Hair loss Is preventable and reversible. A must Read!

[2020]

Because castration removes the testicles being the primary site of testosterone when your prostrate adds seaman it is converting t to dht, dht is the main cause of hair loss and when removing the testicles you remove the t do it can't be converted to dht the main coss of mpb. Women's testosterone goes up as they get older and in their brains and muscles they convert dht they in rare cases produce enough dht cause hair loss. Women also lose hair primarily after birthing a boy because during male genitalia formation there is a large amount of dht production. Any one arguing these facts knows nothing on the topic

what's your point? How does that relate to your crazy theory where "circulation" causes hair loss? Obviously it's not a problem, so why don't you just move on... unless you're making money off of this

[beatinghairloss]

what's your point? How does that relate to your crazy theory where "circulation" causes hair loss? Obviously it's not a problem, so why don't you just move on... unless you're making money off of this

I was just answering the persons question. Some day there will be an actual full comprehensive research done on blood flow and hair loss and mark my words I will come one here and say "I told you so"

[2020]

I was just answering the persons question. Some day there will be an actual full comprehensive research done on blood flow and hair loss and mark my words I will come one here and say "I told you so"

even though I already proved your theory wrong, WHAT WOULD IT TAKE to convince you that bloodflow is not a problem?

[beatinghairloss]

even though I already proved your theory wrong, WHAT WOULD IT TAKE to convince you that bloodflow is not a problem?

Any scientifically significant study would do.

[2020]

Any scientifically significant study would do.

I already gave you one:

two follicles were taken out of a subject - one from donor area, and one from MPB area.

Both of those follicles were implanted on subjects arm.
Follicle from MPB area shrunk, while follicle from donor area grew just fine.

^ doesn't that prove that LOCATION doesn't matter and the problem is actually inside individual follicles that tells them to shrink???

[greatjob!]

so beatinghairloss you said you have cured your hairloss, correct? So lets see some pics. You can prove to everyone here that your crackpot theory works by posting before and after photos proving you have cured baldness. So lets see it

[gutted]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/06/100617120716.htm

[2020]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0617120716.htm

what is this?

[Davey Jones]

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0617120716.htm

I'm gonna assume the bacteria they're talking about is candida. The autoimmune response is associated with (or more accurately, it is) chronic, systemic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is bad, and I go pretty far out of my way to counter that, including measures to restrict the overdevelopment of candida.

I'm pretty unconvinced that inflammation has much to do with balding. Or, even if it is, that we can restrict it enough to have an effect on balding. I'd like to think that if we could, I would have noticed something by now. Buuuuut, maybe not.

[beatinghairloss]

I already gave you one:

two follicles were taken out of a subject - one from donor area, and one from MPB area.

Both of those follicles were implanted on subjects arm.
Follicle from MPB area shrunk, while follicle from donor area grew just fine.

^ doesn't that prove that LOCATION doesn't matter and the problem is actually inside individual follicles that tells them to shrink???

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance

[25 going on 65]

This thread is just a bad joke at this point.

Occam's Razor. Use it.

[2020]

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance

what makes you think such experiment won't work on 1000 people?

[beatinghairloss]

what makes you think such experiment won't work on 1000 people?

My friend it is not about thinking as much as it is assuming. You assume hair loss is hair per hair genetic predisposition but if this where true variation would cause this hair loss to be scatterd to the entire body. Even if it was scatterd across the entire head it would be more believable. Unfortunately you assume this fact based on one test one person this is terrible scientific judgment. You should demand more. The area men experience balding has localized similarities that are way past mere coincidence. The galea is the key but more importantly it's blood flow via unintentional looseness and movement of the scalp. Genetic is merely the shape of your head and muscles in the head

[2020]

My friend it is not about thinking as much as it is assuming. You assume hair loss is hair per hair genetic predisposition but if this where true variation would cause this hair loss to be scatterd to the entire body.

follicles on your body are not programmed in such way.

Even if it was scatterd across the entire head it would be more believable.

it's called diffuse thinning

Unfortunately you assume this fact based on one test one person this is terrible scientific judgment. You should demand more.

so they just got extremely lucky with that person huh? What makes you think they couldn't repeat that experiment with the same results on a thousand people?

The area men experience balding has localized similarities that are way past mere coincidence. The galea is the key but more importantly it's blood flow via unintentional looseness and movement of the scalp. Genetic is merely the shape of your head and muscles in the head

BUT HAIR TRANSPLANTS WORK! I found you a patient whose hair persisted on a MPB area with "poor circulation" for 30 years!!! Explain that

[2020]

During the past few decades, several hypotheses concerning the etiology of male pattern baldness (MPB) have been presented. In 1933, Wadel reported findings of decreased motility of the scalp. He was convinced that this decrease was due to the fact that in MPB patients the scalp is both frontally and sagittally too short, and thus it has to be stretched like a too-small cap to cover the relatively too-big skull. For hair nutrition and rooting this persisting tension creates unbearable conditions, leading to gradual loss of hair. In 1935 he wrote that MPB is the end result of the tension atrophy of the scalp covering the galea aponeurotica. This atrophy is caused by a disproportion between the skull bone and the galea aponeurotica, due to an isolated growth of the skull bone to which the tendon-like structure of the galea is not able to adapt. He reported excellent results in the treatment of MPB with 'loosening' massage to the scalp.

"In 1941, Kessler started experimental work with frontal galeotomies in order to reduce the supposed increased tension of the galea aponeurotica. In 1961 he reported a success rate of 87% with this treatment of MPB. At that time this operation was popular in Europe. In 1963, Ponten reported that after frontal galeotomy he could not find any objective improvement in his 56 patients and he still holds this view concerning this operation (personal communication, 1976).

"The present author has seen several patients who have undergone frontal galeotomy and later developed an advanced degree of MPB. The popularity of this operation has waned."

"In the receding hairline and in the graft taken from it the loss of hairs remains synchronous even though the latter is transplanted to a remote skin area. In MPB the 'balding clock' in the follicle or in its very close surrounding keeps time even when the follicle is transplanted to the skin of the forearm. The presence or absence of the galea aponeurotica does not influence the balding process in MPB. Nor does the supposed increased tension of the scalp or its muscles or a diminished vascular supply to the scalp have an effect on balding. Neither do any other factors localized to the head cause balding. The cause seems to lie in the follicle itself or its very close surrounding. The graft taken from the denuded area did not grow new hairs, and so the MPB process of the hair follicle is not reversed by a change in its location on the human body.

are we done now?