I plan on having GHO transplants and the Scarless FUE to densify the hairline region as a second procedure.. What do you all think?
whats the problem with Gho??
Collapse
X
-
-
I think that if you even have as little as 10% confidence in Dr Nigams, you should wait and see how Tom's hair develops. If you don't have any confidence in him, yeah Gho is the way to go for sure (if you have the money). Just keep in mind that currently the regrowth percentage is still very much topic of debate (as you can see here) but regardless is still the best procedure out there at the moment.Comment
-
I perfectly understand what she's saying though. She's kind of admitting that regrowth is nowhere near 80%, just like we saw in GC's case (where we saw 65% but that number was greatly skewed to the upside because of the failed extractions, hence it's most probably even lower than 50%).
IF all the BS you claim about "Kristel is saying" would be true, then can you explain me and others please ...
- for what was your whole "50 grafts test procedure" crap at all;
- and why was Kristel willing to do one, if the "addmitted success rate" is much lower as claimed by HSCI??Comment
-
By the way ...
IF all the BS you claim about "Kristel is saying" would be true, then can you explain me and others please ...
- for what was your whole "50 grafts test procedure" crap at all;
- and why was Kristel willing to do one, if the "addmitted success rate" is much lower as claimed by HSCI??Comment
-
And after they understood the 1st 50 graft test was worthless because they hadn't shot 1 single good pre-op photo, they surely must have understood the importance of a good pre-op photo. I even mailed it to them how important it was (in case they hadn't figured it out, lol). And now we get to see 1 (just 1) pre-op photo's that's way below mediocre at best ? Why is that ? You tell me ..Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I don't know HOW OFTEN we discussed the purpose of the 3 sections in Gho's petri dishes - all I know it was very often. Section "3" is ONLY for the so-called "failed extraction" grafts!!Comment
-
By the way ...
IF all the BS you claim about "Kristel is saying" would be true, then can you explain me and others please ...
- for what was your whole "50 grafts test procedure" crap at all;
- and why was Kristel willing to do one, if the "addmitted success rate" is much lower as claimed by HSCI??
2. You keep ignoring this issue, but do you think 80% of the hairs extracted during your procedure regenerated? Because I didn't see that at all for either you or gc.Comment
-
Ik moest inclusief instellen 75x boren voor 51 goede grafts. Dit waren 23 met 1 wortel, 16 met 2 wortel en 2 met 3 wortelsComment
-
"Ik moest inclusief instellen 75x boren voor 51 goede grafts. Dit waren 23 met 1 wortel, 16 met 2 wortel en 2 met 3 wortels"
Yeah - and?
We know in the meanwhile, that you don't even understand you native language, because there is not 1 single word which says, that the 3-hair grafts belong to section "3" in the petri dish - besides the fact, that we noticed a typo and/or wrong counting anyhow.
The text just says how many 1-hair, 2-hair and 3-hair grafts she extracted and how many drills she made to get "51 goede grafts" - that's all.Comment
-
Where are the 3-hair grafts in the petri dish genius?Comment
-
Comment
-
Yup ! Remember how those numbers she gave didn't add up (23+16+2 =41, not 51). And remember how we figured that she must have had the number of 3's wrong and that it must be 12 since this guy's hair is very very normal/average and he had a lot of 3's in donor ? Now look at the petridish photo I posted before ! the correct numbers are:
1's: 33
2's: 16
3's: 2
(well petridish shows 2x 15 and 3x3 to be precize, they might have moved 1 from the 2 to 3 section)
Anyway, that's an average of only 1.35 hair per graft. That's even way worse than the 1.5 I predicted earlier.Comment
-
I see 1-hair grafts in the 1 section, 2-hair grafts in the 2 section.
Where are the 3-hair grafts outside the 3 section. Does your ridicolous, delusional Gho-bias make you see things that don't exist?Comment
Comment