Drug companies will stop a cure hitting the market
Collapse
X
-
What ever happened to that new discovery not too long ago, about the excessive amount of Prostaglandin D2 in the scalp. Wasn't a company already deriving a drug for that, which is intended for asthma which is suppose to be available in like 3 months. There needs to be more talk about Prostaglandin D2 in this forum. It might be like a 90% percent hair growth. I think Spencer and Joe might know more about this and are not telling us all the truth. If this happens to be the true cure, then Spencer would be out of a job.Leave a comment:
-
I kind of said that in the 2nd part of my post... I said that those diseases were complex and weren't simple fixes. Guess I should have worded it differently though... And I completely agree that medicine hasn't advanced enough, I was just reading all those posts from before and wanted to post my thoughts.Leave a comment:
-
If such nebulous forces are really bent on stifling the development of disease cures as a means of population control, how is it that upwards of a billion dollars is spent every year on malaria prevention around the world?I was just thinking about a possible reason why some diseases are treated and cures are not released: population control. As messed up as this sounds, this planet has limited resources and is over populated. Imagine how much the world's population would increase if those diseases were cured.Leave a comment:
-
-
.... OR it could be that the scientists can't come up with a simple way to fix some of the current diseases because they're just TOO COMPLICATED to be cured with a simple pill or injection.
Medicine hasn't advanced enough VS population control. Which do you think it is??Leave a comment:
-
I know I'm posting this like a day late but oh well haha. I was just thinking about a possible reason why some diseases are treated and cures are not released: population control. As messed up as this sounds, this planet has limited resources and is over populated. Imagine how much the world's population would increase if those diseases were cured. Also not to mention the money involved. I'm not sure that the companies use 100% of charity (such as the heart and stroke foundation etc) money for research, but God I hope I'm wrong. An example of company's not using a sufficient amount of donations is invisible children.That makes as much sense as saying that cancer hasn't been cured because it would hurt the pharmaceutical/medical dept. pockets. As if the medical community at large doesn't have family members that could possibly or have died from cancer.
I wouldn't classify you as a conspiracy theorist. Just a wee bit pessimistic.
Now on the other hand, if you begin to talk about 911....
Don't get me wrong, I want cures for cancer, aids, hair loss, etc more than anything and I understand that they are very complex problems and aren't simple fixes. It just seems weird sometimes... Oh well though, let's hope for some good new from Replicel in the next few weeks.Leave a comment:
-
Histogen will definitely have something in 2015 (possibly even 2014 in Asia)ok well it is obviously something subject to your own beliefs and opinions, none of us could say for sure the other is wrong.
just out of interest though
post a reply of the year you think a cure type of treatment will hit the market (obviously it cannot be anything other than an educated guess) i just want to see how optimistic or sceptical you guys are?
me personally: 2025Leave a comment:
-
ok well it is obviously something subject to your own beliefs and opinions, none of us could say for sure the other is wrong.
just out of interest though
post a reply of the year you think a cure type of treatment will hit the market (obviously it cannot be anything other than an educated guess) i just want to see how optimistic or sceptical you guys are?
me personally: 2025Leave a comment:
-
And promising self-driving automobile technology has already been demonstrated. How come the powerful chauffeur lobbies and truckers unions haven't bought up the patents yet?Leave a comment:
-
Except that baldies to be are born everyday. So there will always be a stream of income with cellular treatments. We don't even know if these cellular treatments are long lasting so we may all need topups every 5 years or so. A cure of the kind we're talking about would be megabucks.It does not take a genius to realise drug companies make money out of creating treatments whether or not they come to market. This is the reason they do spend money and genuinely try to come up with stuff. You see curing baldness and making money from curing baldness are not the same thing.
When they are successful and create a real promising treatment that looks like a cure, a bigger player comes in and buys them out either by giving them money for the patent or buy buying the company out. I am not saying this is always going to be the case but I believe its happening often and is a result of the greedy capitalist system and its exploitation of the medical industry.
By your logic, the contact lense guys would have stopped LASIK from becoming commonplace. That just didn't happen.Leave a comment:
-
so someone has been buying out patents that could have cured hair loss??
ffs there is no conspiracy here. scientists just didn't know much about male pattern baldness back then. go join flat earth society or something.Leave a comment:
-
-
sorry to detract from your point (something gmanaco practises)
but I spend £40 a month on propecia
£20 a month on rogaine
£30 a month on couvre
£6 a month on Nizoral
that is £96 a month x 12 = £1152! in todays dollars this is actually $1827.
back to your point that there are a couple of companies competing and they all make soo much more money out of other products etc so why would they bother interfering ... well dont forget that each of these companies will not look at their finances as a whole and be like oh let's just forget about controlling the hairloss market because we have plenty of other products etc they will all meticulously work out the best way to make sales and profits out of each product that they sell and as I pointed out their customers with the long term treatment products are worth more than they could get away charging for a one off cure treatment. I rest my case, thanks for playing though.
.... if some company comes up with a cure, that company will be valued SO HIGH, that it would become waay to expensive for them to buy it because it would take DECADES and DECADES of Propecia's and Rogaine's future profits to make all that money back....
Their patents are about to expire anyways! They won't be able to make that money back so WHY WOULD THEY EVEN BOTHER??? THEY WILL LOSE MONEY!Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: