It 's over. Dr. Mwamba confirmed Nigam!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tmw
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 19

    #16
    Originally posted by Arashi
    But really, tell me, how can he be sure about 60% after just visiting Nigams ? The answer is he can't. He's just speculating.
    well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;
    he did not say it can't be 100% in all of his cases, he just gave a pesimistic number, and for that he cancelled that number

    I think it wanted to say: if the technique works, my idea is that you all can get a good % of donor regrowth

    Comment

    • Arashi
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2012
      • 3888

      #17
      Originally posted by tmw
      well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;
      he did not say it can't be 100% in all of his cases, he just gave a pesimistic number, and for that he cancelled that number

      I think it wanted to say: if the technique works, my idea is that you all can get a good % of donor regrowth
      This is supposedly what he said: I can achieve in the future re-growth of at least 60% of the donor used

      Comment

      • didi
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2011
        • 1360

        #18
        what arashi want to say is that Dr Mwamba couldn't possibly be certain whether regen is happening at all after spending only 2 weeks in India,

        Comment

        • Arashi
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 3888

          #19
          Originally posted by didi
          what arashi want to say is that Dr Mwamba couldn't possibly be certain whether regen is happening at all after spending only 2 weeks in India,
          Exactly. In 2 weeks you can't do any experiments. You can just listen to what Dr Nigams promises. And that he can motivate people and promise us the most beatiful things, that we all know by now. But we don't want promises, we want results.

          Comment

          • tmw
            Junior Member
            • Sep 2012
            • 19

            #20
            Originally posted by Arashi
            This is supposedly what he said: I can achieve in the future re-growth of at least 60% of the donor used
            No man I'm telling you for the third time he modified that message and remove any %, he said to avoid misunderstandings.

            And again, No one said it works for sure, the consulent just said he will start to perform it soon but he feels confident.

            Comment

            • Arashi
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2012
              • 3888

              #21
              Originally posted by tmw
              No man I'm telling you for the third time he modified that message and remove any %, he said to avoid misunderstandings.

              And again, No one said it works for sure, the consulent just said he will start to perform it soon but he feels confident.
              I think your English is a bit problematic here. What exactly happened ? His consultent went rogue, posted a number and then dr Mwamba called him back ? This seems like Nigams practices ...

              Comment

              • tmw
                Junior Member
                • Sep 2012
                • 19

                #22
                Originally posted by Arashi
                I think your English is a bit problematic here. What exactly happened ? His consultent went rogue, posted a number and then dr Mwamba called him back ? This seems like Nigams practices ...
                Well I think my English is pretty good indeed and it's clear you don't want to understand. I'm just helpin you all to get the best translation possible.
                Don't care what he did/removed, Im just telling you the facts

                Comment

                • Arashi
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2012
                  • 3888

                  #23
                  Originally posted by tmw
                  Well I think my English is pretty good indeed and it's clear you don't want to understand. I'm just helpin you all to get the best translation possible.
                  Don't care what he did/removed, Im just telling you the facts
                  Sorry, not trying to disrespect, but when you wrote:

                  "well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;"

                  How are we supposed to understand what that means ? A negative %, so that's donor loss instead of regrowth ?

                  Comment

                  • DesperateOne
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2013
                    • 289

                    #24
                    2 weeks? Well this just keeps getting better and better.

                    Comment

                    • tmw
                      Junior Member
                      • Sep 2012
                      • 19

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Arashi
                      Sorry, not trying to disrespect, but when you wrote:

                      "well if you read before writing, his consulent just said it was a negative %;"

                      How are we supposed to understand what that means ? A negative %, so that's donor loss instead of regrowth ?
                      sorry, what I wanted to say is that his consulent removed that % because this 60 could be a pessimistic number and it's better not to give precise % at the moment, as this treatment still needs to be experimented

                      Comment

                      • Arashi
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2012
                        • 3888

                        #26
                        Originally posted by tmw
                        sorry, what I wanted to say is that his consulent removed that % because this 60 could be a pessimistic number and it's better not to give precise % at the moment, as this treatment still needs to be experimented
                        Ok, thanks for clearing that up. But even then, how can they even know they can achieve at least 60% ?? They can't. In 2 weeks time it's impossible to perform any experiments and see results. All they could do it talk to Nigams.

                        Comment

                        • tmw
                          Junior Member
                          • Sep 2012
                          • 19

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Arashi
                          Ok, thanks for clearing that up. But even then, how can they even know they can achieve 60% ?? They can't. In 2 weeks time it's impossible to perform any experiments and see results. All they could do it talk to Nigams.
                          Maybe it was just a supposition,don't know exactly man

                          Comment

                          • Arashi
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2012
                            • 3888

                            #28
                            Originally posted by tmw
                            Maybe it was just a supposition,don't know exactly man
                            Well, my point is, this is a serious hit on Mwamba's credibility. He was supposed to be a trustworthy guy and now he's just speculating and promising stuff, just like Nigams always does !?!?!?! Where's the proof ?

                            Comment

                            • tmw
                              Junior Member
                              • Sep 2012
                              • 19

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Arashi
                              Well, my point is, this is a serious hit on Mwamba's credibility. He was supposed to be a trustworthy guy and now he's just speculating and promising stuff, just like Nigams always does !?!?!?! Where's the proof ?
                              they explained the stuff seems promising and makes sense, so they will try.
                              Atm no promises about working for sure or not. This is what I read
                              I'm still very interested though

                              Comment

                              • Arashi
                                Senior Member
                                • Aug 2012
                                • 3888

                                #30
                                Originally posted by tmw
                                they explained the stuff seems promising and makes sense, so they will try.
                                Atm no promises about working for sure or not. This is what I read
                                I'm still very interested though
                                It's interesting but it also gets very discouraging. Dr Nigams made it sound like Mwamba would come in and verify his therapy. He didn't. I had hoped he would perform some experiments and tell us in 6 months how they worked out. Well, maybe he did that, but then why post stuff like that 60% (and later remove it) !?!? This Mwamba guy seems to be just like Nigams.

                                Anyway, let's forget about this. The real proof is in converting a NW7 to a NW1. Dr Nigams promised us he's going to start with 5 NW7's which he's going to turn into NW1's next monday. Let's focus on that, cause that only that could finally yield the proof we all seek.

                                Comment

                                Working...