How does Dr. Wesley's Scarless Pilofocus work?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Artista
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 2070

    I agree with Didi ,
    "It would be nice to hear from Dr Wesley himself, he could upload presentation on his website or TBT."

    The PowerPoint discussion that I had with Dr Wesley was held in confidence regarding certain aspects of his technique.
    Just as Spencer Kobren was also held in confidence.
    It is a matter of respect Arashi, if I could speak openly I would.

    Comment

    • didi
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 1360

      "He's told the whole world about his technique now, but you're not supposed to share anything at all"



      His master didnt give him green light to talk but master told the whole world...

      Comment

      • sausage
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 1063

        I thought everything was being revealed this month.......isn't that what we have been waiting months for........complete joke.

        Comment

        • Delphi
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2009
          • 517

          You people are ridiculous. The conference is still going on. Do you really think they are rushing to release this information to a bunch of crybabies on a hair loss forum. We'll all find out soon enough. Either way, its not going to change any of our lives today, so what's the rush?

          Comment

          • Arashi
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2012
            • 3888

            Originally posted by Delphi
            You people are ridiculous. The conference is still going on. Do you really think they are rushing to release this information to a bunch of crybabies on a hair loss forum. We'll all find out soon enough. Either way, its not going to change any of our lives today, so what's the rush?
            Hehe. If you don't care about info regarding the (near) future in terms of hair loss solutions, then why participate in this section of the forum ?

            Dr Wesley's presentation ended yesterday morning. Of course we're all dying for information here, even though I expect pretty much nothing in terms of regrowth, it will still be interesting to hear more about his technique.

            Comment

            • Delphi
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2009
              • 517

              Originally posted by Arashi
              Hehe. If you don't care about info regarding the (near) future in terms of hair loss solutions, then why participate in this section of the forum ?

              Dr Wesley's presentation ended yesterday morning. Of course we're all dying for information here, even though I expect pretty much nothing in terms of regrowth, it will still be interesting to hear more about his technique.
              We're all interested, but come on, we'll get the information when we get it.

              Comment

              • crafter
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2013
                • 239

                WELL I HAVE TWEETED EVERY SURGEON ON TWITTER ATTENDING THE MEETING and none have replied with info about Dr Wesley's talk

                Comment

                • Arashi
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 3888

                  Originally posted by Delphi
                  We're all interested, but come on, we'll get the information when we get it.
                  It all is just one big wet fart. All this tension build up, "24 october Dr Wesley is going to tell the world about his revolutionary technique" we've heard that for months. And then that date passes and ..... nothing. Just silence.

                  Comment

                  • Number47
                    Junior Member
                    • Oct 2013
                    • 29

                    For me best remedy for the waiting is talking and assuming about it again lol.

                    Lets check the patent again and the pictures and we can dream or despair

                    A surgical apparatus for hair removal surgery includes an extraction module, a visualization component and a bridging component. The extraction module includes independently controllable coring and clipping devices. The visualization component acts to align a target hair follicle with the extraction module. The extraction module also includes at least one independently controllable suction port. The instrument also includes a dissection module having a tissue separating device.



                    For me the things that comes to my mind is that its like liposuction for follicles or FUE from beneath.

                    Basically the way i see it Carlos took the principles of suction something like the Neograft machine and used its benefits vice versa! The supposed benefit of the Neograft machine is to use its blades to cut around the follicle and then use suction to remove the follicle without the blades reaching the root where manual FUE supposedly can damage it during the extraction. So basically suction does the rest after cutting the dermis. The obvious drawback is that it still has FUE dot scarring and many surgeons think that suction can damage the follicle while its being pulled

                    Wesley on the other hand he used the suction principle to suck the hair from underneath ,(there seems to still be something underneath from the way i read the patent that uses blades to isolate and cut around the root of the follicle to allow the force of suction to do the rest) and then uses suction to be able to take them without having to reach the dermis so the superficial scar(white dot) is avoided and the graft ends up in his collection device out of our head. The suction in this case has an easier job to do cause it sucks from the root and the hair just slip through its point of exit back to our head and in his tube and then collector device.

                    What i dont understand and maybe its because i am reading things wrong from the patent is how you precise the blades from underneath to cut around the follicle root so that suction can do its job? Sounds like blind harvesting at its best.

                    Comment

                    • Kiwi
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 1087

                      Originally posted by Number47
                      For me best remedy for the waiting is talking and assuming about it again lol.

                      Lets check the patent again and the pictures and we can dream or despair

                      A surgical apparatus for hair removal surgery includes an extraction module, a visualization component and a bridging component. The extraction module includes independently controllable coring and clipping devices. The visualization component acts to align a target hair follicle with the extraction module. The extraction module also includes at least one independently controllable suction port. The instrument also includes a dissection module having a tissue separating device.



                      For me the things that comes to my mind is that its like liposuction for follicles or FUE from beneath.

                      Basically the way i see it Carlos took the principles of suction something like the Neograft machine and used its benefits vice versa! The supposed benefit of the Neograft machine is to use its blades to cut around the follicle and then use suction to remove the follicle without the blades reaching the root where manual FUE supposedly can damage it during the extraction. So basically suction does the rest after cutting the dermis. The obvious drawback is that it still has FUE dot scarring and many surgeons think that suction can damage the follicle while its being pulled

                      Wesley on the other hand he used the suction principle to suck the hair from underneath ,(there seems to still be something underneath from the way i read the patent that uses blades to isolate and cut around the root of the follicle to allow the force of suction to do the rest) and then uses suction to be able to take them without having to reach the dermis so the superficial scar(white dot) is avoided and the graft ends up in his collection device out of our head. The suction in this case has an easier job to do cause it sucks from the root and the hair just slip through its point of exit back to our head and in his tube and then collector device.

                      What i dont understand and maybe its because i am reading things wrong from the patent is how you precise the blades from underneath to cut around the follicle root so that suction can do its job? Sounds like blind harvesting at its best.
                      They use MRI scanning technology. Apparently.

                      Comment

                      • Arashi
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 3888

                        I think if this was something really interesting, we would have heard something by now ...

                        Comment

                        • fred970
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 922

                          +1 Arashi. I think this was just an other excuse to push for people to delay a classic FUE. "Wait for pilofocus!", "wait for hair cloning!"...

                          Comment

                          • Javert
                            Member
                            • Jun 2013
                            • 99

                            Be patient guys! Maybe something will leak soon?

                            Comment

                            • 67mph
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 216

                              Stiiiill waaaaaaaaiting...

                              Comment

                              • hellouser
                                Senior Member
                                • May 2012
                                • 4419

                                Pilofocus.com should have been updated by now with new relevant information.

                                Comment

                                Working...