Tweet
yes, do that, and stop talking in between... just do...
-
-
..and don't be sooooo german.Comment
-
after seeing results from Dean S, caddirck,arashi im starting to think how most patients simply stop having more than 1 or 2 procedure, especially ones with extensive HL, nw5+...
after having 1 procedure they realize how little cosmetic difference it makes for amount of money invested and how painfully slow the process is going to be,
its even worse for people who are still balding(arash/caddrk) and trying to catch up with baldness and be on top of it,
but its also depressing for all NW5+ sufferers as bald area is huge and hst procedures are small with only 1 and 2 hair grafts which fuks things up even more, long waiting period on top...
im thinking that HASCI deliberately sabotaged both tests to make it impossible to get clear idea of hsts limitation,
50 grafts test puts them on the spot, no wonder they refuse experienced FUE doctors to scrutinize it...
8 years of hair multiplication(as hasci calls it) and nothing to show for it...yea right, imo its the biggest sc@m in the history of HT,
our hope is dr nigam or french dr..they are transparent and easy to communicate, hope it worksComment
-
iron man you are mentally unstable loser,
theres no other way to put,
I understand your desperation and obsession with hair but its time to start looking things from different angle
you acting like possessed fanatic, must be german thingComment
-
sorry skywalker, me biased against hasci...
nobody needs to take me seriously, as you can see people are waking up and asking questions,
btw, skywalker, which statement above is not solid? you still wanna believe gho is multiplying hair,at 80% donor regen rate and givin 2.5 hairs on average?(hascis claims)
if you do then you are not far behind Iron ManComment
-
Sure, happy to point out the multiple statements that are not solid:
You have provided no evidence that HASCI sabotaged the test, we need more information on the state of that.
The reason that they are unlikely to get FUE doctors to scrutinize their work is because FUE doctors have shown already a lack of objectivity in their comments and it is not in their financial interest for HST to be a success.
You have provided no evidence that this is the most massive $cam in all of history.
Your whole approach has been extremely negative towards HASCI and I am not the only one that has noticed it - that doesn't mean that I think Caddarik's result is good - it isn't, and I have always said that their presentation of their work is half-assed, but quite frankly you seem to have a clear agenda against them.Comment
-
Iron man aka 5348956 = last Ghos fanboy...
IM, didn't you say HST is not suitable to extract 1 hair grafts but its more suitable to extract 2s and 3s,(Ive been told the same by HASCI)
how do you explain that Gho somehow always gets more 1s then any other grafts combined?Comment
-
The voice of reason !
Didi you're almost as extreme as IM. You're way more civilized, that's for sure, but you're also extremely biased. You keep saying that HST is a waste of money, while in fact it's currently the only procedure out there that is scarless and if we look at all results, it makes a lot of sense to assume that regrowth is happening, probably around 50%.Comment
-
And this whole idea's of 'camps'. Like you're either with Gho or with Nigams, like it's some kind of soccer game and we're rooting for one side ! Come on, grow up you guys.Comment
-
just bc Iron man is imbecile,
rmbr how excited he was when he purchased his usb micro and he thought he 'proven' hst beyond reasonable doubt....
he ignored failed extractions and recipient growth.....even imbecile would know you cant ignore these 2 crucial factorsComment
-
Didi wants Gho to fail just to feel vindicated!
Nigam on the other hand seems to have more lives than a cat.
Photoshopping, exposing NSN real name (he was so pissed about that, you don't even know!)Comment
Comment