Yup. Next to that photo stating +61%, you'll see the number of the patient (s1016) who got those results.
Obviously it's a patient with very thin recpient, so if you only have a few hairs, the higher the increase in percentage will be of course. Hence I think an absolute number would be way more interesting to see than a percentage
-
-
Histogen 2013 MESA Presentation
What i noticed that:
1- Histogen Phase I/II Clinical Trial did not show photos, just detailed statistics (Male Patients)
2- Dr. Craig Ziering US Physician-sponsored Trial – showed photos, with no detailed statistics (Female patients)
what i don't get:
Phase I/II Clinical Trial – 56 Subjects
PRIMARY SAFETY 12 weeks
• Clinical chemistry showed no indication of toxicity or blood/urine abnormalities
PRIMARY EFFICACY 12 weeks
• 10.45% increase in mean total hair count over baseline p=0.0013
• 19.5% increase in mean terminal hair count over baseline p=0.0135
• 86% responder rate
WTF with 10.45% and 19.4% increase? isn't that supposed to be 60% ?
and no, don't answer that. the only one who can explain that is Dr gail. because you will give me answers based on 7th grade math class.
Enjoy..
Leave a comment: