Did you seriously stopped so low as to use an insulting gif? Are your arguments not enought?
So what I understand is that, you don't believe the study could show results in 3 months? Then you are admitting you think the study is bogus
If the study claimed it took them 6 months to show results, I would advice everyone to do it as it is described by study. But the study is very clear, 3 months is enough, and if nothing shows up in 3 months, then we either need to question the legitimacy of the study, or the way we are perform it it
But people are getting defensive and don't want to question either one of those possibilities
Instead of fighting like children, let's argue and try to understand this
Why are there no results yet? Things are not going well
My position is that most of us are doing exactly what the study says, at least the ones that are using 1.5mm needles until slight hemorrhage occurs.
I don't trust the study completely now, since people are starting to claim the pictures labeled as 12-week results are said to be 1 year results
So what I understand is that, you don't believe the study could show results in 3 months? Then you are admitting you think the study is bogus
If the study claimed it took them 6 months to show results, I would advice everyone to do it as it is described by study. But the study is very clear, 3 months is enough, and if nothing shows up in 3 months, then we either need to question the legitimacy of the study, or the way we are perform it it
But people are getting defensive and don't want to question either one of those possibilities
Instead of fighting like children, let's argue and try to understand this
Why are there no results yet? Things are not going well
My position is that most of us are doing exactly what the study says, at least the ones that are using 1.5mm needles until slight hemorrhage occurs.
I don't trust the study completely now, since people are starting to claim the pictures labeled as 12-week results are said to be 1 year results
Comment