Spencer&Jotronic on HST
Collapse
X
-
Unfortunately that won't fly, Spencer has said that he won't put anybody he is not comfortable with on his show because the very fact they appear on his show is a huge commercial boost to them. This is one of the reasons that Dr Nigam does not get on the show - so whilst he may have preached some caution with Acell it seems to me his judgement was off on this occasion.
Nothing terrible about that, nobody bats 100%, and I certainly don't think he is batting well if he says anybody can do HST.Comment
-
Provide a link to them, because I haven't seen ANY "horror stories" from 2002/2003 and I have been around that long, if you cannot provide a link then the unkind side of me might think you are pulling that out of your ***
Comment
-
I made some time to go and look at the show where Spencer Kobren talks to Jotronic about Dr Gho. I couldn't watch the whole show but I watched the bit where Jotronic rang in.
Firstly I should say that in a totally non-gay way
I love these guys because there are so many bad people in the industry and these are two of the rare exceptions who are actually on the other end - really good people who are trying to help others.
Generally I thought that what they said was great advice, they are sceptical about Dr Gho and I think with good reason. There is a reason that I didn't get an HST when I got turned down for the 50 graft trial and that is that I wanted to see more evidence - which for some reason HASCI are consistently **** at producing. I too don't believe the 80% regeneration in real terms is validated or even likely, I think it is much lower than that. What we DO have is sterling work provided by guys on the forums which show close up evidence that HST isn't all hokum.
What Spencer did say was that if you want a very conservative HT with minimal/no scarring in the donor area then Dr Gho might well be a good option.
Where I STILL disagree with him is his assumption that other good FUE doctors could easily reproduce his results - we have ZERO evidence to date of that.Comment

Comment