Histogen - Documents and Presentations

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HairBane
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 300

    #46
    Originally posted by hellouser
    'Apparently CB is an sebaceous gland inhibitor - do you think that could negatively impact neogenesis from treatments like HSC?'
    Oh right. Well I'd pose that question to Cosmo too, maybe it's not a sebaceous gland inhibitor, they did report regrowth after all.

    Comment

    • YoungOne
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 16

      #47
      Would histogen be affective in regrowing a hairline, or should it just increase density in areas where you still have hair?

      Comment

      • HairBane
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2013
        • 300

        #48
        Originally posted by YoungOne
        Would histogen be affective in regrowing a hairline, or should it just increase density in areas where you still have hair?

        Comment

        • Javert
          Member
          • Jun 2013
          • 99

          #49
          Originally posted by greatjob!
          Nothing I said was incorrect.

          Histogen is not going to effect the hair follicles susceptibility to DHT. True as far as anyone knows.

          You could possibly maybe in theory use maintenance treatments to continue to induce growth to negate the effects of DHT. Maybe, but there is no proof of this and no proof that the treatment is compoundable or will continue to stimulate growth at the same rate.



          Next time you should lead with this: silence or maybe STFU



          I never said you were incorrect. You just stated the obvious. And later answered a question saying one effect may out weigh the other. I was making a suggestion to lead with what I believe is a more complete answer. It wasn't my intention to seem malicious if that's how it came across.

          By the way you said lead with silence OR stfu.. aren't they same thing? That's like saying "either shut up or be quiet".

          Comment

          • greatjob!
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2011
            • 909

            #50
            Originally posted by Javert

            I never said you were incorrect. You just stated the obvious. And later answered a question saying one effect may out weigh the other. I was making a suggestion to lead with what I believe is a more complete answer. It wasn't my intention to seem malicious if that's how it came across.
            I didn't state the obvious I answered a question from a poster who thought HSC would make your follicles resistant to DHT, go back and read. You came off as a condescending d*ckhole, if that wasn't your intention then ok. But then you did it again:

            Originally posted by Javert
            By the way you said lead with silence OR stfu.. aren't they same thing? That's like saying "either shut up or be quiet"
            And no its the difference between saying be quite or shut the f*ck up (STFU)

            Comment

            • Javert
              Member
              • Jun 2013
              • 99

              #51
              Originally posted by greatjob!
              I didn't state the obvious I answered a question from a poster who thought HSC would make your follicles resistant to DHT, go back and read. You came off as a condescending d*ckhole, if that wasn't your intention then ok. But then you did it again:



              And no its the difference between saying be quite or shut the f*ck up (STFU)
              Telling someone to either be silent OR shut up is redundant. Both phrases carry the same meaning. You answered the question, let it go.

              Comment

              • Javert
                Member
                • Jun 2013
                • 99

                #52
                Originally posted by greatjob!
                I didn't state the obvious I answered a question from a poster who thought HSC would make your follicles resistant to DHT, go back and read. You came off as a condescending d*ckhole, if that wasn't your intention then ok. But then you did it again:



                And no its the difference between saying be quite or shut the f*ck up (STFU)
                I read it just fine. We just interpreted each other's response differently. No worries mate. It's difficult to convey tone via message boards. Whatever the case I hope that it proves to counteract the effects of DHT.

                Comment

                Working...