB. If Histogen were to work, I'd couple it with an HT and have much better results than HT.

Both products can coexist... minox and fin do. Do you really think balding men will just go for ONE type of treatment knowing that more can be done to improve and maintain?

[garethbale]

When he said "HT industry," he meant it would enhance HTs. Meaning its patients, not HT clinics themselves. Histogen has the potenital of diverting hair loss patients from clinics to using the product especially when its shown that it's able to successfully give back the same amount of hair that clinics do. Therefore, HT clinics will find it difficult to compete with the product.

I'm pretty sure Histogen will be like a stronger version of minox. It will thicken up thinning areas but won't grow hair where there is no hair.

I think it will complement HTs...from my own perspective; I have been told I am a good HT candidate, my hair recession is slow and crown in strong. I should be straight in the HT chair but the element of doubt about what the future will bring is stopping me. I guarantee that if Histogen (or womever) release a project which can halt my hair loss, I would feel much more comfortable undergoing surgery.

[koolx]

^ Nonsense.

Spencer explained so many times why a breakthrough like Histogen's would be very positive for the hair transplant industry.

When he said "HT industry," he meant it would enhance HTs. Meaning its patients, not HT clinics themselves. Histogen has the potenital of diverting hair loss patients from clinics to using the product especially when its shown that it's able to successfully give back the same amount of hair that clinics do. Therefore, HT clinics will find it difficult to compete with the product.

[Pentarou]

For the time being, I'd say it was safer to describe Histogen dormant rather than dead.

[Breaking Bald]

...so if Histogen is basically toast, why is this thread still alive?? Did I miss something here??

Who said they were 'toast'? It's just speculation as always! We don't know what they are up too.

[greatjob!]

You bring up an interesting point and now why I am stuck on this board. If Histogen comes out and can give more hair + HT = reasonable amount of hair. Then do you go for it or if Lin from Taiwan says his cloning might be out in 2 years THEN do you wait on doing Histogen and HT or do it immediately? Since Taiwan 2 years could turn into, one more year, then one more year, then one more year and you wasted 5 years.

We have two problems we hopefully soon face. Do we do the first thing that comes out or wait for something better. Believe me, I do not want to wait one second more but also do not want to make a bad choice due to impatience.

Neither of those two treatments are coming out in two years

[greatjob!]

I hate saying this, but its very possible that the makers of Histogen got bribed by the big med companies or by the HT mafia to never release it. We're talking potentially billions of dollars in profit that can make a company rich and bankrupt others including the HT industry. With this much power and profit at stake, the chances of this happening should not be underestimated. We've seen historic imprints of proof of what happens when big business profits are threatened by a new company showing off its new product. Case in point; what the auto industry did to the Tucker car company.

Please remove your tin foil hat before you post...

[Sparky4444]

...so if Histogen is basically toast, why is this thread still alive?? Did I miss something here??

[locke999]

You bring up an interesting point and now why I am stuck on this board. If Histogen comes out and can give more hair + HT = reasonable amount of hair. Then do you go for it or if Lin from Taiwan says his cloning might be out in 2 years THEN do you wait on doing Histogen and HT or do it immediately? Since Taiwan 2 years could turn into, one more year, then one more year, then one more year and you wasted 5 years.

We have two problems we hopefully soon face. Do we do the first thing that comes out or wait for something better. Believe me, I do not want to wait one second more but also do not want to make a bad choice due to impatience.

LOL. Come on man, there is nothing to discuss at this point.

Histogen shows no sign of bringing out a product anytime soon and we don't know just how far this Taiwan study can take it or what trial.

"Don't count your chickens before they hatch."

[nasazl1]

You bring up an interesting point and now why I am stuck on this board. If Histogen comes out and can give more hair + HT = reasonable amount of hair. Then do you go for it or if Lin from Taiwan says his cloning might be out in 2 years THEN do you wait on doing Histogen and HT or do it immediately? Since Taiwan 2 years could turn into, one more year, then one more year, then one more year and you wasted 5 years.

We have two problems we hopefully soon face. Do we do the first thing that comes out or wait for something better. Believe me, I do not want to wait one second more but also do not want to make a bad choice due to impatience.

For NW4 or lower it could potentially give great density and with an HT could bring down the hairline to a socially accepted look.

I'd hop on the HT + Histogen bandwagon immediately if the two were available, but Histogen is being borderline retarded with their progress.... what the hell have they been doing over the last year to warrant such a hold up?

[hellouser]

^ Nonsense.

Spencer explained so many times why a breakthrough like Histogen's would be very positive for the hair transplant industry.

For NW4 or lower it could potentially give great density and with an HT could bring down the hairline to a socially accepted look.

I'd hop on the HT + Histogen bandwagon immediately if the two were available, but Histogen is being borderline retarded with their progress.... what the hell have they been doing over the last year to warrant such a hold up?