ar50 ... probably works ... but we're all a little skeptical because they deceived us many times ... I personally believe Dr. Nigam and I have seen several patients with excellent results, but I'll wait for more evidence. He is not using FUE or FUT ... too complicated to explain ... a lot more efficient than traditional hair transplant
Dr Nigam, my own experience
Collapse
X
-
ok but thats that method dr gho uses. I once contacted a bunch of HT doctors in Holland. and they all rejected Dr Gho's method. One of them even said: Its a very expensive FUE. But if the follicle is cut in half, than that hair would be thinner dan normal i guess because 1 devided in 2 is 0,5? or am i missing something?Comment
-
each part of the hair autoheals-autocompletes in size and everything. like a lizards tail somwhowok but thats that method dr gho uses. I once contacted a bunch of HT doctors in Holland. and they all rejected Dr Gho's method. One of them even said: Its a very expensive FUE. But if the follicle is cut in half, than that hair would be thinner dan normal i guess because 1 devided in 2 is 0,5? or am i missing something?Comment
-
I'm interested in Dr Nigams but where are the photos???
I checked out his website and the before and afters look negligible in difference…
If he is doing the equivalent of 5000 grafts surely he should have some examples of pretty dramatic transformations.Comment
-
-
If Nigam is really legit we should see NW7 to NW 2/3 transformations by late 2014.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
There are few pics on my album at tbt.will update with more photos on the tbt album this week.
Since i appointed professional photographer in jan/feb2013,
i will be posting the pics of patients who started doubling and hm from feb 2013.
I started doing doubling since last 8/9 months, starting with few grafts and gradually increasing to higher graft numbers,we need to follow the cases over a period of next 6 months..which are posted already on forums and will be posted shortly on website.
Comment
-
Dr Nigam, I think that if you're using patients that have a poor donor, then you will not need to show close up, micro photos of the follicles, but rather macro photos will suffice. If the treatment works, the result will be easily noted in a larger, macro photo of the patient's head. Just IMO!
Keep up the good work sir.Comment
-
Comment