Small tits is nothing compared to hair loss !!!

[Notcoolanymore]

The main difference that sucks about having hair loss as opposed to small tits is that hair loss makes you look old. Lack of hair can easily make you look 10 - 15 years older than you really are. Small tits might cause insecurity, but it doesn't age you.

[mpb47]

Because they are older now and more mature they understand that we cant help going bald while when you are a teen you more immature and still getting to grips with life sort of speak.

I am sure that is it in some cases though the women I was referring
to said they didn't know why their feelings changed. Also saw quite a few say basicaly what the poster below you said:

bald is fine, circles and horseshoes not so much. Cut very short is also good.

[PatientlyWaiting]

I'm not saying I don't believe you, but is there any evidence that more men nowadays have MPB?

I didn't say that in my post.

Basically of the men who have MPB, more and more are getting it younger.

Whether more men have MPB now than in the past is true or not, I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.

[darryls]

The main difference that sucks about having hair loss as opposed to small tits is that hair loss makes you look old. Lack of hair can easily make you look 10 - 15 years older than you really are. Small tits might cause insecurity, but it doesn't age you.

yeah but women are viewed only for their beauty so when you think about it they are worse off

[Dan26]

small breasts can be a deal breaker for some woman in terms of finding a good husband who wants to have kids with them...large breasts are a sign of fertility and good child bearing ability and a part from the physical attraction subconsciously men use this as one of the many indicators in finding a woman they want to reproduce with

in the same sense a woman can see a bald or balding guy and subconciously think bad genes and be put off....thats why to pull of the bald look, one you must shave your head and two you must have good facial symettry and head shape

[PaulS94]

small breasts can be a deal breaker for some woman in terms of finding a good husband who wants to have kids with them...large breasts are a sign of fertility and good child bearing ability and a part from the physical attraction subconsciously men use this as one of the many indicators in finding a woman they want to reproduce with

in the same sense a woman can see a bald or balding guy and subconciously think bad genes and be put off....thats why to pull of the bald look, one you must shave your head and two you must have good facial symettry and head shape

How does that make sense...Women can carry the baldness gene without displaying any signs of hair loss. Does that mean they have "bad genes" too? A son who has bald men on his mom's side is more likely to go bald than if his dad is bald...

[Notcoolanymore]

A son who has bald men on his mom's side is more likely to go bald than if his dad is bald...

Really?...Interesting. I can believe this. My dad is a NW7 but looking at pics of him when he was younger, I can see that my balding pattern is not the same as his. My pattern is similar to my great grandfather's on my moms side.

[PaulS94]

I didn't say that in my post.

Basically of the men who have MPB, more and more are getting it younger.

Whether more men have MPB now than in the past is true or not, I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case.

This chart says only ~6% of (white) males have SOME hair loss from ages 18-29 and only ~2-3% have a lot hair loss...And I heard that Caucasians have higher rates of MPB than Asians, African Americans, and Latinos, so that number is probably even lower for them...

(Scroll down for the MPB percentage chart.) It's old, but I can't see how MPB rates and occurrence in younger males can drastically change in just 30-40 years as you're suggesting...

http://www.drshellyfriedman.com/how-hair-is-lost.html

[PaulS94]

Really?...Interesting. I can believe this. My dad is a NW7 but looking at pics of him when he was younger, I can see that my balding pattern is not the same as his. My pattern is similar to my great grandfather's on my moms side.

Even if your maternal grandfather is not bald, your maternal grandmother can still pass the baldness gene to your mom who then has I think a 50% chance to pass it on to her son. This means that you will inherit the pattern of your maternal grandmother's father. But I think you only have a 25% chance of this actually happening. I can't confirm if this is true or not, but it makes sense...it's not like you can detect if females are carrying the baldness gene since it doesn't show it females like it does in males.

It's really hard to find information on this...Everywhere I look, people are still spreading the myth that baldness only comes from your maternal grandfather, but if this was true, then a lot more men would be going bald at age 40-60+... Who knows, maybe it takes a lot of different genes from both parents to determine your pattern, rate, and whether or not you'll even be sensitive to DHT.

[clandestine]

This chart says only ~6% of (white) males have SOME hair loss from ages 18-29 and only ~2-3% have a lot hair loss...And I heard that Caucasians have higher rates of MPB than Asians, African Americans, and Latinos, so that number is probably even lower for them...

(Scroll down for the MPB percentage chart.) It's old, but I can't see how MPB rates and occurrence in younger males can drastically change in just 30-40 years as you're suggesting...

http://www.drshellyfriedman.com/how-hair-is-lost.html

I find it hard to believe I'm that special.

[PaulS94]

I find it hard to believe I'm that special.

Well you are... NW4 or 5 in guys who are in their early or mid 20s is pretty rare unless genetics really screwed you over...30s is a bit more common, but it's still only around 15-20%. And a lot of guys who lost a lot of hair in their 20s sometimes don't even have a thinning crown, it's just their hairline that recedes really far back, which is pretty easy to hide or at least make it look less noticeable with the right hair style.

[DannyBoyy7]

Well you are... NW4 or 5 in guys who are in their early or mid 20s is pretty rare unless genetics really screwed you over...30s is a bit more common, but it's still only around 15-20%. And a lot of guys who lost a lot of hair in their 20s sometimes don't even have a thinning crown, it's just their hairline that recedes really far back, which is pretty easy to hide or at least make it look less noticeable with the right hair style.

"And a lot of guys who lost a lot of hair in their 20s sometimes don't even have a thinning crown, it's just their hairline that recedes really far back, which is pretty easy to hide or at least make it look less noticeable with the right hair style"...pretty much what my hairloss has been doing since 16 (im now 21)...but now that i shave it to pretty much stubble i can see how far back my hair has gone (which is quite far my hair i would say is atleast the middle of my head now maybe abit further)...and i think the crown is starting to thin out aswell....looks like there is none on top when im in the sun or some very bright light lol.

[darryls]

Well you are... NW4 or 5 in guys who are in their early or mid 20s is pretty rare unless genetics really screwed you over...30s is a bit more common, but it's still only around 15-20%. And a lot of guys who lost a lot of hair in their 20s sometimes don't even have a thinning crown, it's just their hairline that recedes really far back, which is pretty easy to hide or at least make it look less noticeable with the right hair style.

people always notice

[greatjob!]

PaulS94, your grasp of genetics is clearly limited, you should not speak on things you know little about. That is how urban legends and misinformation spread.