Yet another criticism for Finasteride
Collapse
X
-
The statistics that Dr. Irwig mentions refer only to the group of patients he studied. They do not pertain to the likelihood you will develop side effects. -
Exactly. They are a self-selected group of side-effect sufferers, so they don't represent Finasteride users in general.I am a patient and representative of Dr Rahal
My FUE With Dr Rahal - Awesome Hairline Result
I can be contacted for advice: matt@rahalhairline.comComment
-
This topic it stirring up quite a controversy in the hair transplant community. In fact I know that at the upcoming ISHRS annual conference this year in Alaska there will be some heated debates and organized panel discussions. Hopefully we will receive some more information form the drug companies and that more studies will be performed in the near future.Comment
-
I will do my best.Comment
-
Dr. Charles, thanks for your comment. Are you acquainted with any hair surgeons that either believe in the existence of Propecia's persistent side effects or even that it is a possibility? From my experience, I have yet to encounter a hair transplant surgeon that has not instantly rejected these possibilities. The statement that the ISHRS has put out recently seems conclusory despite not being conclusive.
The reaction from endocrinologists and urologists has been notably different.Comment
-
I agree that most of the hair restoration physicians do not think that permanant side effect are possible or at least very unlikely.Comment
-
Many doctors I have seen rejected it out of hand because they have never had a patient report these side effects to them but I find this to be a dangerous rationale for two reasons. First, just because they haven't seen it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Secondly, patients will not always connect side effects to medications, especially since the product warning said persistent side effects were non-existent until recently.Comment
Comment