Propecia side affects Merck or bladtruth won't tell you about

[PayDay]

Yes but they applied for fin as a prevention drug and lost

Great, just another example of the misinformation and out and out lies that flood these forums and the entire internet.The FDA failed to approve an indication for the drug for use in prostate cancer prevention, not for prevention or treatment of BPH or enlarged prostates. Big difference!

[topt]

I made a mistake; reading wrong sources.
Why is a difference ? They proved it reduces the chance of prostate cancer, so why not use it as a prevention drug. I mean its a lot more important than prevention of losing hair.
As I understand fin is also not a drug for prevention of prostate enlargement only for treatment, also more serious condition than losing hair.

[PayDay]

I made a mistake; reading wrong sources.
Why is a difference ? They proved it reduces the chance of prostate cancer, so why not use it as a prevention drug. I mean its a lot more important than prevention of losing hair.
As I understand fin is also not a drug for prevention of prostate enlargement only for treatment, also more serious condition than losing hair.

Ok, you made a mistake. It happens. No one is saying that hair loss is more serious than cancer or prostate enlargement. The drug has been on the market for 23 years in one form or another, if you don’t want to take it for your hair loss then don’t No one is telling you to. I don’t see what the issue is? We are all in agreement. Like with all drugs, taking Propecia comes with potential risks, if you are unwilling to deal with those risks then don’t touch the stuff.

[Herbaliser]

Ok, you made a mistake. It happens. No one is saying that hair loss is more serious than cancer or prostate enlargement. The drug has been on the market for 23 years in one form or another, if you don’t want to take it for your hair loss then don’t No one is telling you to. I don’t see what the issue is? We are all in agreement. Like with all drugs, taking Propecia comes with potential risks, if you are unwilling to deal with those risks then don’t touch the stuff.

Don´t you think the issue is vague trials and misleading side effect information?
People are using a drug that was meant for another purpose that is cure related, and not as a cosmetic treatment.

[Herbaliser]

Sorry forgot about the prescription gaining cash doc, that tells the patients that he never heard of sides for the other victims.

[John15]

The New Zealand health authorities now Recognise - Post-Finasteride Syndrome.

http://medsafe.govt.nz/profs/PUArticles/March2016/PostFinasterideSyndrome.htm

[BBay]

Chemicals have different reactions on individuals so Big Pharma are the experts on making the most of "reactions " of clients. Watery sperm and the rest of the side effects may or may not happen to you but can happen to others.

[willistrong]

I totally agree with you, man. The side effects are not worth the effect of the drugs. I would rather be bald or with less hair than with such side effects. I understand the usage of such drugs when the person is HIV infected, and his life is at stake, but when you are simply bald. Also, guys, HIV is such a terrifying disease, please, be careful, and if needed, do same day HIV test.