Hair Science Academy – HST training for doctors from all over the world!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 534623
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 1854

    Hair Science Academy – HST training for doctors from all over the world!

    Just found the following NEWS on http://www.hasci.com/homepage.aspx

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    European Patent for Hair Stem Cell Transplantation®!

    As of August 8th 2012 Hair Stem Cell Transplantation® is not only patented in The Netherlands but in the whole of Europe. The patent with the number 1957092 is titled ‘Method for in vivo multiplication of hair’.

    paper 1

    paper 2


    Based on this European patent Hair Science Institute (HSI) assumes that finally clarity has arisen when it comes to the rights, claims, and implementation concerning Hair Stem Cell Transplantation®. In the (recent) past these were doubted more than once in the courtroom by other hair transplantation clinics. Each time however with for HSCI very favourable rulings.

    In the meanwhile HSCI has started with the building of a Hair Science Academy. Located at Medical Centre ‘De Wittevrouwenhof’ in Maastricht (Netherlands) it will receive doctors and technicians from all over the world. Here they will be trained in executing Hair Stem Cell Transplantation®. After certification they will be entitled to apply the patented technique on their own clients and patients.
    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
  • didi
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 1360

    #2

    Comment

    • hellouser
      Senior Member
      • May 2012
      • 4419

      #3
      Maybe the patent had something to do with Spencer's delayed interview?

      Comment

      • NeedHairASAP
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 1408

        #4
        whoa, that's big news.



        update: Hairs coming in surprisingly well at the 1.5 month mark. Excited to see how things look at the 12 month mark. Will maybe post my pictures in the coming weeks.

        Comment

        • maxhair
          Member
          • Oct 2011
          • 97

          #5
          Just because something is patented, does not mean it works.

          It just means that it is novel.

          When Gho turns a Norwood 6 or 7 with low/average donor density into a Norwood 2, then believe him.

          You can't polish a turd, but you probably can patent it as a safe hair loss cure.

          Comment

          • hellouser
            Senior Member
            • May 2012
            • 4419

            #6
            Originally posted by maxhair
            Just because something is patented, does not mean it works.

            It just means that it is novel.

            When Gho turns a Norwood 6 or 7 with low/average donor density into a Norwood 2, then believe him.

            You can't polish a turd, but you probably can patent it as a safe hair loss cure.
            You do realize that isnt even a fair statement considering all the variables needed: a completely bald man, with a LOT of cash, many years for consistent procedures and the willingness to be documented and exposed as I'm sure pessimists such as yourself wouldnt believe it if it were an anonymous individual.

            Comment

            • Kiwi
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2011
              • 1087

              #7
              Originally posted by hellouser
              You do realize that isnt even a fair statement considering all the variables needed: a completely bald man, with a LOT of cash, many years for consistent procedures and the willingness to be documented and exposed as I'm sure pessimists such as yourself wouldnt believe it if it were an anonymous individual.
              Thats bullshit. If Gho really wanted to promote himself as a solution for NW6 or NW7 he'd have done this and have photographic evidence.

              What really sux about Gho's solution is that if the techniques he learnt were "patented" in the first place he wouldnt be where he is now.

              Yay! Now we're more behind and less likely to get the results from this procedure because he's a douche bag.

              Comment

              • maxhair
                Member
                • Oct 2011
                • 97

                #8
                Originally posted by hellouser
                You do realize that isnt even a fair statement considering all the variables needed: a completely bald man, with a LOT of cash, many years for consistent procedures and the willingness to be documented and exposed as I'm sure pessimists such as yourself wouldnt believe it if it were an anonymous individual.
                If you can turn a N6 or 7 to a N1 or 2, then you find someone who doesn't mind sharing, and you publicize his transformation.

                "Er... yeah... he probably can't find a willing volunteer who is bald to undergo a transformation so drastic everyone will know he's had work anyway, because er... he wouldn't want anyone to know... er..."

                Get a grip man.

                If a surgeon has a cure for baldness, then finding a patient to demonstrate it on will not be a problem you cretin.

                Comment

                • hellouser
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2012
                  • 4419

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Kiwi
                  Thats bullshit. If Gho really wanted to promote himself as a solution for NW6 or NW7 he'd have done this and have photographic evidence.

                  What really sux about Gho's solution is that if the techniques he learnt were "patented" in the first place he wouldnt be where he is now.

                  Yay! Now we're more behind and less likely to get the results from this procedure because he's a douche bag.
                  You completely ignored the variables I stated and it isn't him alone thats responsible for turning someone from NW6/7 to NW1, he's only HALF the party responsible.

                  If youre a NW7, why dont YOU sign up for it? That said I'll repeat myself: got the cash? Got the X number of years before you return to NW1? Are you willing to make yourself and your story public?

                  Comment

                  • NeedHairASAP
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2011
                    • 1408

                    #10
                    I think the big news is the academy, not the patent

                    the patent doesn't prove a process works. it just means nobody can use the process.

                    again though, I am happy with my result thus far-- 1.5 - 1.75 months in

                    Comment

                    • didi
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2011
                      • 1360

                      #11
                      True NW7,from this




                      to this





                      is not a big ask, Gho should be able to deliver at least something like this, 12 000 grafts can be done in 5 x 2500 graft sessions spaces 9 months apart, it would take 45 months for job to be completed....then if sides and back of head donor gets depleted Gho can use transplanted hair on top as new donor.....in i dont see reason why not? It is normal,dht resisten thair.

                      Comment

                      • Arashi
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 3888

                        #12
                        Originally posted by NeedHairASAP
                        update: Hairs coming in surprisingly well at the 1.5 month mark. Excited to see how things look at the 12 month mark. Will maybe post my pictures in the coming weeks.
                        Please do ! Would love to see them. I'm scheduled for the 14th of next month myself.

                        Comment

                        • didi
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2011
                          • 1360

                          #13
                          What patenting HST achieves as opposed to not patenting it?

                          How does it protect technology from not being used by someone else when its not known unless he revelead all the details and are publicly known ?





                          Can it stop company abc from using the same technique and calling it xyz instead of hst, gho wouldnt even know what technique this clinic is using to start off with

                          i feel this is just a marketing ploy,what if someone patented HT, fue or fut?

                          Comment

                          • 534623
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2011
                            • 1854

                            #14
                            Originally posted by didi
                            What patenting HST achieves as opposed to not patenting it?

                            How does it protect technology from not being used by someone else when its not known unless he revelead all the details and are publicly known ?
                            1) Best Answer

                            2) More specific


                            Originally posted by didi
                            ...what if someone patented HT, fue or fut?
                            This is regulated by law:

                            Basically, you can't patent normal transplants; e.g. transplantation of whole/intact hearts, livers, kidneys etc - as well as transplantation of whole/intact hair follicles.

                            But IF you find a way to make 2 hearts or livers or kidneys or hair follicles from 1 - THIS is patentable. The reason for the latter is to encourage scientists/researchers to enable the latter one day - simply for a better (medical) life in future.

                            Comment

                            • didi
                              Senior Member
                              • Nov 2011
                              • 1360

                              #15
                              ..So HASCI should fully disclose details of the technique in order to get patent for it(protect it), including 'magicGho juice' where he baths grafts and everything thats related to hst as it makes no sense and it probablly isnt allowed to patent somethning and keep it secret,right?

                              Wouldnt reveling too much details screw hasci over as anyone could copy and use it,
                              How do patent firms verify that his claims are accurate?

                              Comment

                              Working...