DR NIGAM, re: Tom Vercetti, the French Moderator

[clandestine]

^Polite way of saying: it's his snarky *****ing attitude.

[garethbale]

yeah he might know a bit about hair loss but he is a giant bell!

also him criticising Dr Nigam's background and expertise in being from India was bang out of order

[hellouser]

yeah he might know a bit about hair loss but he is a giant bell!

also him criticising Dr Nigam's background and expertise in being from India was bang out of order

It's not the first time he's taken a low-blow swipe at Dr. Nigam.

[The Alchemist]

What a ridiculous comment pal, especially from you.

I want Nigam to succeed it's as simple as that, so calling me a troll is a complete and utter shambles of a joke.

I also want to see before and after pictures showing a 50 graft area, I don't believe that is too much to ask for considering the claims that are being made.

oppenheimer82: I have no idea who you are, but if you would have read my posts, you'll see I'm always polite and that includes to Dr Nigam.

Tom: Of course I have seen Hairsite, I think you have completely missed the point.

Back on topic.... So do we know how many hairs (not grafts) have been extracted in our sample area? We need a photo showing those hairs before extraction and of course afterwards.

If Dr Nigam says he doesn't have a photo showing a large amount of grafts, circled and numbered pre op, then it's subject closed for this particular case in terms of replicating the results of something like this:
Dr MOUSSEIGNE Now that is what is needed here. Tom take a look at that link.

Dr Nigam can do this type of analysis with one of his next patients perhaps and document in the same was as Dr MOUSSEIGNE (because frankly that is one of the best I've seen, up there with JJJJrS and IM's analysis), I'm not expecting that he has done it for this particular case, but if he has then fantastic.

So layoff and stop getting your knickers in a twist.

...all the photos he has were up on hairsite, which he already stated. And He's putting the new photos up as he gets them. They can't be put up any faster than he gets them - understand? He's explained it numerous times...so shut your yap.

[Pentarou]

IM knows very well that if nigams succeeds with his DP culture method (unlimited new follicles), people will be cured..


conflict of interest.

Trufax.

[gc83uk]

...all the photos he has were up on hairsite, which he already stated. And He's putting the new photos up as he gets them. They can't be put up any faster than he gets them - understand? He's explained it numerous times...so shut your yap.

Shut your yap? lol you must be at least over 50.

If you had read hairsite you would have seen I have commented over there on the very subject and you'll also have noticed he is struggling to match the two photos he originally analysed. You'll also notice he is sending me the originals via email.

When did I ask him to put them up faster that he gets them?

Exactly!

[Arashi]

Woahhh, why not? I thought you wanted to share everything!

Dr Nigam, it's very important that YOU upload your photo of Toms Donor before Tom uploads anything! We need to see a photo of at least 50 grafts before extraction and of course another photo immediately after the extractions showing these same grafts, remember it needs to be at least 50, just like I did with Gho. And because your reimplanting "something" back in the donor, then we'll need the third photo right after the implanting of donor of the same group of grafts of course.

Then a few days weeks later we ask Tom to upload his photos to compare with your work. This is how you document it.

Anything else is just not going to work IMO. Anybody want to tell me I'm wrong here?

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here, Gaz. We have good pre-op photo's of the donor, including macro photo's. Hence it's just going to be a matter of comparing this photo to new post-op macro photo's of the donor and we can exactly see how many hairs there are left. Same for recipient.

[534623]

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here, Gaz.

Seems Gaz is using the same language like Kristel ... lol

[Arashi]

Seems Gaz is using the same language like Kristel ... lol

Hihi. Now that's funny, man !

[gc83uk]

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here, Gaz. We have good pre-op photo's of the donor, including macro photo's. Hence it's just going to be a matter of comparing this photo to new post-op macro photo's of the donor and we can exactly see how many hairs there are left. Same for recipient.

Can you do me a favour mate if you don't mind? I've gone round in cirlces with this, can you link me the macro before photo? There is about 6 thread on HS and at least 2 over here on Nigam.

Is there a comparable pic too? I noticed Dr Nigam said on HS that he couldn't match up his after photo with the before photo, so I take it we have to wait for a new after photo?

Is there also a pic AFTER the bisected parts have been implanted into the donor immediately after surgery?

[Arashi]

Can you do me a favour mate if you don't mind? I've gone round in cirlces with this, can you link me the macro before photo? There is about 6 thread on HS and at least 2 over here on Nigam.

Is there a comparable pic too? I noticed Dr Nigam said on HS that he couldn't match up his after photo with the before photo, so I take it we have to wait for a new after photo?

Is there also a pic AFTER the bisected parts have been implanted into the donor immediately after surgery?

Hmmm can't find the photo's myself anymore neither. I think dr Nigams changed one of his posts, cause they were there. The first post of this thread: http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthread.php?t=12707 got the photo's but they're only thumbnails.

@Dr Nigams can you maybe repost the links to the full sized pictures ? Thanks !

[gc83uk]

Hmmm can't find the photo's myself anymore neither. I think dr Nigams changed one of his posts, cause they were there. The first post of this thread: http://www.baldtruthtalk.com/showthread.php?t=12707 got the photo's but they're only thumbnails.

@Dr Nigams can you maybe repost the links to the full sized pictures ? Thanks !

Scratch that mate, just checked my inbox and Nigam has sent them over to me by email. Let me know if you want them and I'll email them over to you. I think it'll be pretty interesting case!

[Arashi]

Scratch that mate, just checked my inbox and Nigam has sent them over to me by email. Let me know if you want them and I'll email them over to you. I think it'll be pretty interesting case!

Would be great if you could add them to your dropbox. Thx !

[The Alchemist]

Shut your yap? lol you must be at least over 50.

If you had read hairsite you would have seen I have commented over there on the very subject and you'll also have noticed he is struggling to match the two photos he originally analysed. You'll also notice he is sending me the originals via email.

When did I ask him to put them up faster that he gets them?

Exactly!

Good come back, kid. Treat the Dr with some decency, he's on here trying to help and you were acting rude and making demands of him as if he owes you something...which he certainly doesn't.

[didi]

seriously guys, show some respect for this Dr, we should be grateful to have him here willing to answer questions and present cases, do free tests

Gaz, since you are so harsh and critical type of person why don't you send couple of emails to hasci and tell them how you really feel about them screwing 2 tests in a month time..hasci seem quite comfortable with keeping people in dark, whereas nigam is quite the opposite, he is doing tests for us, send him anybody he wont turn him down bc his hair is too thick and cant do 3 hair grafts, etc..


they could learn a lot from dr nigam