I recommend mechanical approach for now and fda drugs, although, they also don't come without risck, but we know what to expect, since trials are preformed.
Do you have a good donor left?if so stop waiting
The best.
are you still in contact with dr. Nigams? It seems he's stopping to post from sometime, beside all this virtual chatting upon ethical and safety i don't know if he'still to pursuing invitro on beardhair DP cells and 3d aggregation. Somewhere in the thread it was talking about 3-6 months to see some results, that's why i think, people are here arguing ferociously: they don't want to do an HT if something viable will may come from Nigams the next year
are you still in contact with dr. Nigams? It seems he's stopping to post from sometime, beside all this virtual chatting upon ethical and safety i don't know if he'still to pursuing invitro on beardhair DP cells and 3d aggregation. Somewhere in the thread it was talking about 3-6 months to see some results, that's why i think, people are here arguing ferociously: they don't want to do an HT if something viable will may come from Nigams the next year
Nigam stop to post because of the attack he got.. wuthout valuable reason.. He will come back after the result. Need to wait 6 months from now, and YES you should wait before make a HT as you will maybe have the choice to it in europe with mwamba.
Nigam stop to post because of the attack he got.. wuthout valuable reason.. He will come back after the result. Need to wait 6 months from now, and YES you should wait before make a HT as you will maybe have the choice to it in europe with mwamba.
Nigam stop to post because of the attack he got.. wuthout valuable reason.. He will come back after the result. Need to wait 6 months from now, and YES you should wait before make a HT as you will maybe have the choice to it in europe with mwamba.
Iron Man was rude to him and attacked him unnecessarily.
Other than that, people questioned his practices and photos but no one attacked him. I hope he doesn't feel that he was attacked, we just want to scrutinise his methods.
Iron Man was rude to him and attacked him unnecessarily.
Other than that, people questioned his practices and photos but no one attacked him. I hope he doesn't feel that he was attacked, we just want to scrutinise his methods.
I hope he continues to post.
He deserves every bit of CONSTRUCTIVE criticism. Its completely warranted and fair. However Ironman's insults had nothing to do with either side of the argument.
TBH I am completely lost with this at the moment......The main thing that is keeping me interested is the fact Dr Mwamba has apparently taken an interest.
Could sum1 give a very brief description of Dr Nigam's method(s) and what he is expecting to achieve.........is whatever he has claimed he can do......going to help a NW6?
TBH I am completely lost with this at the moment......The main thing that is keeping me interested is the fact Dr Mwamba has apparently taken an interest.
Could sum1 give a very brief description of Dr Nigam's method(s) and what he is expecting to achieve.........is whatever he has claimed he can do......going to help a NW6?
He claims unlimited donor, so, even you would be able to go to nw2 if you wanted to sausage....based on what he claims..it is yet to be determined if his claims are legit
He claims unlimited donor, so, even you would be able to go to nw2 if you wanted to sausage....based on what he claims..it is yet to be determined if his claims are legit
Have to say if his claims were true that would be amazing.
I could completely fill in my hairline and have plenty left over for future work
Did you already take a close look at the photo's ? There are several factors that are going to make this very difficult to analyse in my opinion:
1) No birthmark/tattoo it seems. Not sure how Nigams is even going to locate the exact position again ?
2) They shaved a huge part after the pre-op picture (the post-op strip is both much thicker and longer, so we don't have a pre-op for quite a lot of grafts)
3) Pre-op resolution is still quite low. Probably just good enough but it's going to be difficult
4) Grafts were implanted back into donor right ? This is going to make it even harder to see what's what.
Maybe I'm missing something but this is going to be an extremely difficult analysis in my opinion. And the fact that we don't have a pre-op for about half of the donor is going to make it next to impossible. And I'm not even talking about recipient, that's even more difficult I think I remember they implanted alot INTO his hairline ...
Really, maybe I'm overreacting but how are we supposed to do an analysis if we don't have half of the donor as pre-op ? And the recipient always bothered me a lot as well. It's just going to be extremely difficult to monitor since a lot was implanted into the hairline.
What Nigams needs to do is get a NW7 to his clinic and give him 15k grafts.
Did you already take a close look at the photo's ? There are several factors that are going to make this very difficult to analyse in my opinion:
1) No birthmark/tattoo it seems. Not sure how Nigams is even going to locate the exact position again ?
2) They shaved a huge part after the pre-op picture (the post-op strip is both much thicker and longer, so we don't have a pre-op for quite a lot of grafts)
3) Pre-op resolution is still quite low. Probably just good enough but it's going to be difficult
4) Grafts were implanted back into donor right ? This is going to make it even harder to see what's what.
Maybe I'm missing something but this is going to be an extremely difficult analysis in my opinion. And the fact that we don't have a pre-op for about half of the donor is going to make it next to impossible. And I'm not even talking about recipient, that's even more difficult I think I remember they implanted alot INTO his hairline ...
Yea I had a brief look. The photos are almost useless unfortunately.
I would like to know how many grafts were implanted back in the donor. Do you have this info?
Yea I had a brief look. The photos are almost useless unfortunately.
Well for quite a few grafts we can see if they're single or doubles in the pre-op photo. The photo is not of stellar quality but it might just be enough. But the fact that they shaved half of the donor AFTER the pre-op picture makes the whole thing rather useless in my opinion. That plus that we don't know where he implanted grafts back. The post-op pics are a huge mess. Not sure what's donor and what's recipient.
I would like to know how many grafts were implanted back in the donor. Do you have this info?
I'm quite sure he posted this somewhere but no I don't have this at hand.
Comment